Rhetorical Analysis Of Could The Trappist-1

699 Words2 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis of “Could the TRAPPIST-1 worlds harbor alien life?”
There is a cultural assumption that there are many alien civilizations in the universe. However, what do we really know about extraterrestrial life? With recent findings of water on Mars and the discovery of Trappist-1, there could be hope for extraterrestrial life out in the universe. Even though the water on Mars is frozen under the polar ice caps and Trappist-1 could be far from finding any alien life, there are still many articles supporting the research and looking forward to finding additional news. In the article “Could the TRAPPSIT-1 worlds harbor alien life?’ written by Liz Fuller-Wright, she reports the announcement of astronomers that they found a miniature solar system of seven Earth-sized planets. Furthermore, the argument is effective towards bright individuals because it makes one think about what it will be if there was actually life outside of Earth.
Liz Fuller-Wright works on The Christian Science Monitor’s online editorial team, where she edits news stories from the Rapid Response Team. Some of the background that provides credibility to the research of extraterrestrial life is that she has worked as a Mars volcanologist, is a science writer, journalist, researcher, and has degrees in …show more content…

To illustrate, the effectiveness of the article, she ends with adding that perhaps there is life on these planets. The author ends the article using a rhetorical appeal of pathos to appeal the audience that believes in extraterrestrial life. The author tries to use professional effective rhetorical elements to persuade the audience into reading the article and becoming interested in the news. Even so, the argument is effective towards bright individuals because it makes one think about what it will be if there was actually life outside of

Open Document