More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the difference between romeo and juliet movie and book
Differences romeo and juliet movie and book
Differences romeo and juliet movie and book
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Boom, the trigger of the gun is pulled, Juliet is dead. This is not what would be expected out of a play written in the 15th century people would expect a person dying from a wound from a sword. Juliet dying of a gun wound is an example of a difference that happened in the movie Romeo + Juliet. Romeo and Juliet was made into a movie called Romeo + Juliet shown in 1996 by Baz Luhrmann. Between the play and the movie there are many similarities, and differences such as the language used, the weapons, and the technology available.
One similarity between the movie Romeo + Juliet and the play Romeo and Juliet is that the movie is the language used. An example of this is when in the play it states, “'Tis torture and not mercy” (Shakespeare 3.3.29,
In the movie Romeo + Juliet the characters use guns when in the book Romeo and Juliet they use swords and light arms. An example is when Sampson says, “My naked weapon is out. Quarrel! I will back thee” (Shakespeare 1.1.30). A reason the director of the film could have done this is if the director wants the film to show that the film is more recent in history. Another reason is, to add more plot details with the guns to entice more people to watch the movie. The director could have also wanted people to feel that the film is more reliable in the sense that it does not take place in the past. The guns also added in a way more of an adventure to the movie version from the old outdated version. Taking guns out of the movie also could have been beneficial because it could attract an even new audience. The addition of guns was a difference from the book, and added extra options for the movie to use for new plot
One example is in the movie when Romeo goes to Juliet’s house and tries to meet her. In him trying this he makes a noise, and it cuts to a scene where a security guard can be obviously seen with multiple screens and monitors for watching for intruders (Luhrmann).In the play Romeo sneaks by and is not caught. Doing this the director shows that the story he is trying to represent is not an outdated boring story. A reason he could be doing that is to have the movie be interesting for a wider audience and connect with more people. Another reason is that he could be looking for a way to put a new spin on an old story to have more people remember him. The director doing this could have also been, so the movie would be able to get newer, more popular actors to take an interest in it. With these points into consideration, it is a reasonable answer to tell the direction the director took with his version of Romeo and Juliet was the right idea as it would bring in more people and benefit more people.
There are many differences and similarities between Romeo and Juliet and Romeo + Juliet. One similarity was the Old English used in both the play and the movie. The director kept this the same to keep some people interested with the weird uncommon language used. There were also two differences the first being the guns used in the movie, and the swords used in the play. The
Romeo and Juliet is a play about two lovers who have to risk their lives in order to demonstrate their love and will to stay together, regardless the feud between their families. By the end, the death of Romeo and Juliet finally bring the reconciliation to these two families. It is fate that the two most shall-not meet people fall in love and it love that eventually won against hatred. Since then, there have been many different versions of Romeo and Juliet, whether it was for film, stage, musicals. These different recontextualised adaptions change the original play by many ways, some modernise the language, environment, props as well as changing the original characteristics of some characters. Out of all the different adaptions of Romeo and Juliet, two stood out the most. One was the Romeo and Juliet (1996) and directed by Baz Luhrmann and the other one was Romeo and Juliet Broadway (2013) play version,
Contrasts between Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s Romeo and Juliet There are many differences, large and small, between Zeffirelli and Luhrmann’s version of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. After seeing the first scene of both of these films, some notable contrasts became clear. The props used in both films differ greatly, in the 1967 version, very dated costumes were used, it looked like the director wanted a medieval style to be shown in the film judging by the costumes and props used. Real swords were drawn by the Capulet's and the Montague’s as the play suggests but the fighting seemed quite unbelievable to a modern day viewer as did some of the stalls used in the small market surroundings. However, in the newer 1997 version of the film, an entirely different approach was used, instead of swords, guns were used and a petrol station was where the first scene began as apposed to a small medieval market.
William Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet," set in 16th century Verona, Italy shares differences with Baz Luhrmann's "Romeo + Juliet," set in modern day Verona Beach. These stories contain the same characters and conflict, however major and minor discrepancies are galore in the story lines of both formats of William Shakespeare's creation. Some major inconsistencies occur, such as Mercutio dying at a beach, portrayed as a hero, instead of being at a bar, looking like a fool, Friar Lawrence's letter is successfully sent to Romeo by mail carriers, however he does not have the opportunity to read it, unlike in the play version, where Romeo does not get the letter from Friar John, and is told the news by Balthazar, and nobody being at Juliet's tomb to stop Romeo from reaching Juliet, unlike in the play, Paris was there to pay his respects to Juliet. In addition to the major inconsistencies, minor ones are included throughout, such as Romeo and Juliet first seeing each other through a fish tank, then kissing in the elevator, not the dance, the famous balcony scene occurring in a pool, not on an actual balcony, and Juliet pointing a gun at Friar after she points it to herself, threatening to commit suicide. These inconsistencies probably occurred in the play to add a modern and entertaining twist to the Shakespearean classic, leading to the same denouement in both versions of "The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet."
