I believe that U.S. executives are overpaid because much of their salary is also based on credits that they shouldn't have gotten. Even though they practice stealth wealth, they get huge compensations because of the interest when they retire. Many companies match these interest rates which overpays them more than they deserve. Also, the idea of having a law for CEO's makes my argument correct. While huge firms hire people to do over the phone sales overseas in countries such as India and China, these people get paid ridiculous amounts like $4.00 an hour. Why don't we have a law against these kinds of employees that receive less than minimum wage? Aren't they working for a U.S company? Basically, I think it is ridiculous that a law has been made for decades now that requires the compensation of CEO's …show more content…
They will take from a company as much as they can get. According to the article, in 1992 CEO's saw the amount that the employees were making and still demanded that they should be paid more. Workers don't realize that if it wasn't for these hard labors for a company being done, these CEO's would not have the right to just sit and basically don't do anything. Another point that they are overpaid is by the contracts they sign. From many of the examples in the texts, one stood out the most. "that the CEO could theoretically join the army of a foreign state--Libya, say--and still not get fired for "cause." Which is why, in practice, nobody ever is."(Ussem pg.3) Not only are they overpaid, but they can never get fired. It is rare to hear that a CEO got fired over something that didn't make sense. These companies now a days make these ridiculous contracts that basically create a relationship with the CEO and don't give him a chance to get fired. They can drop the companies stock by 40% and still not get fired. This is absurd because if a common worker making minimum wage did one thing work, they would get fired immediately.
According to Charity Navigator (Are Nonprofit CEOs Overpaid?), certain industries pay more than others, specifically; an executive can earn more at an Educational charity rather than a Religious one. Geographical location typically reflects the variations in cost of living throughout the country. Naturally, charities with larger budgets can afford to provide higher compensation. The focus of an organization's mission can also have a significant impact on the amount of compensation available. The board of a nonprofit should have a documented policy for determining compensation and raises. While there are not very many charitable organization executives earning over $1 million dollars annually, it should still be of concern because such an amount is quite
...ith strong share price and some of them will get the organisation with the worst conditions of company performance. This is when the corporate governance bringing the right direction for organisation making best practice in deciding executive remuneration to sufficiently attract and motivate, eventhough to reach the satisfactory result there is a long way to go, involves time and efforts. The executives' remuneration at WH Smith especially for CEO is considered appropriate because it does not rely on agency theory alone but also considered the guidelines of the UK Corporate Government Code (2010) which is to attract, retain and motivate directors. To support this argument, “high pay itself is not evidence of inefficient contracts but may simply reflect the market for CEOs and the pay necessary to attract, retain, and motivate talented individuals.” (Conyon, M. 2006)
The United States is the most developed capitalist economy in the world. The markets within the economy provide profit-motivated companies endless potential in the pursuance of pecuniary accumulation. Throughout the twentieth-century competitive companies have implemented modernized managerial procedures designed to raise profits by reducing unnecessary costs. These cost-saving procedures have had a substantial effect on society and particularly members of the working class. Managers and owners of these competitive and self-motivated companies have consistently worked throughout this century to exploit the most controllable component of the production process: the worker. The worker has been forced by the influence of powerful and affluent business owners to work in conditions hazardous to their well being in addition to preposterously menial compensation. It was the masterful manipulation of society and legislation through strategic objectives that the low-wage workers were coerced into this position of destitute. The strategies of the affluent fragment of society were conceived for the selfish purpose of monetary gain. The campaigns to augment the business position within the capitalist economy were designed to weaken organized labor, reduce corporate costs, gain legislative control and reduce international competition at the expense of the working class. The owners have gained and continue to gain considerable wealth from these strategies. To understand why the owners of the powerful companies operate in such a selfish manner, we must look at particular fundamentals of both capitalism and corporation strategy. Once these rudiments are understood, we ...
An employer who pays his employees the bare minimum will not see the same appreciation and respect as an employer who pays his employees livable wages. Lew Prince points out the various benefits that have come with paying his workers above the federal minimum since his business began. He states, “We’ve outlasted 20-store local chain and numerous regional and national chains. Most of these companies paid their employees minimum wage or barely above. My creative, dedicated, and better-paid employees won this life-or-death struggle for us” (Prince). Their loyalty also benefits Prince in the fact that he has to pay very little for employee turnover and constant training costs that other businesses struggle with. What Prince and many other business owners alike gain from higher wages reflects only a portion of the nation that will prosper from this monumental economical
Parrish. This is because there should be a law that protects the employees against employers. The employers and companies tend to be more powerful by having the ability to hire strong lawyers that would win court cases that are filed by regular employees. The minimum wage that is appointed by a state government makes sure that an employee’s rights are reserved and one is paid enough to be able to support their family. Also, the goals of the fourteenth amendment to the constitution which are the rights to life, liberty, and property should be
Many people in today’s world complain about how much Pro Athletes get pay. So I ask are Pro athletes overpaid? Look at it in this sense; they are living their dreams just like most business men do everyday. If you think that professional sports is not a job then just try to walk in the shoes of a athlete for a day. Sports, like medicine, healthcare, or software, are a business. In that business, owners pay their players what they deem they are worth.
