Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of television violence introduction
Violence on television
The effects of television violence introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of television violence introduction
As time has been going on violence has been a form of entertainment. Over time we as people have evolved and the form of entertainment has too. Television has become one of the most popular forms of entertainment. When you mix up some violence into television there is always an audience that will watch. To keep this audience watching you must add storylines and characters. The male soap opera of professional wrestling is born.
Professional wrestling is the form of entertain and sports mixed together to get sport-entertainment. Just like any other form of entertainment there needs to be a cast and story. The wrestlers are the cast and take they take the violent bumps and bruises. The stories they tell is the entertainment side of professional wrestling. In the world of professional wrestling anything is legal. The more the violent the more the crowd erupts. Slam a man on the mat not much a reaction. Put that man threw a table louder reaction. Thru that man off the top of 20 foot cage the crowd goes wild. The more violent the fans love it even more.
Violence, profanity, gratuity, and sex sells in our civilization. Professional wrestling capitalized on all those in its heyday. Those larger than life figures were characters an audience watch and wanted to be. They were told to eat there vitamins and say their prayers. They saw these professionals jump of ladders onto tables, and they tried to emulate what they had sawn. This same industry had an audience yelling “suck it.” This is the industry with so much influence. This same audience has had moments when they tried wrestling maneuvers and killed their “opponent”, most of the time the opponents were family or friends. In this study do viewers who watch pro wrestling have differen...
... middle of paper ...
...football. It is one of the most violent sports out there. The reason people watch it is because they enjoy seeing the violence caused to another human being. It gives the viewers a feeling of being in the violence but without any of the side effects of being attacked.
Television isn’t always kind to violent programs. Professional wrestling isn’t the most scholarly program far from it. It won’t be winning awards from parents. A study “The Raw Nature of Televised Professional Wrestling: Is the Violence a Cause for Concern?” it gave more insight into the nature of televised professional wrestling. The study took a sample of programs of theirs. “It was a procedure to establish a very precise time code for use in unitizing the acts to be coded in this study. Given the uncommon frequency and speed with which violent acts begin and end in TV wrestling…” (Tamborini, 2005)
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
Violent scenes and scenarios are now a common go-to for movies, books, comics, and much more.
Kaplan, R.M. & Singer, R.D. (1976). TV violence and viewer aggression: A reexamination of the evidence. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 33-70.
Everyone’s seen the classic cartoons. Wile E. Coyote chasing the Roadrunner around a bend, only the Roadrunner turns, but our comedic--and usually stupid--villain doesn’t. So, he falls from a height of what looks like about 500,000 feet, only to become a small puff of smoke at the bottom of the canyon. After all, if what happens to you when you fall from that height were to have happened to Mr. Coyote, that would have been a very short lived cartoon series. Maybe this example is an exaggeration, but the idea is the same: violence comes streaming into our homes every single day through our TVs not to be viewed, but to be devoured. It’s been proven that sex and violence sell. For those of us who can tell the difference between reality and fantasy, the effect of TV violence is miniscule. But for our children--who think when the Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers come to the local shopping mall, that it’s the biggest event since Bert told Ernie he snores too loud--the violence seen on TV seems like a logical reaction to life’s problems. And that’s a problem within itself. The impact of televised violence on children is only a slice of the pie that is the problem with the endless stream of violent acts on TV.
society portrays them to be. The wrestlers and their actions are widely exaggerated and people
Coakley, J. J., & Donnelly, P. (2007). Violence in Sports . Sports in society: issues & controversies (9th ed., pp. 198-199). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
McMahon, R. (November 2006). Parents, coaches who need time-outs. Adult violence at kids' sports sets a terrible example. Retrieved February 2011 from SFGate.com Website: www.sfgate.com.
