Response Essay 'Shooting An Elephant'

776 Words2 Pages

Summary/Response Essay – “Shooting an Elephant” In the essay titled, “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, he explains the culture of where he worked in Burma. He explains “a small incident” that he had to confront, while he was a police officer in Burma. A small crowd wants an elephant, who escaped from its cage, dead. They want to stop the elephant’s treacherous deeds. These include: the elephant killed a man, killed a cow, and it destroyed someone’s hut. Orwell goes out with a gun in search of the elephant, but doesn’t intend to shoot the elephant. When he goes out in search for the elephant, who has supposedly gone crazy, a crowd of many people follow him. The crowd wants him to shoot the elephant. In this essay, Orwell was challenged …show more content…

The author’s main point was when Orwell was faced with a conflict of whether he should shoot the elephant. He could have chosen to shoot the elephant and please the crowd or he could have chosen not to shoot the elephant, despite the crowd’s jeering effects. I don’t agree that the Orwell should have shot the elephant, because the elephant didn’t know all that he was doing was wrong, because he is an animal, who has no free will. The only reason Orwell shot it was so he didn’t look a fool. He quotes at the end of the essay after he shot the elephant, “And afterwards I often wondered whether anyone understood that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool” …show more content…

Second, one the weaknesses of the text I chose entail that this essay is longer than most essays, which makes it a little more difficult to make a shorter summary, but if I only include the essential parts of the essay, it will make the summary with more quality. The author includes logos, pathos and ethos. First, he includes logos (logic). He put it in the essay when Orwell shoots the elephant. He shoots the elephant when he was asked to do it, since it was his job. Second, Orwell adds pathos (emotion), when he shoots the elephant. Orwell shoots the elephant five times, which includes a lot of emotion, because the elephant dies, slowly and painfully. It didn’t die even after three shots right through its body. Third, Orwell incorporates ethos (credibility). In the essay, Orwell explains an incident of his own, while he was a Burmese police officer. Orwell didn’t shoot the elephant once, not even twice, … but five times, right through the elephant’s guts, which is not surprising to me that he had to shoot it so many times, because Orwell declared, “I took my rile, an old 44 Winchester and much too small to kill an elephant, but I though the noise might scare him”

Open Document