Steve's salary while being the CEO of apple was $1 a year. Did you know that? He tried to show and teach his employees that money has no value. Although, he did own the majority of the shares in Apple, and that makes up for his $1 a year salary by A LOT. -- That is besides the point.
The question is why. The reason is simple. It’s greed. The more a CEO makes the more they want to make. The economy is no longer about providing a good or service for the population at large, but about amassing as much wealth as possible, and you’re stupid if you think you have the same opportunities to obtain wealth as those Wal-mart and Target CEOs. The truth is the deck is stacked against you, and it keeps getting worse as the world moves along its orbit. The economy has become based largely on the trading and selling of commodities, and the worker has become a cheap disposable commodity, to be used up by megalomaniacs who sit atop cash mountains, casting down crumbs as they see fit.
The minimum amount of money that must be paid to an employee by an employer in hourly basis, regardless of employee’s post or qualification, which often fixed by government authorities is known as minimum wages of that country. Currently federal minimum wages in United States is $7.25 which was last set at July 2009. Every year there is a huge debate at our country about raising minimum wages. Increasing minimum wage obviously has massive effect on the country’s economy and its people. Some experts say that, raising minimum wages can improve the life style of those employees who are under the poverty line. They believe that by raising the minimum wages net income of the working class will increase and helps to keep the financial balance in between the management level and the operational level employee. In contrast, there are other people who think that by rising the minimum wages can have negative effect is country’s economy since company can hire low number of staff to keep expenses low, resulting massive unemployment population in the country.
The controversy of athletes being overpaid dates back to 1922, when well-known baseball player George “Babe” Ruth received $50,000 within the first year of his career. Ruth’s extensive wealth was bolstered by dozens of endorsements (Saperecom). As it is shown in figure 1, in the Fortunate 50 Tiger Woods takes the number one spot for highest paid athlete. Tiger’s salary for 2011 is $2,294,116 and like Babe Ruth, his endorsements exceed his salary earning $60,000,000 making his total $62,294,116 (Freedman). It’s crazy to think that 89 years ago professional athletes scarcely made more than the average person today. This is of course not counting the inflation that has occurred since the years which Babe Ruth played baseball.
Sumo, V., & Weitzman, H. (2013). Are CEOs overpaid? The case against. Retrieved from Capital Ideas: http://www.chicagobooth.edu
Do athletes get overpaid? Is it fair that the average NFL player gets paid 1.9 million dollars a year while the average heart surgeon gets paid 533 thousand dollars annually? I think that professional athletes don’t get paid too much. There are multiple reasons that proves that their pay is not excessive. Their careers are short, they risk their body for our entertainment, and they motivate children.
They only make a little more than average household income. The CEOs, athletes, celebrities that do make millions of dollars are those who worked for it and therefore it is completely justifiable. People need to quit blaming others for their downfall instead of arguing about the pay gap between CEO and workers they should strive to become a CEO. Anything is possible, and everything is reachable with the correct
In thirteen years of golf, Tiger Woods has made over a billion dollars making him the highest paid athlete ever. He has been the highest paid athlete now for five years in a row. We all know that many people in the world watch him play every weekend and admire him, but is the amount of entertainment he provides really worth 128 million dollars a year? Tiger is only one of many professional athletes who are extremely overpaid. “People forget that sports is entertainment,” says Leonard Armato, a sports agent. Although professional athletes provide entertainment for millions of viewers around the world, they are overpaid because the millions of dollars that they make could be distributed more evenly throughout society and go to things of a greater cause.
Executive compensation has been studied for many years. While the average person probably does not think about it on a daily basis, it is necessary to watch trends. Tracking the amount of money they make as well as the bonuses, stock options, and other benefits shows how these executives are making such high rates of pay compared to the ordinary worker. Tracking how much an executive makes began in the 1930’s. Since this time not only has it been tracked but there have been many changes in the type of tracking, the tax laws and what is available as compensation. This paper highlights the changes that have occurred since the early 20th century until today and changes that still need to occur.