Scripture: The Sinful Nature Of Jesus Christ

1567 Words4 Pages

In the field of Christology, the sinless nature of Jesus Christ is reasonably uncontested. Specific scripture confirms that Jesus is “without sin,” “knew no sin,” and “committed no sin” (Hebrews 4:15, 2 Corinthians 5:21 and 1 Peter 2:22). That reality aside, there is significant debate over Jesus’ inherent ability to commit sin. While Scripture affirms that Christ didn’t sin – could he have? Put another way, did Jesus share our postlapsarian “fallen” human nature or was he free from what Augustine termed ‘original sin?’ The essence of this argument dates back to the earliest Christian thinkers and even today, evades complete consensus. One side of the debate contends that Christ’s human nature was not subject to post-Adamic fallenness. Adherents claim that a sinful nature would have prevented Jesus from assuming his position as true intermediary, and that “(Christ’s) role as …show more content…

5:21, Rom. 8:3) carried with it profound implications on Christ’s humanity. In wrestling with this dilemma, these early church fathers desired to “affirm the closest possible identification of Christ with the rest of humanity,” but were reticent to fully espouse the possibility that Jesus could closely identify with sin. This reticence ended when Augustine of Hippo concluded that Christ’s incarnate humanity was utterly untouched by this fallen nature due to his understanding of ‘original sin.’ Augustine believed that Adam’s fall from grace not only induced human beings to sin, but actually rendered them “congenitally sinful.” Prior to the Fall, humans had the “ability not to sin (posse non peccare),” yet postlapsarian humans, were rendered incapable of avoiding sin (non posse non peccare). According to this logic, Christ – who is without sin – could never have assumed the flesh of normal human beings. Thus his humanity was distinct and set apart. Augustine

Open Document