Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical Study of Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell
Critical analysis on shooting an elephant by george orwell
George Orwell on imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, Orwell comes across struggles with his conscience. Imperialism was a thought going through his head and was brought up throughout the story. The Burmese hated the Europeans and Orwell explains what they do to the targeted. Orwell also talks about why the Burmese should be mad at the Europeans. Another struggle he has was the shooting of the elephant and the events leading up to it. Although he had a hard time, Orwell manages to accept what he did and thinks he did what was necessary. The Burmese are obviously upset with the Europeans. He talks about it in the story in various ways; one scene would be when he talks about the European woman going through the bazaars. “But if a European woman went through the bazaars alone somebody would probably spit betel juice over her dress.” (Line 4). Although Orwell is a sub-divisional police officer of the town, he was still seen as a target, he “was hated by large numbers of people.” (line 1). This shows how no matter what or who you are, the Burmese are not pleased. …show more content…
Orwell describes it as “perplexing and upsetting.” (Line 13). Orwell says it himself, “in a job like that you see the dirty work of Empire at close quarters.” (line 17). In fact, the Burmese has many reasons to be mad at the Europeans. When Orwell describes the prisoners, “wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, crowd faces of the long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos.” (Line 17). He felt “an intolerable sense of guilt.” (line 20). As a result, Orwell does feel bad for the Burmese; He saw “imperialism was an evil thing.” (Line
In Orwell’s reflective narrative, “Shooting an Elephant”, he reveals the truth on imperialism. Through the utilization of irony and the method of appeals, Orwell shows the reader that imperialism is just a definition because the people are in control, not Britain.
George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is a short story that not only shows cultural divides and how they affect our actions, but also how that cultural prejudice may also affect other parties, even if, in this story, that other party may only be an elephant. Orwell shows the play for power between the Burmese and the narrator, a white British police-officer. It shows the severe prejudice between the British who had claimed Burma, and the Burmese who held a deep resentment of the British occupation. Three messages, or three themes, from Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” are prejudice, cultural divide, and power.
The state of power established through the imperialistic backdrop show that Orwell should have control over the Burmese. Orwell is a British colonial officer in Burma, which is under the control of the British, and because of this he should have authority and control over the Burmans. The presence of the empire is established when Orwell explains that, “with one part of my mind I thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny...upon the will of the prostrate people; with another part I thought that the greatest joy in the world would be to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest’s gut.” (144) This ideal imperialistic circumstance, where ...
He employs the possibility that the colonizers can easily forget that the colonizedthe Burmeseare human. The callous effect that colonization has on the natives is evident in the imprisonment of the Burmese. The narrator states, “the wretched prisoners huddling in the stinking cages of the lockups, the grey, cowed faces of the long-term convicts, the scarred buttocks of the men who had been bogged with bamboos” (Orwell 276). The narrator learns to play the role of a stereotypical colonizer which results in the line between his role and his personal identity being blurred. Powerless to resist the commands of colonialism, the police officer obeys what the British tells him to do leading to a shift in his sense of reality.
A police officer in the British Raj, the supposedly 'unbreakable'; ruling force, was afraid. With his gun aimed at a elephant's head, he was faced with the decision to pull the trigger. That officer was George Orwell, and he writes about his experience in his short story, 'Shooting an Elephant';. To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; (George Orwell, 283). In truth, the atmosphere of fear and pressure overwhelmed him. His inner struggle over the guilt of being involved in the subjugation of a people added to this strain, and he made a decision he would later regret enough to write this story.
Many young Englishmen did not work at their universities, but acquired a broad outlook and self confidence in complex problem solving. After his time at Eton, he was advised by a tutor to leave the life he claimed to be so dreadful, and go abroad to try to find employment. Orwell took that advice and the next year in 1922, he took a job working for the Indian Imperial Police in Burma, where he worked until 1927. Orwell was not very fond of the job, but knew the smart thing to do was to stay there, rather than leaving to seek employment somewhere else. He later wrote about this life experience in Burmese Days, published in New York in 1934, in which he writes about the frustration and humiliation of the job derived from the official relationship between the English and Burmese (British Writers, V7, 276-280).
