More handpicked essays just for you.
Counter arguments for why student athletes shouldnt be paid
Counter arguments for why student athletes shouldnt be paid
Counter arguments for why student athletes shouldnt be paid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
College athletes should not be paid
Do you think college athletes should be paid? Many people think college athletes should be paid like professional athletes, while others think they shouldn’t because they are basically already getting paid with scholarships. College Athletes should not be paid to play because they’re basically already getting paid with scholarships, schools might not make as much money as others, players might think the pay is unfair, and if one sports program gets paid, then all the other programs will demand to be paid.
A common argument against this position is that the athletes should be paid. Many of the colleges make hundreds of millions a year from people coming to see the athletes play. This being said many people think the players should each get a portion of that money, because they’re the ones bringing the major crowds in. People are failing to consider that college athletes are already
…show more content…
One article poses the issue with this hypothetical situation. They observe, “If the star on the team is paid more than a second stringer, then that will possibly cause tension between the two. This will lead to missed blocks, missed opportunities, and less chemistry between the overall team. It can also lead to players leaving the team” (Wilson 1). This being said some players might think it is unfair causing tension between them and their team leading to a possible switch in schools or dropping from the sport. When you are on a team, you are expected to show good class and be willing to help your team use temporary setbacks and losses to improve together. If one is making more money then another player, there might be break down in that team work. Players might try and get back at the team or school by not participating or trying very hard in practice and even
Tyson Hartnett of The Huffington Post once said “Even with any type of scholarship, college athletes are typically dead broke.” This quote regards a tremendous controversy that has been talked about for the past few years. He talks about whether or not college athletes should be paid for their duties. Despite the fact college athletes are not professionals, they should most certainly be paid for playing for their respective schools due to many factors. These factors include health risks and the income bring in for their colleges as well as to the National Collegiate Athletic Association.
Should college athletes receive pay for what they do? You’ve probably seen this pop-up a million times, and thought about it. You’ve probably figured why should they? Aren’t they already receiving benefits from a full-ride scholarship? But then an athlete will get caught up in a scandal like Johnny Manziel, where he signed footballs for money.. then you think well why shouldn’t he receive that money? And you then contradict yourself. But shouldn’t they receive money from outside sources, and then the benefits from the school. Not get a salary from the school just the benefits they’re already receiving, and money from sponsors. Wouldn’t that make sense considering the money they’re making the school? According to an ESPN report Alabama University makes $123,769,841 in total revenue from sports. (College Athletics Revenue) Yes ONE HUNDRED & TWENTY THREE MILLION. Yet an athlete from Alabama can only receive benefits from a scholarship.. That doesn’t seem right. You would want to be payed when the opportunity arises. It should only be fair these players get a piece of the revenue pie, after all they are the ones creating the revenue. The players should be getting benefits to allow them to pay for basic college needs, grow up to be responsible adults, and allow the NCAA to thrive. This would allow for the NCAA to truly thrive as a sporting association.
College athletes should be paid because of the huge amount of money being made off of the use of their athletic ability. The college basketball and football games that everyone watches on TV is no longer just a game, it is a business. The colleges and arenas hosting such events are not doing it solely for the love of sport, they are doing it for the money that will flow generously into their banking accounts. The coaches also, they are not volunteers, they are not there just for their love of the game, coaching is their job. The athletic directors, coaching staff, and event staff are all doing their job to put food on the table. The fans are watching the game, the players, the ones who are making huge sacrifices to be on the court. The athletes are the only ones in this circle of business who are putting in the hours, maybe even the most hours, and not getting a paycheck. It is time for a change, the fans, the players, and the NCAA is ready for it, it just has to be done. However, there are those out there fighting the other side of this battle, saying there is no need for these student athletes to be paid. Both sides have good points but one of them has great points.
...whole different world from professional sports considering they supply men with a family to help grow character with, supply them with a free education, and create a whole community of people that are loyal and generally remain loyal to one school. This bridge between the two sports could be majorly affected if college athletes were to be paid and would then bring up the issue about paying even high school athletes eventually. It is merely opening a can of worms and has been a tradition for so long that it should remain one for years to come. College athletes might not be receiving a full salary but that is not the point of it and they know what they are getting into when they commit to playing a sport. This long-standing barrier between professional and college athletics should remain how it is for the good of everyone but mostly the athletes and college programs.
