Responsibility In Truman Capote's In Cold Blood

667 Words2 Pages

Every mind, every thought, everyone revolves around ideas. Many may have a deeper and more complex idea while others vaguely neglect it. Each decision being made has a cause to its effect. In the novel In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, demonstrates the idea of consequences in one’s responsibility, however only under certain circumstances. Similarly, in Sophie’s World by Jostein Gaarder, Spinoza explicates when we live freely, we develop our natural abilities however one must accept the consequences of such abilities accordingly.
Spinoza was an excommunicated Jew. He viewed aspects from the “perspective of eternity”. He states that we must be free. Additionally, humans will achieve free will because we are constrained by our desires. This philosophy …show more content…

The inhuman and motiveless evil race upon Holcomb, destroys the peace of a small town. However, those surrounding differ their thoughts after the realizations of Dick and Perry's medical issues, "he [Perry] was under a mental eclipse, deep inside a schizophrenic [ring of] darkness” (Capote.302). Furthermore, based on medical analysis, their actions weren't in their control since they were unable to control their responses. Their past illustrates them as who they has transformed into. Perry dealt with a dysfunctional family. The troubled past Perry experienced extends out towards the rest of his life evidenced by his criminal records. On the contrary, Dick had a better childhood as compared to Perry. However, his matter of fact exudes his arrogance and malicious cruelty. Their label evolves from heartless and cold-blooded to pitiful as the truth of the crime boils down. As they have “overly sensitive to criticism” (Capote.297) ideas, they mutually struggle desperately for recognition. Their frenzied ideas prior to the murder reflects the effect of consequences. Even prior to the murder, Perry compensated for his actions, Perry wouldn’t have crippled his legs if he chose a car over a motorcycle. He could've worked properly if he didn't crippled himself. If he had a good income, it wouldn't be necessary for him to steal. He wouldn't be in jail if he didn't steal. Consequently, being in jail mirrors

Open Document