Research Paper On Martin Luther King Speech

821 Words2 Pages

Was Martin Luther King Jr. really as great a speaker as he is remembered as? His speeches did move people, but which people?
Seldom did Dr. King ever adress white people while giving a speech since his usual purpose was to rile the Negroes into fighting their oppressors. The common traits associated with his speeches such as the rhythm and call and answer format were used due to his familiarity with them due to his Baptist background. His realizing that religion lies at the heart of Negro tradition allowed him to cater to their familiarities while ignoring the white traditions he was not raised with. His lack of respect for the white man goes so deep that Dr. King disqualifies their traditions for his own movement. If Dr. King were to broaden …show more content…

In just the first half of the speech, Dr. King was already mentioning that “the glory of the lord shall be revealed” once people of all color come together (2). Martin Luther King has hardly gotten into why the Negroes should have equal rights and is already bringing the Lord onto his side. While he can count on this having a lasting effect on the black Baptist community, the same assumption cannot be made pertaining to the white population. Keeping in mind that the audience he must now sway are traditional americans, the only common trait amongst them that can be safely assumed is their patriotism. He makes a desperate attempt to incorporate ideals of patriotism such as freedom in his final statement Free at last! Free at Last! Thank God Almighty we are free at last! …show more content…

King would also have to take out his slandering traditional white culture if he truly wanted his point to be taken into consideration. A good majority of the speech consisted of Dr. King negatively connoting the white culture through strong use of adjectives. He described the people living in Alabama as “vicious racists” and Mississippi “a state sweltering with the heat of injustice” since those are the states inhabited by traditional Americans (3). Describing these states this way is a direct attack on the white way of life which would have to be eliminated if he wanted whites to value his speech. Not only does he negatively connote the white way of life, he blatantly threatens them by saying “ those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual” and that “there will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights”(2). By basically stating that there will not be peace until Negros get rights, therefore threatening the white way of life. Outright threatening the audience would make them not even listen to one’s argument, even if it were supported by

Open Document