Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare religion and science
Science v religion
Science v religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare religion and science
Have you ever questioned scientists religious beliefs? A young girl asked, and got a vague answer. Phyllis Wright, a sixth grade girl, wrote to Albert Einstein, asking him if scientists pray, and if they did, what they would pray for. When reading Einstein’s response, you get a very unclear answer to this question most people think about. The speaker of this letter is Albert Einstein; a man who is widely considered the greatest scientist of the twentieth century. The attended audience at the beginning was just Wright, and maybe some of her peers. Today, the intended audience is anyone who is interested on this topic along with high school students. Einstein uses multiple literary devices throughout his letter, including ethos, logos, and pathos, to answer the young girl's question about praying. First off, given that Einstein is a very well known scientist, …show more content…
Instead he states, “a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer,” which could be taken as saying no, scientists do not pray. The reason behind this logic is “scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature,” Einstein uses logos the most frequently in his letter. He appeals to logos a second time as he addresses the counterargument, he says “however, it must be admitted that our actual knowledge of these laws is only imperfect and fragmentary,” which portrays a humble attitude towards his audience. He follows that by saying “But, on the other hand, everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe -- a spirit vastly superior to that of man” By saying this, it portrays that he is open-minded, and is not saying that spirits do not exist, but explains that the view of someone in the scientific field views said
Whether we like to think about it or not, slavery has been a part of our country’s history and eradicating it was a struggle. Benjamin Banneker, the son of former slaves, writes to Thomas Jefferson to convict the institution of slavery in the United States. Banneker’s letter exhibits his negative feelings on the issue of slavery in which he provided many emotional and religious appeals, allusions and a critical tone to argue against slavery.
Science and faith are generally viewed as two topics that do not intermingle. However, Andy Crouch’s work, Delight in Creation, suggests that there is an approach to both faith and science that allows support of scientists in the church community. There is an approach that can regard science as a career that can reflect the nature of God.
Are humans cold-blooded killers? Biologist Rachel Carson states we “resort to ‘eradicating’ any creature that may annoy or inconvenience us.” However, her book is made much more than a provocative statement through her thoughtful reasoning and factual evidence. She focuses her argument against the use of deadly poisons, like parathion, which she says are “universal killers,” crying moral injustice throughout.
In 1695 Galileo wrote a Letter to The Grand Duchess Christina. This letter discussed the relationship between the traditional biblical beliefs of the time (the basis on which their society was built), scientific discoveries, and their correlation with one another. The purpose of the letter was to inform that the scientific discoveries being made were not hearsay or contradictory to the Bible, rather they were natural laws, which could coincide with Scriptural based beliefs, not oppose them. In the Letter to The Grand Duchess Christina, Galileo implies that science is the means by which G-d meant for humanity to understand scriptural truths. This belief can be applied to the present day by finding equilibrium, and in turn allowing for a balanced life.
Success. Seven letters, two syllables, and essentially, the goal of almost every person to walk the planet. The interesting thing about success is that it isn’t a set in stone goal, but an ideology. With each person, success is redefined, argued, and tried. Success comes in different forms and levels, but at the end of the day every person who has been deemed successful mentions one word: failure. Yet, it isn’t failure in of itself that produces success, but the determination and desire to work through it. Failure can only indoctrinate when an individual decides to work past it and improve from it. Often, however, the strenuous process of failure and grit is glamorized, and the true factors that play into success are forgotten. For example,
The author of Silent Spring, Rachel Carson, was a zoologist and marine biologist and had a successful civil service career at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. While pursuing a writing career, she became interested in marine biology, changed her major, and eventually completed a master’s degree in zoology from Johns Hopkins University in 1932 (Lear, 1998). Carson’s interest in writing and biology lander her a prominent position and later inspired her future writing ambitions. During her 15 year civil service career, Carson became Editor-in-Chief of all publications for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Lear, 1998). Carson used her scientific knowledge as a biologist, her work experience, and her literary skill to expose the problems and
As the Spanish Armada inched its way toward England, Queen ElizabethⅠdelivered a rousing speech to her troops that exhibited superior performance and intellect amongst women during the 16th century. In her speech, she gave her people hope and a sense of relief before the invasion took place. She gave them the encouragement they needed to feel as if she was a reliable backbone for the country; I am one of you, I will live and die with you. Throughout her speech, she rejected any opposition to her position and eliminated any worries about her capabilities as a woman. Queen Elizabeth used words and phrases in her speech that directed her words toward her audience hence, delivering a biased, yet passionate, emotional, and ambitious tone. The purpose of the speech was to give the people of England aspiration to win the invasion and the strength to cooperate with Queen Elizabeth to successfully execute victory against the enemy. It is through her diction and sentence structure that she gained the
In the essay ¨Silent Spring¨, Rachel Carson, a noted biologist address the argument of those who poison the environment, shouldn't hurt the others. Using diction and strong word choice throughout the text, Carson develop connections and explain the reason individual's position towards the environment. Carson appeals to American to help transform their attitudes towards the environment. Carson speaks in mixed tones of objectivity and anger.