College football has been a sport in American society for decades. Yet the players playing the sport are not receiving their fair cut of the prize. It has been debated whether or not college football players should get paid for playing. The supporters say that the players are not being compensated fairly and the non-supporters say that the education the players receive is payment enough. They also say that the universities the players attend are providing them with the basic necessities so they should not get paid. College football players should be paid though because they put their bodies at risk, make a lot of money for their school, and the play to entertain audiences.
In today’s society, one of the big controversies with sports is, should student athletes be be paid a salary? Some people believe that they should be paid and others would completely disagree. Even though they technically are being paid, they really are not. The only type of way the athletes would be paid is through financial aid or if they have a job. Only their education is being paid by the school. Although some people believe that they should be paid, it would not be a good idea at all. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to study and play a sport.
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
A question that has been rising to the surface lately is “should college athletes be paid a salary?” One cannot get on the internet now a day and not see some kind of college sport headline. The world of college sports has been changed greatly the past decade due to college athletes. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities. The athletes that provide and make a ton of revenue for the colleges also spend a huge amount of their time practicing and staying committed to sports, and have to maintain good grades in school which requires quite a bit of overtime. Because college athletes generate massive amounts of revenue and put in massive amounts of personal time for their individual universities, colleges need to financially compensate players for their contributions. The colleges that these superstars represent are reaping all of the benefits of the accomplishments the athletes have, yet the big named players are making nothing from what they do.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
College athletes do not receive a salary for their services in their athletic programs. Officials have debated for many years on the correct position on paying these student athletes, especially those in the larger profit gaining sports such as football and basketball. The debates have come to the similar conclusion that college players should not receive direct monetary compensation as an amateur athlete at any institution. This decision is appropriate for multiple reasons involving the athletes, administration, and universities as a whole. College athletes receive different scholarships that purchase tuitions and other learning materials.
There are many different ideas and plenty of controversy about if a college athlete should or should not get paid while playing for them even though they already have a scholarship. Many people believe that the athletes shouldn't get paid because its can take away from their competitive edge or even cause legal trouble for the school. I believe they deserve to be paid because they bring in tons of revenue for the school and it would also overcome some of the issue they face while being an athlete. In the NCAA right now they don't pay the athletes anything extra besides their scholarship because of the principle of amateurism.
There has been an extensive debate over the years about college athletes being paid and I honestly don’t see why there is a debate about it at all. The NCAA has strict rules about players receiving benefits from the school in forms of helping players and their families in the form of paychecks or even helping pay bills. College sports bring in an enormous amount of money for the schools every year and are expected to be given nothing in return. Sports do not only bring in money to schools but also more students and fans. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) have taken several players’ records and rewards from them for the simple fact of getting benefits from the school and that is just not acceptable (Allen 115). Athletes are just like every other student in the way of having to pay for housing, food, bills, and more. Having to balance school and sports gives athletes no time to have jobs which means they do not have a way to bring in money to pay for the essentials of going to
Should College Players Be Paid? There is a controversy on college players getting paid to play, I think that they should not be paid to play. Firstly, most of the athletes are awarded full-ride scholarships to college. For example, “Kicker Lucky for Free UCF Education” reporter for Orlando Sentinel Mike Bianchi, shares factual information on the paying of college athletes (Bianchi).
Louisville is up by four, Duke shoots the three, makes it, still up by one. But something's gone terribly wrong. Kevin Ware is on the ground after trying to block the shot. Perhaps one of the worst basketball injuries ever. His bone came out of his leg.
The second reason is fair and equal pay. If you are going to pay an athlete, then they should all get paid equally. That would be very hard because a lot of college athletes don't get aired on national television in front of a lot of people but some do. I don't feel like they should get paid as much if they were to get paid because they aren't in front of millions of people but that would not be fair because they work just as hard but some play at colleges that are not very popular or in different sports that aren't really