Senkaku Island Controversy

892 Words2 Pages

There are various claims from Japan and China about the sovereignty of the Senkaku Island. The Senkaku Island is located in the East China Sea between China and Japan, and it is also near to Taiwan. In the Qing dynasty, China announced that the Senkaku Island was belonged to Taiwan, but there was no specific historical evidence support this claim. Later, the war between Japan and China started, and the treaty of Shimonoseki was signed. The treaty stated that some places of China would be compensated to Japan. Some scholars said that the Senkaku Island was included in the compensation. Yet, the island was too tiny that there is no evidence that the treaty mentioned the Senkaku Island. In this condition, there are many claims about their ownership …show more content…

The Senkaku Island was considered as a “terra nullius” island by Japan, which means that there is no owner for that land. Therefore, under the international law, the island could be owed by them (McDevitt 101). Then, Japan surrendered in 1945, so Japan and the U.S. signed the U.S.-Japan Peace Treaty. At that time, the Senkaku Island was included in the treaty. In 1972, the U.S. returned the Okinawa and the island to Japan (McDevitt 102). In this case, both Japan and the U.S. considered the Senkaku Island was part of …show more content…

Moreover, he also points out a similar case that supports his claims. Scoville uses the case of the sovereignty conflict between Malaysia and Singapore. Malaysia had owed the Pedra Branca/ Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge, however, Singapore got the places because they had effective control for more than a decade. Even though Malaysia had acquired the places for around thirty years, the sovereignty will be lost if there is no effective control. Similarly, Japan had control over a longer period than Singapore controlled over the places. In other words, Japan should get the

More about Senkaku Island Controversy

Open Document