Rhetorical Analysis Of 'A Genetic Of Justice' By Julia Alvarez

In the articles “A Genetic of Justice” by Julia Alvarez, “The text of Malala Yousafzai’s speech at the United Nations” and “On the Adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human” they talk about freedom and their human rights. The interesting thing about these articles is that they all fight for freedom. For instance, they are fighting for what they believe in. Also, these people were caring towards others because not only were they fighting for their rights, but others as well. In these articles, it displays the same rhetorical devices of diction and rhetorical device. Given these points these representatives like Minerva, Malala, and Eleanor are brave for standing up for themselves and others because it takes a lot of courage to speak up

During this process a lot happened. For example, many wanted to assassinate her for disobeying them and going against their rules. The thing was Malala didn’t care because she knew in her heart that she was doing the right thing when speaking. In the article it states, “ there are hundreds of Human Rights activist and social workers who are not only speaking for human rights, but who are struggling to achieve their goals of Education, peace and equality. Thousands of people have been killed by terrorists and millions have been injured. I am just one of them.” (Paragraph 3) She was a brave little girl for speaking up because not many had the guts to do what she did. Also, malala knew she was putting her life at risk ,but she still did what she did because now it’s not only about her, but others as

For example, she talks about how blacks aren't allowed to go to certain places. The reason being is the white's discriminate the black people for the fact that the color is different. The white people use this as an excuse to limit the black people's freedom. In the article it states, “certain provisions of the Declaration are stated in such broad terms as to be acceptable only because the provisions and article 30 providing for limitation on the exercise of the rights for the purpose of meeting the requirement of morality, public order, and the general welfare.” This means that everyone has the right to equal access to the public service in this country. On the other hand, it clearly states that everyone has their rights, but in reality the white community is limiting the black people's rights. Which I believe isn't fair because either everyone gets their rights or no one gets their