Rhetorical Analysis: The National Organization For Women

1248 Words3 Pages

Ngoc Bao Do (Chloe)
Instructor: Nicholas Sheffield
UCCP1102.533
February 10th, 2016
Rhetorical Analysis
Primary Source: “The National Organization for Women – 1966”
The National Organization for Women’s 1966 Statement of Purpose was written by Betty Friedan, whose published book “The Feminist Mystique” in 1963 have made a big impact on American women at that time. This source is effective in using the rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, and logos to convince the public to take action to help women can be treated more equally and can take part in any aspects of society, especially their privileges and responsibilities should be fair and equal in compare with men.
The author, Betty Friedan, was born on February 4th, 1921 in Peoria, …show more content…

The emotional appeals that she makes in the source is her effort to look for the happiness for the women, she has the steely voice in fighting for equality for women, to show her true enthusiasm. The most remarkable examples can be taken from the piece is the phrases “We believe”, “We reject”, “We do not accept” she uses in her paper. They can totally show her intense, her strength, and her enthusiasm. Some of them can be taken out here such as: “We believe that women can achieve such equality only by accepting to the full the challenges and responsibilities they share with all other people in our society, as part of the decision-making mainstream of American political, economic and social life”, “We believe that this nation has a capacity at least as great as other nations, to innovate new social institutions which will enable women to enjoy the true equality of opportunity and responsibility in society, without conflict with their responsibilities as mothers and homemakers”, “We do not accept the traditional assumption that a woman has to choose between marriage and motherhood, on the one hand, and serious participation in industry or the professions on the other”, “Above all, we reject the assumption that these problems are the unique responsibility of each individual woman, rather than a basic social dilemma which society must solve”, “We believe that a true partnership between the sexes demands a different concept of marriage, an equitable sharing of the responsibilities of home and children and of the economic burdens of their support”, and “We believe that proper recognition should be given to the economic and social value of homemaking and

Open Document