Two Parts Of The Self According To George Herbert Mead's Theory

823 Words2 Pages

There are two parts of the self according to George Herbert Mead’s theory which are the “I” and the “me”. The concept of the “I” is your own personal response to what society is thinking because as you’re growing you’re developing the “I”, the “I” is the self as a subject. The “me” is mainly focused on the view of society since “me” is reflecting to what you are or look like to others which the “me” is the self of an object. Even though the two parts are different and can conflict with one another, they are related because “ the behavior that still meets the “I’s” needs” (Mead 13). it is within the self, as Mead says, “that’s who we are, our actual self is the balance of both the “I” and the “me”” (Mead 2).
If I were to almost get into a car accident the two parts of self will conflict each other. The “I” would probably react in way, “thank god I avoided the accident”, “I saved my own life today”, or “I must be a good driver avoiding a …show more content…

Social unit is a group of people that interact together everyday such as your family, church, or school. Social structure is the social class such as upper, middle, and poor. Lastly, social institution is family, education, religion, government, and economy. The three social institutions all have to do what is in within the society and how it functions.
Social unit works in my family because we try to find commonality and connectedness with one another. Everyone in my family usually goes what society thinks or goes by. For example, Los Angeles has a baseball team, so many have the thought in mind oh they’re from Los Angeles so we have to favorite them. On the other hand, Los Angeles did not have a football team for year so I would favorite a team up north and my family wasn’t a fan of football anymore since the Oakland Raiders were in Los

Open Document