Imagine living with an incurable, harmful disease for the rest of your life, feeling scared and embarrassed to even talk about your situation or getting to know new people. One who will never get to experience certain things again or at all for the rest of their life. Well, Mary Fisher a mother of two young children who had worked in Gerald Ford’s White House, addressed the delegates as someone who was H.I.V. positive herself. On August 19, 1992 Fisher spoke out to an enthusiastic crowd at the Republican National Convention in Houston, Texas to inform people about AIDS and her beliefs. In her speech she talked about three major topics. One of the topics she expressed was the way people felt about being infected with AIDS.
Anna’s questioning explores the tension between this theological worldview and the nascent emergence of science. Her view that time is wasted on religious speculations instead of rationality, extends beyond questioning the validity of faith to encapsulate a bold act of nonconformity. Through these emancipatory threads of the narrative we are provided a glimpse into a modern, independent character that affirms humanity’s capacity of
In, “The Speech of Miss Polly Baker” written by Benjamin Franklin (one of the Founding Fathers) in 1747, brought up the disparities that were between men and women within the judicial system. Also, “The Speech of Miss Polly Baker” also briefly points out, how religion has been intertwined with politics. All throughout “The Speech of Miss Polly Baker,” Benjamin Franklin uses very intense diction and syntax to help support what he is trying to express to the rest of society. Also writing this speech in the view point of a women, greatly helps establish what he is trying to say. If Benjamin Franklin was to write it as a man, the speech my have not had the same passionate effect as it currently has.
Writing in centuries past, many scientists felt compelled to wax poetic about cosmic mysteries and God's handiwork. Perhaps one should not be surprised at this: most scientists back then, as well as many scientists today, identify themselves as spiritually devout.
Scientific and religious approaches to comprehending reality are deeply complementary. I do not use the word ‘deeply’ for emphasis alone: the qualities that science and religion hold in common are anything but obvious. Viewed on the surface, science and religion often appear to be at odds. Details and dogmas frequently conflict, and misperceptions originating on either side can lead to rejection of the unfamiliar system. At the lofty level of philosophical abstraction, a satisfying reconciliation of science and religion will likely always remain elusive. At the level of personal experience, however, incorporating scientific and religious modes of understanding is not only possible, it is profoundly enriching. The impulses, methods, and themes that define both science and religion are strikingly similar. Curiosity and an insatiable desire to make sense of the world are qualities that are innate to human life; unsurprisingly, these impulses are the driving force behind both scientific and religious explorations. The means that facilitate such explorations are fundamentally alike as well: both science and religion are system-driven, with an emphasis on unflagging action in the pursuit of greater understanding. Finally, both scientific and religious modes of understanding inexorably return to a common set of recurrent themes, emphasizing the creativity, dynamism, and unity of the world we perceive.
Written by a renowned physicist, Albert Einstein, both passages were written for anybody who was interested in physics and economic ideologies. In the time when science and technology were rapidly developing, people sought for new information about physics and economy as they had to catch up with rapidly developing world. With developing technology, people, the audience of the passages A and B, had more access to media--which made Einstein’s high reputation as a physicist possible. Using different rhetorical approaches, such as qualifying language, grammatical tenses, and point of view, Einstein wrote passage A to explain the concept of physics--specifically, the relationship between time and space--while
To allege the occurrence of order in creation, purpose in its constituent parts and in its constituted whole, regularity in the meter of its rhythm and syncopations, and mindful structure in the design and construction of Nature is by far the most widely used and generally accepted ground for launching from the world belief in an intelligent and omnipotent designer god. One does not have to read for very long to find some modern intellectual involved in the analysis of some part of Nature come to the "Aha!" that there's a power at work imposing order, design, structure and purpose in creation. Modern religious piety salivates at the prospect of converting scientists and will take them any way it can. From Plato to Planck the problematic lion of religion must be rendered safe and tame. Religion must be reasonable, after all, we are reasonable "men." Einstein writes that the scientist's "religious feeling takes the form of rapturous amazement at the harmony of natural law, which reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection."