Risk Management Case Study Essay

344 Words1 Page

a. On 16 September 2015, the following high risk deficiencies were identified and submitted to Mr. Matthew Thomas (Training Support Chief) and to Mr. Dirk Kellar (Safety Director) for immediate actions. 1) Fall hazard. 5 each anchor points used to secure the end of the rappel rope, mounting to the floor surface were loose due to the lack of maintenance. (29 CFR 1926.500 and PL 91-596) RAC 2=High Recommendation: Submit a work request to have the anchor points inspected, replaced and load tested to support the load capability of 5, 000 pounds per individual. 2) Fall hazard. Located throughout the structural, all the wooden hand/guard railings and toe board around the opening were not properly secured or excessively …show more content…

It was noted that several stairs metal treads was loose. IAW 29 CFR 1910.24, all guard rails must be at a minimum of 42 feet high and capable of withstanding a side force of 200 pounds. RAC 2=High Recommendation: Submit a service order to have the metal treads mounting bolts inspected, tighten or replaced as needed. 4) Observation: Located throughout the structure it was annotated that several wooden main or support beams were badly cracked or deteriorating due to environmental conditions. Recommendation: Submit a work request to have a DPW Structural Engineer to conduct a structure assessment of the cracked or deteriorating beams. b. Observation: Structure integrity. It was observed that bolts and nuts hardware used to connect structural members and support beams were not properly connected/tightened due to the hardware being of various dimensions. RAC 3=Moderate Recommendation: Submit a work request to have a DPW Structural Engineer to conduct a structure integrity assessment. c. Structure maintenance. The tower wall face had several boards that was broken, loose or decayed. (Rappel Site Inspection Checklist) RAC 3=Moderate Recommendation: Submit a work request to the broken, lose or decayed boards

Open Document