Richard III Essay

729 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Dramatic technique in Richard III

Richard III is a play written by William Shakespeare that involves the battle of two men by the names of Richard and Richmond. These two men are not simply rivals; however, they are in fact brothers who happen to both be fighting for the royal crown to become the next king. The word Machiavellian is defined as a person who is devious, two-faced, and scheming. Both Richard and Richmond attempt to make the other candidate appear to be inconsiderate and not of best fit for a position of power. Richmond is a more Machiavellian character in that he is a fighter which goes along with winning and he is trying to seize power to rule England. Richmond is an ancestor of Shakespeare’s patron which in a way makes him appear like he is some sort of God …show more content…

Richmond is essentially entitled to the throne because of his relations to Shakespeare. He also ended the War on Roses by himself. The War on Roses contained multiple battles in hopes of winning power which would put Richmond in control. The two competitors were those in support of the Royal House of Plantagenet. They came from both Lancaster and York. These battles started in the year 1455 and finally came to an end in 1485. Richmond has an exceedingly inflated ego; however, he does back that up by being a fierce warrior and besting Richard III in combat. Considering Richmond is so noble, he certainly is entitled. On the other hand, he does not simply want to be the King just to help but because he is also getting something out of this deal that helps him. He is battling Richard not simply for fun but to become a ruler of a kingdom, to unite the two …show more content…

These actions are not the ordinary competitive actions. These actions are far more intense and deceiving. Richard is more straight-forward and conspicuous whereas Richmond tends to put more thought into his plotting. He is vastly strategic in the way he leads his army towards Richard to replace him. He gives his men orders and tells them exactly where to go. The night before the battle takes place, both Richard and Richmond gives their men a speech which varies tremendously in the tone they are given. Richard addresses his men in a demanding and stern way whereas Richmond is more polite and peaceful. He tells his men, “God and our good cause fight upon our side” (5.3.254) and calls Richard “a base foul stone, made precious by the foil of England’s chair” (5.3.265-267). By saying this, he is attempting to show his men that they have nothing to worry about and that since Richard is an enemy of God, God will be on their side. Richmond is trying to convince the people that Richard will simply let the power get to his head and he will not actually do any good for them. He is being manipulative when he says this which is also a part of

Show More
Related

  • Alais 'The Lion In Winter'

    614 Words  | 2 Pages

    First power, amongst the royal family the mother, Eleanor is the Queen; the father is King Henry, the youngest son John, middle son Geoffrey, and oldest son Richard. In the play not one, but all of these characters have power in some kind of way. King Henry spent his life conquering many regions and wants to continue to conquer by passing king down to one of his three sons. A quote from the play that shows the greed that having power can create Henry asked, “Isn’t being chancellor power enough?” Geoffrey replies, “It’s not the power I feel deprived of. It’s the mention I miss.” Geoffrey does not think he will receive enough respect if he is just the chancellor and his younger brother John is king. When he comes to Richard, the oldest brother he thinks he should be king because of his army he has behind him, but this is where futility comes into play. It is not always about war and killing people to prove your powerful, but in Richards’s ways that is the only way. Richard says, “I am a constant soldier, a sometime poet, and I will be king.” This quote describes the type of person Richard wants to be, he wants to have all the power to rein over the castle and do it through war. Each of the family members is jealous of one another especially the children of the king and queen, it is pretty much a sibling rivalry between them. Having power can be a good thing or bad thing, in this situation the king and queens children have a different view on having power and what they would do if crowned

    Read More

  • Richard III's Usurpation and His Downfall

    687 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another cause for his unpopularity was the question of benevolences. When he was crowned Richard promised to stop the use of benevolences as this was particularly disliked by the nobles. However because of the war with Scotland , the threat of Henry and rebellions Richard had to later ask for benevolences once again. This made him even more

    Read More

  • Richard III and Looking For Richard Connections

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    To explore connections between texts is to heighten understanding of humanity’s progressing values and the underlying relevant themes that continue to engage societies regardless of context. William Shakespeare’s King Richard III (1592) (RIII) and Al Pacino’s docudrama Looking for Richard (1996) (LFR) demonstrate how opinion is created through comparative study, both explore the struggle for power within differing contexts to determine the duplicity of humanity. Ultimately, despite the divergent eras of composition and textual form, these connections expose the relevant social commentaries of their composers, highlighting innately human values, which remain constant.

    Read More

  • The Director's Notes on Richard III

    882 Words  | 2 Pages

    Anne is quite like a modern woman in the way that if a man tells her

    Read More

  • Black Boy Essay

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Richard’s pride is shown when he refuses to fight Harrison for white men’s entertainment. When Richard initially rejects the white man’s offer of five dollars for him to fight with Harrison, it is out of pride. Richard shows his pride quite a lot though out the novel. “’Then let’s figh...

