Rio Tinto Case Study

882 Words2 Pages

As you can see, as the economy increases the environments safety deteriorates. As Per Capita Income increases it eventually reaches the Turning Point Income. The turning point income shows that the environment starts to improve with a growth in Per Capita Income consequently decreasing the environmental deterioration that has been made. However, as a country becomes a developed nation it decides to outsource its industries towards developing countries. These developing countries still have a weak economy with little governmental regulation. In effect the environment of these countries are destroyed at the expense of the developed nation’s economy growing stronger. The reason is because developed nations have strict environment regulations and …show more content…

Rio Tinto, whose headquarters are situated in Europe; London, United Kingdom a developed country. The corporation Rio Tinto brought on a stamped loss of biodiversity in the region, both because of the formation of the mining regions themselves and by the unsustainable misuse of the area. When MNCs guides their globalization endeavors to ranges of moderately poor countries with rich land and rich biodiversity, a low environmental standard will inevitably lead to habitat destruction and species endangerment. Rio Tinto has perceived the need to execute changes as a reaction of government regulation expanding. Their key initiatives are developing climate change scenarios and business implications for key regions, Engaging in research partnerships that are analyzing climate change impacts and Building climate risk awareness and expertise among business units and staff (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions 84). Rio Tinto has implemented risk analysis and management process which has been categorized into classes, one through four, four needing immediate attention. The risk analysis and management must consider the accompanying five sorts of monetary outcomes capital expenditure, schedule, operating cost, production volumes, and revenue. It likewise incorporates the outcomes of health impacts, environmental impacts, community …show more content…

Homogeneity of products is depicted as goods and services that are same or comparable in nature. Since goods are homogenous, firms feel committed to vie for any relative point of interest that they can increase over their opposition. The more homogeneous the product in any industry the further we would expect to see competition (Spar and Yoffie 155). Another factor is transaction costs, the more difficult and time consuming a relocation will be the less likely it will occur. The stickiness is the resistance of a cost to change, in spite of changes in the more extensive economy recommendation of an alternate cost is ideal. Generally, it implies that the costs charged for specific goods and service are hesitant to change despite changes in input cost or demand patterns. Since, most firms cannot switch plant locations freely as most, it will bring around considerable expenses from moves crosswise over fringes. The higher these expenses, the stickier investments will prove to be and stickier investments will evidently decrease the momentum for the race to the bottom. These factors contribute greatly to differences in industry structure and incentives. In addition, there also exist invisible costs such as hiring and training new employees, building contracts etc. Prerequisites must be met, for example,

Open Document