Sherlock Holmes In The Adventure Of The Speckled Band

860 Words2 Pages

Given the circumstances in the story “The Adventure of the Speckled Band”, Sherlock Holmes is not guilty of Dr. Roylott`s passing away. In the story, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the author, characterized Sherlock Holmes as a hired investigator who uses his skills to help solve Helen`s terrorizing case, yet he was at no means there to kill Dr. Roylott. Foremost, Sherlock Holmes could not predict that Dr. Roylott could be bitten by the snake. Furthermore, Sherlock Holmes was hired to protect Helen Stoner. Finally, Sherlock Holmes was certain that Dr. Roylott killed Julia Stoner and wanted to murder Helen due to money. Essentially, Sherlock Holmes was not the cause of Dr. Roylott`s death, given the fact that he could not predict the snake biting Dr. Roylott.
During the passage, along with while Sherlock investigated, he could not forecast that Dr. Roylott would be bitten by the snake. First and foremost, Sherlock did not come into contact with the snake, until he heard Dr. Roylott`s death yell, then saw it around the snake`s neck. To proceed, even though Holmes concluded the death of Julia to be caused by Dr. Roylott with a deadly snake, he could not do anything about the snake coming back into contact with Dr. Roylott. Nevertheless, Holmes was in the house to discover the cause of Julia`s death, not to guess that Dr. Roylott would be bitten by this snake. Formerly, …show more content…

In all regards, Sherlock was not able to foretell the snake biting Dr. Roylott. Coincidingly, Sherlock Holmes was brought along in order to help Helen Stoner with the frightening case, not have any part in the demise of Dr. Roylott. Moreover, Sherlock Holmes was more than positive Dr. Roylott murdered Julia by reason of money. Though, Sherlock Holmes did not know how Dr. Roylott passed away. In summation, Sherlock Holmes was not to be blamed for the death of Dr. Roylott, as to the coinciding points that sum up the

Open Document