Rousseau's Argument Analysis: Black Lives Matter Toronto

412 Words1 Page

Summary: On July 5th, 2016 Black Lives Matter Toronto staged a thirty-minute protest at the Toronto pride parade, which caused the paraded to come in halt; based on this scene, many of the people debated whether the protest was justified and including if the protest was hurt or help it caused. The organization had been invited to participate in the parade and they were honored guest, but they were called “Honored Group.” When the protest took place Black Lives Matter Toronto (BLMTO) demands of many issues which included the “better representation of black gay individuals in Pride Toronto staffing and hiring and a commitment to continued space, funding and logistical support for black gay youth.” Not only that, they also wanted all police banned from the marches and pride. Parade organization agreed to their demands so, they can’t cause any more trouble; but, on …show more content…

This may relate to the two famous philosophers Hobbes and Rousseau debates. Hobbes felt that everyone is born selfish and will only seek personal interest, which would fall under the head of the pride parade because he/she signed the list of demands so, they can get the parade moving. Whilst, on the other hand, Black live matter protest would fall under Rousseau’s debate because he felt that people’s natural state was one of freedom and peace and people come together and establish a basic sense of equality. BLMTO believe that there wasn’t better representation of black gay individuals and that was one of the main reasons for the protest – their protest wasn’t even illegal! In Canada, we are allowed to democratic protest. The issue was they didn’t want the police showing up to parade while being armed, BLMTO wanted everyone included and safer for the black community. This also goes against the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom because it states freedom of peace assembly, freedom of association and

Open Document