Rhetorical Analysis Of 'The Ballot Or The Bullet'

652 Words2 Pages

Malcolm X, His name is definitely a jab to the racists "X" standing for the rejection of slave names and for his unknown name of his African ancestors. In the speech he wrote "The Ballot or the Bullet", Malcolm X talks about the actions of the white man, about the wrongs he has done, he approached the civil rights issue in a very opposite way compared to the ways of other leaders (civil rights related) , such as Martin Luther King Jr. Instead of trying to intertwine the black and the whites, he mainly focuses on the separation of the two races. Malcolm X believed that the blacks should break away from the white man in cultural, economic, and political ways. He used tactics that connected to his audience emotionally, attacking the ways blacks …show more content…

Even though the blacks are called "citizens" of the United States, Malcolm X stated "Everything that came out of Europe, every blue-eyed thing, is already an American. As long as you and I have been over here, we aren't Americans yet." Malcolm X repetitively goes back to this idea, this thought, for the remaining of the speech, talking about how blacks are not Americans, but more like, they are Africans. He starts his sentence with "Everything that came out of Europe," making this idea that practically everyone from Europe was accepted in the American society, this includes the criminals, while all of the blacks, including those that were very educated like MLK Jr. frowned upon in society this idea fuels the hatred of his black audience. He often referred the white man as a "blue-eyed thing." By doing this, he just embraces the fact that the United States was completely built on something based on eye and skin color, which gives this feeling of pride to his black audience, because of the fact they, have the morals, morals a white man could never have, to look past differences, this starts to create this feeling of separation from the white

Open Document