Television with its far reaching influence spreads across the globe. Its most important role is that of reporting the news and maintaining communication between people around the world. Television's most influential, yet most serious aspect is its shows for entertainment. Violent children's shows like Mighty Morphing Power Rangers and adult shows like NYPD Blue and Homicide almost always fail to show human beings being able to resolve their differences in a non-violent manner; instead they show a reckless attitude that promotes violent action first with reflection on the consequences later. Contemporary television creates a seemingly insatiable appetite for amusement of all kinds without regard for social or moral benefits (Schultze 41). Findings over the past twenty years by three Surgeon Generals, the Attorney General's Task Force on Family Violence, the American Medical Association, the National Institute of Mental Health, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and other medical authorities indicate that televised violence is harmful to all of us, but particularly to the mental health of children (Medved 70-71).
Wrestling is more than just a sport; it is a way of life. And for those who enjoy its opportunities, it is something that takes the mind off of all of life’s troubling times, and puts one man against another to get their hand raised. Competition makes everything evolve, and there is no other sport that epitomizes what competition truly is. Wrestling spans the entire globe, and although it incorporates several different styles and many National and World events, remains overlooked by most.
According to the epigraph of the article, Modern Gladiators: A Content Analysis of Televised Wrestling, “The purpose of this study is to explore how antisocial content in televised wrestling is represented in match–nonmatch time and in three different television time periods: prime time, after midnight, and weekend morning time.” (Woo, 2003) This study was conducted to find out whether or not children might be exposed to similar amounts of antisocial behaviors regardless of time period. (Woo, 2003) The article defines antisocial behaviors as, “aggressive acts, rule violations, and glamorization of violence.” The article considers these behaviors very important in the evaluation and analyzing portion of the research conducted for this study. “This study delves into the antisocial content represented in televised wrestling programs to examine the possibility that these may affect children and adolescents.” (Woo, 2003)
...ent behavior in order to win the game. Whereas, “sports violence can be seen as either an example of laudable competitive drive present in worthy participates or an underhanded attempts at rule bending” (Raney & Depalma, 2006). Moreover, decades of media exposure may have led to an increase in the acceptance of violence. Is media coverage exploiting sports violence and aggression for ratings? It’s unclear if fans are becoming desensitized and/or imitating the violence witnessed through the medium of media. Regardless, it’s abundantly clear the changes need to be made in light of the negative effects. Identifying and examining media’s role in the public’s acceptance of aggressive behavior in sports may aid society in minimizing the violence and aggression as much as possible surrounding sporting events to make sporting events safer for both players and fans.
How do you market violence? Can the general public be persuaded to look at unarmed combat as a legitimate sport? Through the course of the paper, I will discuss all the aspects of the marketing mix, and how they are utilized by the mixed martial arts promotion The Ultimate Fighting Championship. I will also discuss the effect of their current marketing stratagem, and the impact to their booming business.
One question that viewers ask is, “Is Reality Television really real?” One can think so, but in the long run, it is really not. A great example of discovering this is World Wrestling Entertainment, also known as the WWE. From...
Summary #1 Television violence, and media violence in general, has been a controversial topic for several years. The argument is whether young children are brainwashed into committing violent real-world crimes because of violent and pugnacious behavior exposed in mass media. In his article “No Real Evidence for TV Violence Causing Real Violence”, Jonathan Freedman, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto and author of “Media Violence and Its Effect on Aggression: Assessing the Scientific Evidence”, discusses how television violence, claimed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), does not cause real-world aggression among adolescents. The FCC determined to restrict violent television programming to late night hours only because their “scientific research” proves of increasing aggression among young viewers (Freedman Par. 2).
There are many theories to why there is so much violence in sports today and one of them is because the athletes today are able to get away with more when they are young. An example would be if a high profile high school athlete who had a scholarship to a big time school were to get in trouble maybe it would be hidden a lot more. Where as if another non-athlete had done the same thing there would be more of a price to pay. So from an early age these athletes learn that they are more important then other students or people. When they get to the college or pro level and someone tells them what to do they don't know how to handle it in the correct manor. Many professional athletes have been looked upon as a problem before they become pro because of certain violence problems they have had in the past. And in many cases it has hurt player in where they are drafted and the money that they make.