Science

1574 Words4 Pages

For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it involve a misunderstanding of science or of knowledge?

For many persons science is considered the supreme form of all knowledge, as science is based on facts and theories and it reaches its results through an approved scientific method. Consequently, it seems to be objective and thus more truthful and reliable. However, other persons argue that this is a misunderstanding of science. Hence, one should question what science and knowledge entail. Can there actually be some form of knowledge that overrules all other types of human knowledge? Is scientific knowledge actually always objective? Are there other types of knowledge of equal worth? This essay will discuss the views presented mainly using examples from biology and history and comparing them to the different ways of knowing, i.e. perception, reasoning, emotion and language to try and reach a conclusion on whether scientific knowledge really is a higher form of knowledge.

Firstly, before attempting to discuss the topic at hand, it is important to define the terms “knowledge”, “science” and “supreme”. According to Webster’s Encyclopaedic Dictionary “knowledge” is defined as “the acquaintance with facts, truths, or principles gained by sight, experience, or investigation”1. “Science” is a branch of knowledge that has purpose to “describe, explain, understand, investigate, predict, and control”2. The term “supreme” is defined as “the highest in rank, authority, and/or quality”3. Now, to put these definitions in context, one must recognise that scientific knowledge, to have the status of the highest in authority and quality, it has to be reliable and consistent with reality. And since scientific knowledge is based upon investigations and observations of the environment around us (i.e. reality), it must be supreme. However, what can be questioned is the degree of supremacy within different types of sciences, and in this essay the comparison will be limited to one natural science (biology) and one social science (history).

Biology could be considered the supreme form of knowledge, as a large proportion of what we know is based upon observations and investigations of the world around us, thus inductive reasoning. Let’s consider the example of organs in living organisms; it’s a scientific fact that most living org...

... middle of paper ...

... our perceptions, way of reasoning, and the language used, thus the scientific knowledge we have created is also subjective.
Bibliography Books

Abel, Reuben. Man Is the Measure. New York; The Free Press, 1976.

Acton, Edward. Rethinking the Russian Revolution. Arnold Publishers, 1990.

Pipes, Richard. Den Ryska Revolutionen. Stockholm; Natur och Kultur, 1990.
Dictionaries

Webster’s Encyclopaedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. 1989, Gramerce Book, New York.
1 Webster’s Encyclopaedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. 1989, Gramerce Book, New York. p. 792.

2 Abel, Reuben. Man Is the Measure. New York; The Free Press, 1976. p. 82

3 Webster’s Encyclopaedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language. 1989, Gramerce Book, New York. p. 1430.

4 Pipes, Richard. Den Ryska Revolutionen. Stockholm; Natur och Kultur, 1990. p. 161

5 Acton, Edward. Rethinking the Russian Revolution. Arnold Publishers, 1990. p. 238

6 Abel, Reuben. Man Is the Measure. New York; The Free Press, 1976. p. 82

© Copyright 2005 Cassandra Flavius (FictionPress ID:375156). All rights reserved. Distribution of any kind is prohibited without the written consent of Cassandra Flavius.

Open Document