In this story ,Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives presenting imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals. He is using the elephant as a symbol of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village. He uses a large and very powerful animal to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism.. In doing so he leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers. Orwell?s moral values are challenged in many different ways, ironically enough while he too was the oppressor. He is faced with a very important decision of whether or not he should shoot the elephant. If he does so, he will be a hero to his people. In turn, he would be giving in to the imperial force behind the elephant that he finds so unjust and evil. If he lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the...
George Orwell was a sub-divisional police officer in Lower Burma under the control of the British Empire. He did not like his job. He was bullied and hated by large numbers of people. As a police officer he states; “I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so” (Orwell 237). The feelings he had toward his job were
Orwell, George. Burmese Days. Orlando: Harcourt Books, 1934. Print. The utilized theme of Burmese Days is *****
Because of his official duties, the officer understands upfront the difference between real and fictional moralities of the British colonization history. The British believe that they colonized Burma because they are racially and culturally superior to them. They argue that imperialism is moral because they have saved the locals from their moral and cultural ignorance. Racial prejudice is clear from how the British see the locals, for instance, after the protagonist kills the elephant, the “younger men said it was a damn shame to shoot an elephant for killing a coolie, because an elephant was worth more than any damn Coringhee coolie” (Orwell).
In 1947, Orwell published “Why I Write”, an essay in which he outlined his goals and intentions as a writer. In it, Orwell states that he writes for “sheer egoism, aesthetic enthusiasm, historical impulse, and political purpose.” (Orwell, “Why I Write”), but then emphiatically describes at the end of his essay that his motives were not solely for “public purpose” (Orwell, “Why I Write”) or tools to enhance his popularity with the English reading public. Burmese Days, Orwell confesses, is the type of book he wanted to write because it contains unhappy endings, detailed descriptions and “purple passages” (Orwell, “Why I Write”) that are fragments of beautifully crafted phrases that show the magnificence of the English language. Unfortunately, it was poorly received and did not garner much att...
From the beginning of the narrative “Shooting An Elephant,” George Orwell creates a character with a diminished sense of self. The character narrates, “I was hated by large numbers of people -- the only time in my life that I have been important enough for this to happen to me” (Orwell, 58). All he wants is attention and it is evident that even negative attention is better than being ignored. He hates working for the British as a sub-divisional police officer in the town of Moulmein. He even makes it known to the audience that, “Theoretically -- and secretly, of course -- I was all for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British” (58). The character knows he does not want to be in this position, as a Anglo-Indian
In 1927, George Orwell joined the imperial police in Burma. During those times, the majority of the Burmese population had a strong bitterness and resentment for Europeans and their Imperialistic form of governing. In addition, many Burmese people had trouble accepting the Europeans who had a skin tone different from theirs. Orwell was yelled at and target by the Burmese people when they could get away with it. Ironically, Orwell did not believe in the Imperialistic form of government and secretly supported the Burmese people. Orwell despised the Burmese oppressor and hated the miserable and unjustified imperialistic justice and prison system.
The glorious days of the imperial giants have passed, marking the death of the infamous and grandiose era of imperialism. George Orwell's essay, Shooting an Elephant, deals with the evils of imperialism. The unjust shooting of an elephant in Orwell's story is the central focus from which Orwell builds his argument through the two dominant characters, the elephant and its executioner. The British officer, the executioner, acts as a symbol of the imperial country, while the elephant symbolizes the victim of imperialism. Together, the solider and the elephant turns this tragic anecdote into an attack on the institution of imperialism.
Orwell is an unhappy young policeman who lives in mental isolation. He hates British imperialism, he hates Burmese natives, and he hates his job. He is completely alone with his thoughts since he cannot share his idea that "imperialism was an evil thing" with his countrymen. Orwell sees the British rule as "an unbreakable tyranny, as something clamped down. . . upon the will of prostate peoples" because he observes firsthand the cruel imprisonments and whippings that the British use to enforce their control. Nor can he talk to the Burmese because of the "utter silence that is imposed on every Englishman in the East." This "utter silence" results from the reasoning behind imperialism that says, "Our cultures are different. My culture has more power than your culture. Therefore, my culture is superior in every way, and it will rule yours." If one is a member of a superior culture, one must not make jokes, share confidences, or indicate in any way that a member of the inferior culture is one's equal. A wall, invisible but impenetrable, stands between the British and the Burmese. His hatred for...