Rhetorical Analysis Of Jfk Inaugural Address

513 Words2 Pages

JFK’s Logic Much of John F. Kennedy’s speech addresses not only the citizens of America, but the whole world. He quickly confronts the concerns individuals may have with the course of the nation when he mentions that “the world is very different now” (Kennedy, 1961, par. 2). The Cold War caused a schism in world communication and cooperation. He reinforces the fact that “the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans” and that it is this new generation’s duty to commit to human rights at home and around the world (Kennedy, 1961, par. 3). It appeals to everyone’s basic humanity to help those who do not have the same opportunities that many Americans have. He frames it in the way, “We have the ability to help so why don’t we?” kind …show more content…

Although Kennedy did not have the influence or authority to completely inspire another nation, anyone could understand the need to compromise in the arms race like that in the Cuban Missile Crisis, shown in figure 1 [To the left]. He submits a request “that all sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction” (Kennedy, 1961, para. 10). It is a fate that neither side wants. To Kennedy it is only logical to pursue peace According to Benson (2015) in Genesis of the among-American alliance “… The John F. Kennedy administration was inaugurated with President Eisenhower’s warning in mind…” (Benson, 2015, p.1). Kennedy administration was committed to preventing Laos from falling to communism as to continue the way of Eisenhower but was called to decompress when not in direct confrontation. Kennedy continues his speech by commenting on the “overburdening” cost of modern weapons and that both sides are rightly alarmed “by the steady spread of the deadly atom” (Kennedy, 1961, par. 12). Even though many supported Kennedy’s views on peace, politics always managed to intervene mentioning that “a ‘peaceful solution’ to the crisis, however, required an end to soviet and north Vietnamese intervention” (Benson, 2015,

Open Document