Shakespeare's Read, To Reason Against Reading ! By Michael Mack

806 Words2 Pages

“How well he’s read, to reason against reading!”- William Shakespeare In September of 2008, Professor Michael Mack gave a speech to college freshmen at the Catholic university of America about his opinions on the importance of reading Shakespeare. Mack forges an effective argument that though reading Shakespeare is troublesome, it is well worth the effort through his use of counterclaims and rhetorical devices. The first technique that Professor Mack uses to advance his argument is his use of counterclaims. In the third sentence of the very first paragraph, Mack opens fire on the counterclaim, before he even addresses his allegations for why reading Shakespeare is favorable. “The obvious argument to the contrary is that reading Shakespeare is hard work- and not particularly rewarding, at least the first time round.” (Why Read …show more content…

“Why do you feel the way you do? Have other people felt this way before? What have they done about it, and how has it turned out?” (Why Read Shakespeare?, lines 118-120) Mack uses these questions to help him further explain how reading Shakespeare is beneficial to fully integrating your head and heart. The questions make the reader contemplate their own life, make them think that by reading Shakespeare, his plays, stories, and sonnetts, they will live a better life. In lines 66-75, Mack reasons that “...great books were thought of as mirrors.” He uses an analogy that is universally understood, to help the reader better understand his point of view. “What is more, as we hold the volume of Shakespeare in front of us, we see that it reflects not only the world around us, but also ourselves.” (Why Read Shakespeare?, lines 70-72) Professor Mack goes on to further explain that by reading Shakespeare, we can find a character that we relate to, or even a storyline in some cases. Shakespeare makes art, and art is supposed to make the viewer feel

Open Document