Paramount aspect of the movie and the play, the theme, were the same, and the overall messages in both were the same. For example, one main message in the stories was that love conquers all. This was demonstrated in both the play and the film when Romeo and Juliet kept secretly meeting each other even though they knew it was against their families’ wishes. In one scene of both the movie and the play Romeo and Juliet even got married and died together so that even if they could not be together on earth they would be together in death.
Romeo and Juliet - Movie vs. Book & nbsp; Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend. They are correct. It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet was written. centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo. and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts. The play had better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a better presentation of the. & nbsp; One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood. An example of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and Juliet is very serious. The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4).
The two plays, Romeo and Juliet and Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, have many differences and similarities. Obviously since they were both written by William Shakespeare, then they will have some similarities because a majority of writers have similar traits in how they write each play, novel, movie, etcetera… Romeo from Romeo and Juliet and Brutus from Julius Caesar have an abundant amount of similarities and differences throughout both plays. A majority of the characters had similarities and difference as well, but Romeo and Brutus’s stood out the most to the readers. Romeo and Brutus both did something detrimental that ended up being the cause of their lovers suicide, but it was for different reasons. Then the way that Romeo did not
This essay shows the subtle differences that can occur between directors, even when they are basing the movie off of almost the exact same script. Almost no two movies are exactly alike, no matter how hard the directors and actors might try. Minor personality differences and scene changes greatly affect the atmosphere and meaning of the same movie. One example of this is the movie Romeo and Juliet. This movie tells the gripping story of two young lovers who are forbade to see each other because of a viscous feud between the two families. I'll be looking at the older 50's version of Romeo and Juliet and comparing it to the newer version of Romeo and Juliet.
The Major Differences Between Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were
There are many differences between Luhrmann’s 1996 and Zeffirelli’s 1968 versions of Romeo and Juliet. One of these differences is the setting and time era. Zeffirelli’s version is more fitting of Shakespeare’s idea of the time era – it is all very renaissance. They start out with a tournament, they use swords, and they dress to their part. Another difference is culture. In the new version, the movie starts in the city, and it is a fight between the Montague’s and the Capulets. Perhaps the most important between the two versions is the religions and beliefs of the people as a whole.
Romeo and Juliet is about purity. That´s what Romeo and Juliet are, a story of two young teenagers, against odds, falling in love in an absolutely beautiful way. The 1996 version ruins this purity by having the two lovers die in front of each other. It takes away the feel of originality. The play didn't need extra drama, and neither should the movies. The story line involves, the non adulation of two rebellious youth who decided to fall into a perfect world. Their death is suppose to be a tragic tale, in which fate killed them. This story doesn't need the excess drama of Romeo and Juliet dying in each other's
There are several ways that the time period of the Romeo and Juliet movie affects the way the audience views the story. One example of this is that it is a little more acceptable for Juliet to talk back to her parents. It is not a respectful thing for her to do, but because of when the movie takes place it is not emphasized as much. Another thing that is different is the use of guns instead of swords. I believe the director used this because people do not use swords in this time period, and the audience can connect with the characters in the movie better because of these changes. One other thing that was different from the play was what kept the letter about Juliet from getting to Romeo. In 1996, there was not a concern for the plague, so the
The movie adds a musical twist to the original Romeo and Juliet, which gives the story a lighter look than the original. Instead of bloody fights, the movie puts in dance and singing scenes. The characters are also different because some of them are in relationships, while others even completely change their roles. For example, Bernardo is Maria’s brother in the story, while in the original play Tybalt plays her cousin. The nurse is also not in a relationship with anyone, while Anita is in a relationship with Bernardo and that fact drastically changes the storyline.
Romeo and Juliet, a story of a tragic romance between two young lovers. And within the story you find that it is different from the book to the movie. While reading the book you notice some differences between it and the movie. While watching the movie you see one difference and it is that instead of swords like the book they have guns and they called them swords. They did this as a result of the movie is in a more modern time than the book. Another difference is when Mercutio is making Romeo go to the party. In the book he talks him into going to the party. In the movie Mercutio made him take a tablet or pill of some kind to make him go. Still the same as the other difference, still in a more modern era.
In the classic tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, the characters use swords as a source of weaponry instead of guns as illustrated in the film. Also in the classic tragedy, horses were used for transportation instead of cars. In the film light is used in various scenes, however in the classic tragedy candles are used. This shows that Baz Luhrmann strategically studied the 1597 Shakespearean play of Romeo and Juliet to make it more suitable to a modern day audience.
The movie version of Romeo and Juliet stars two popular young actors, Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes. In some ways it is very much like the original, but at the same time very different.