    Read More

  • Richard III Villain Quotes

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    “I am determined to prove a villain / and hate the idle pleasures of these days. / Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous, / by drunken prophecies, libels and dreams.” Richard III, the evil Duke of Gloucester, is fighting a bloody road to the crown in Shakespeare's dramatic play. Stopped by nothing and with brilliant intelligence, Richard fights his way to the king’s position, clothing his villany with “old odd ends stolen out of holy writ.” With no one to fully trust, Richard breaks many hearts by killing all people in his way, and becomes the unstoppable villain. He hides behind a shield of kindness and care, but when he is alone, his real soul comes alive. Sending murderers, or killing people himself, he has no mercy. Manipulating Lady Anne to marry him and promising Buckingham rewards for his deeds, he knows what he is doing, and won’t stop until the crown lies at his feet.

    Read More

  • A Study of the Dramatic Roles of Women in Richard III

    1428 Words  | 3 Pages

    of his true intentions and that he does not plan to 'keep her long' we

    Read More

  • A Hero, a King, and a Daemon

    1163 Words  | 3 Pages

    Gifted with the darkest attributes intertwined in his imperfect characteristics, Shakespeare’s Richard III displays his anti-hero traits afflicted with thorns of villains: “Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous / By drunken prophecies, libels, and dreams” (I.i.32-33). Richard possesses the idealism and ambition of a heroic figure that is destined to great achievements and power; however, as one who believes that “the end justifies the means”, Richard rejects moral value and tradition as he is willing to do anything to accomplish his goal to the crown. The society, even his family and closest friends, repudiate him as a deformed outcast. Nevertheless, he cheers for himself as the champion and irredeemable villain by turning entirely to revenge of taking self-served power. By distinguishing virtue ethics to take revenge on the human society that alienates him and centering his life on self-advancement towards kingship, Richard is the literary archetype of an anti-hero.

    Read More

  • Providentialism In King Richard III

    708 Words  | 2 Pages

    The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.

    Read More

  • The Evil of Richard the Third

    956 Words  | 2 Pages

    "therefore, since I can not prove a lover, To entertain these fair well spoken days, I am determined to be a villain".As a villain Richard must be heartless, he can not let his emotions interfere with his actions.

    Read More

  • Comparison of King Richard III and Looking for Richard

    1514 Words  | 4 Pages

    Shakespeare constructs King Richard III to perform his contextual agenda, or to perpetrate political propaganda in the light of a historical power struggle, mirroring the political concerns of his era through his adaptation and selection of source material. Shakespeare’s influences include Thomas More’s The History of King Richard the Third, both constructing a certain historical perspective of the play. The negative perspective of Richard III’s character is a perpetuation of established Tudor history, where Vergil constructed a history intermixed with Tudor history, and More’s connection to John Morton affected the villainous image of the tyrannous king. This negative image is accentuated through the antithesis of Richards treachery in juxtaposition of Richmond’s devotion, exemplified in the parallelism of ‘God and Saint George! Richmond and victory.’ The need to legitimize Elizabeth’s reign influenced Shakespeare’s portra...

    Read More

  • Richard III Use Of Blood Essay

    1142 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Richard III, by William Shakespeare, there are many references and depictions of blood. Anne, Richard, and Richmond all make numerous speeches that involve this sanguine image. By using the various speeches and related fates of the characters in this work as a vehicle, Shakespeare calls upon the motif of blood throughout Richard III in order to demonstrate the futility of revenge.

    Read More

  • Shakespeare on Machiavelli: The Prince in Richard III

    1505 Words  | 4 Pages

    From the outset of the play, it is obvious that Richard subscribes to the majority of the Machiavellian principles.  Certainly, he is not ashamed or afraid to plot heinous murder, and he does so with an ever-present false front.  "I do mistake my person all this while,"1 he muses, plotting Anne's death minutes after having won her hand.  He will not even entertain the ideas in public, demanding they "Dive...down to [his] soul."2 He knows that he must be cunning and soulless to succeed in his tasks.  Richard also knows it is essential to guard against the hatred of the populace, as Machiavelli warned.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Behavior of Characters in Richard III

    1395 Words  | 3 Pages

    Richard had weakened since he had become king and was no longer ruthless as he had no reason to be ruthless. He had got what he wanted and was pleased with himself. He thought he was invincible, and he was too confident, which cost him his life. If he had been more careful, he would have been aware of the danger that lied before him. But, he did use some similar techniques in both the scenes.

    Read More

  • Richard II Essay: The Characters of Bolingbroke and Richard II

    860 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is a prime example of Richard using his authority by way of rulings and pronouncements rather than action, even to the point of disallowing an action. Bolingbroke, on the other hand, is quite ready to do battle no matter what the consequences. Moments before Richard puts a stop to the proceedings, Bolingbroke says, ". . . let no noble eye profane a tear / For me, if I be gorged with Mowbray's spear" (1.3.58-59). Here is a man who is resolved in his intent.

    Read More

More about Richard III Essay

Open Document