Comparing Alice's Adventures In Wonderland And The Phantom Tollbooth

1272 Words3 Pages

While written in different time periods, Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Norton Juster’s The Phantom Tollbooth seem to have an underlying commonality; using the power of literary nonsense, they react against and critique societal ideals and values, whilst subtly urging children to stray away from convention and conformity. At the beginning of each story, the child protagonists are shown to be oppressed by their societies in different ways. Alice’s Victorian society seems to be preventing her from coming into a true sense of self; While Milo’s 20th century society leaves him stuck as an uninterested, unthinking, and disconnected child. It is not until both Alice and Milo enter these nonsensical dream worlds that they embark …show more content…

Ironically, the education system fails to emphasize the importance of knowledge, leaving Milo to conclude “the process of seeking knowledge as the greatest waste of time of all” (9). This seems to be Juster’s greatest critique of society, and is the driving force of the story as Milo’s quest is to unite the ‘Kingdom of Wisdom’. In order to do so he must discover the inconsistencies within Dictionopolis and Digitopolis, make it through the “Land of Ignorance”, and bring Rhyme and Reason back to the Kingdom. The fact that a child is able to do this shows that Juster is challenging the notion that age comes with Wisdom. In this world, words are used to turn things around and silence. This is further demonstrated in Milo’s interactions with adults in this story. When Milo encounters Officer Shrift in Dictionopolis, Milo sees that he is making up the rules as he is going along (similar to what Alice experiences in Wonderland at the trial). And like the Queen of Hearts in Alice’s Adventures, he decides everyone is guilty right away. He turns everything Milo says upside down and in every way Milo attempts to outsmart him, Office Shrift changes the rules (quite humorously), thus using his words as a way exert his power enabling him to berate and silence those who go against him. For when Milo tries to outsmart the police officer by stating that “only a judge can sentence you” (62) Officer Shrift turns that around stating “Good point, … I am also the judge” (62) or when Milo says that “Only a jailer can put you in prison,” (63) to which Officer Shrift retorts “I am also the Jailer” (63). Perhaps this is Juster’s way of critiquing the Justice system. It is because of this lack of reasonableness that shows the need for Rhyme and Reason to come back to the Kingdom – to restore balance once again. King Azaz also works to show the ways in which the Adults try to exert power over children at the Royal Banquet.

Open Document