Summary: The Unstructured Clinical Approach

742 Words2 Pages

Department of health (2007) say that there are 3 types of risk assessment:the unstructured clinical approach, the actuarial approach and the structured clinical approach (DOH 2007). Many Mental health Professionals over the past years have used the unstructured clinical approach to risk assess. This is based on your experience and judgement to assess the risk. However this way has been criticized for not being structured and this then leads to inconsistency and to be unreliable (Turner and Tummy 2008). This approach would not be useful for the case with Julie as she is not known to services and every person is different as you may not have seen her symptoms before if you base the risk assessment on experience.
The actuarial approach is …show more content…

The main area of risk you would have to look at would be previous episodes of violence/ self harm for Julie and what assessment tool for this risk would be used, this should be examined in great detail. For Julie this has been past episodes of violence so this would be a big risk for her but there is no past history of self harm. This does not mean that an assessment should not be carried out for the self harm risk as this may become a risk in the near future with Julie. To assess Julie’s risk of violence there are many different tools which could be used to help assess this. For Julie’s case the HCR-20 may be used as this a widely used …show more content…

It informs the person which is doing the assessment, relevant issues in the person’s past, evaluating the present risk and informing of future risk. Each is then coded on a three point scale (absent, possibly present or definitely present). The problem with this tool is that is only works for about 67% of the time, this could be down to the fact that the information obtained from the person may be false, it also only focuses on the risk of violence. Another Assessment tool which could have been used is GRiST:Galatean Risk Screening tools, like the other tools is assesses the same areas but it focuses on all areas of risk. It is based on the expertise of the Multidisciplinary health practitioners, that identify detailed information about all areas of risk. All these tools are useful in assessing the risk of a patient, it is easy to assess a person for risk, but the problem is how to prioritize what risk is greater. The only way that we can prioritize their safety is when the risk of them coming to harm is greater than their ability to manage the risk (Lloyd 2010). These tools are very good to risk assess Julie’s for any violence problems, once these assessments are completed it will help nurse's come up with a plan to help reduce the risk

More about Summary: The Unstructured Clinical Approach

Open Document