Security vulnerabilities are caused by flaws in code that are exploitable and are not caught before software is released. There are tools available to try and find such vulnerabilities after they have been coded, but these tools are often used after software changes are migrated to the later integration/testing phases of development. Software flaws would be much easier to find early, and less likely to occur at all, if the software is being properly analyzed and tested in a continuous integration environment with tests providing a high level of code coverage. Such a process complements and enhances the value of static analysis tools that scan code for known security flaws. A continuous integration process with high code coverage will:
Help reduce security flaws from being added in unexpected
…show more content…
Making this decision from the start on a new project enables those responsible for development and operations to make knowledgeable decisions about the architecture, design, and implementation with full consideration given to necessary security requirements. This process may mean choosing certain technologies over others based on security concerns. For instance, choosing to implement secure sockets layer (ssl) rather than sending data in the clear may improve application security. Being forced to make security decisions early may also mean that developers are incentivized to define expected development processes in a way that requires a certain level of security-focused unit test coverage for critical modules. For instance, employing tests to check that sql injection prevention is being employed properly. By enforcing these decisions through continuous integration, teams can use their existing Development practices to ensure an unwavering--yet attainable and efficient--focus on software
The Software Development Life Cycle is seldom used at my place of work. Unfortunately, recent developments in its use are deemed confidential. Due to this fact, this paper will examine in general terms one of the projects we are undertaking right now while at the same time attempting to maintain our confidentiality.
Software design and development is a field that requires various skills and abilities. Companies engaged in the development of software should provide an inclusive work environment where the different strengths of their employees are recognised, utilised and respected. Software development involves far more than programming skills. Personnel are required with strong communication, teamwork, attention to detail, creativity, design and problem-solving skills. Different personnel will possess these skills in varying proportions. It is the job of management to foster and encourage the development and enhancement of skills in the workplace.
Standardize procedures and project management. E.g. use the same language or coding and decoding of software.
Security helps the organization meet its business objectives or mission by protecting its physical and financial resources, reputation, legal position, employees, and other tangible and intangible assets through the selection and application of appropriate safeguards. Businesses should establish roles and responsibilities of all personnel and staff members. However, a Chief Information Officer should be appointed to direct an organization’s day to day management of information assets. Supporting roles are performed by the service providers and include systems operations, whose personnel design and operate the computer systems. Each team member must be held accountable in ensuring all of the rules and policies are being followed, as well as, understanding their roles, responsibilities and functions. Organizations information processing systems are vulnerable to many threats that can inflict various types of damage that can result in significant losses (Harris, 2014). Losses can come from actions from trusted employees that defraud the system, outside hackers, or from careless data entry. The major threat to information protection is error and omissions that data entry personnel, users, system operators and programmers make. To better protect business information resources, organizations should conduct a risk analysis to see what
It is well known that the team work is far better than performing a task individually. Such kind of practice plays a very important role in software engineering. A lot of things can be achieved together with the combination of diversified people, as they input different tactics and skills so that the main objective of a certain mission can be accomplished appropriately. Even though teaming up and working for a project is essential and helpful; there exist some issues that could bring interruptions and conflicts in the team.
...to detect security vulnerabilities. Whereas, binary level extensions can be placed, vulnerabilities can be modified with application of non-parallel statistical tests which makes the fuzzing process efficient in determining the weaknesses in the software programs and in identification of bugs.
In the world of software development, there are at least five risk management methodologies. Boehm’s Software Risk Management model focuses on the concept of “risk exposure” as defined by the relationship where the probability of an unsatisfactory outcome and the loss due to the unsatisfactory outcome determine the valence of the risk event. The method developed by Boehm is the original Risk Management
Rapid Application Development is a methodology that promises organizations the ability to develop and deploy strategically important systems more quickly, while simu...
Remaining focused on the overall goals and objectives of a project can become an issue if these are not consistently restated by managers or team leaders. Without the advantage of regular and ad hoc personal meetings, members of virtual teams may misinterpret, inadvertently change, or lose focus on the goals of the project. Because of this, individuals are charged with a greater responsibility to remain focused on both expected outcomes and objectives (Chinowsky & Rojas, 2003).
The Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) consists of phases used in developing a piece of software. It is the plan of how to develop and maintain software, and when necessary, replace that software. In 2007 during my hospital’s transition to a new software system, I was fortunate enough to be included in the process. I did not get involved until the implementation phase, but from then on, until now, I remain very active in the process. I decided to highlight the Waterfall Model of SDLC. The Waterfall Model is a “sequential development process” with each phase continuing in a line (McGonigle and Mastrian, 2012, p. 205).
Given the time, it takes to develop large sophisticated software systems it not possible to define the problem and build the solution in a single step. Requirements will often change throughout a projects development, due to architectural constraints, customer’s needs or a greater understanding of the original problem. Iteration allows greater understanding of a project through successive refinements and addresses a projects highest risk items at every stage of its lifecycle. Ideally each iteration ends up with an executable release – this helps reduce a projects risk profile, allows greater customer feedback and help developers stay focused.
As ineffective customer collaboration may render the other recommendations redundant, effective customer collaboration seems to be a key factor for successful distributed agile development. In addition, we complement the existing recommendations by introducing an additional recommendation: i.e. enable and support direct communication between the developers. Unexpectedly, the teams in the second case were not allowed to communicate directly with each other. To compensate, a managementled communication channel was established to balance the communication flow,
Agile leaders help individuals to grow continuously and not encourage to bring new ideas. The Ideas that trigger positive change. But in order to foster structured change and create innovative organization, IT processes, roles and responsibilities, and quality management needs to be well understood and well defined, which helps improve IT governance performance. At the same time, agile leadership must device a continuous agile delivery across structural and architectural quality factors of the software. That quality delivery framework must check everything from security, robustness and performance in addition to functional aspects of the product. Compound all that with applications running in cloud. So agile leaders must design a fast paced, multifaceted testing environment that can keep up with a face paced agile software releases. So automation comes very handy in an agile testing organization. The right level of scale in a continuous integration environment is crucial to ensure that software quality is not compromised. A true leadership comes from simplicity and agility while a good IT decision making and governing process is in place. Leadership welcomes change and work as an enabler to focus on what is next. Leaders keep their eyes on the value for the business. Focus on what makes sense for the business
Electronic hacking - a silent perpetrator, breaking through our defenses unnoticed. These silent criminals are way more dangerous than they seem. It is one of the most easiest, yet most treacherous types of offenses. This can be done through the Internet, electronic devices, and even personal personal accounts can get hacked. There are numerous threats that hacking brings to our world today. Despite this appalling fact, there are measures we can take to prevent it. Electronic hacking can be a deadly in many ways, but there are ways to prevent being affected.
...times developers may not carry out quality assurance test (which make sure that the software is in pristine condition), and as a result of this, there could be problem with the software. Testing software before it’s rolled out for clients is really important, because it could cause huge losses both for the developer and the client who are going to make use of it. Even though a developer cannot be charged (as long as he is not liable) for bugs that causes damage, but the reputation of the developer comes to stake.