Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Vincent van Gogh and his
Gene vincent van gogh
Vincent van Gogh and his
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Vincent van Gogh and his
Self portrait is one of the form of art that artist would draw themselves in a creative perspective. In our today’s society, self portrait can be created in various medium. The most common and easiest one is photograph. However before the photograph was invented, paintings were the medium in which people would portray and draw themselves. Famous self portrait artists such as the Dutch artists Rembrandt and Vincent van Gogh. These two artists spent most of their time working on painting themselves. However, these two Dutch painters have different artistic style and meaning when it comes to self portrait. Rembrandt was born on July 15, 1606 in Leiden, Netherland. Rembrandt did not grew up from a family artist; his father was a miller, and his …show more content…
In Rembrandt’ self portrait, he is wearing a very fashionable clothes (Fig. 5). Same as the previous two self portraits; It has no background. In van Gogh’s self portrait, he is wearing a blue suit (Fig. 6). Also, he is standing at a different angle when comparing with his previous two self portraits. The most prominent features when comparing the three Rembrandt’s self portraits is the decline of his details. Wetering mentions on his book when Rembrandt was getting older, he started to lose his sharp blush strokes: “ Rembrandt uses the blush more loosely and fleetingly, and avoids sharpness in his contour and inner drawing” (172). If we compare the two of his self portraits (Fig. 1 and 5), then we can see in his earlier self portrait has some flawless details. However, when we see his other self portraits, it has some flaws especially on his face; the distortion on his eyelids and forehead. Furthermore, van Gogh has some progression with his blush strokes. For example, the previous self portraits (Fig. 4) has some rough, straight blush strokes, but the latest self portrait has wavy, curvy blushstrokes. This dramatically change of blush strokes is most likely when van Gogh’s mental health was starting to break down. As his health is getting worser, his wavy blush strokes get prominent …show more content…
Similarly from his previous two self portraits, Rembrandt’s self portrait is a closed composition and with no background. Nonetheless, van Gogh’s self portrait is open composition because of his background that portrays that he is a void of space. When it comes to color between these two self portraits, there are distinct features. In Rembrandt’s self portrait, there are high contrast colors as he would with his other self portraits. While van Gogh is about saturated colors as the self portraits portrays.
Finally, another distinction between the two self portraits are the visual elements. Rembrandt’s self portrait has no line except for his body outline, while van Gogh has various lines like his curvy lines all around the portrait. There is chiaroscuro in Rembrandt’s self portrait being applied around his body, while van Gogh does not have any chiaroscuro. Both of these artists, Rembrandt and Vincent van Gogh, did self portraits most of their lives. Although they are very distinct from each other based off composition and visual elements, they share a common goal. They drew self portraits because they felt it was their duty to paint themselves in a whole new perspective. Even though they had downfall of their lives, they left their legacy in which many people will cherish for many generations to
Vincent Van Gogh is one of the world’s greatest and most well-known artists, but when he was alive he considered himself to be a complete failure. It was not until after he died that Van Gogh’s paintings received the recognition they deserved. Today he is thought to be the second best Dutch artist, after Rembrandt. Born in 1853, he was one of the biggest artistic influences of the 19th century. Vincent Van Gogh created a new era of art, he learned to use art to escape his mental illness, and he still continues to inspire artists over 100 years later.
Coming from a family greatly involved in art dealing, Vincent van Gogh was destined to have a place in the world of art. Van Gogh’s unique techniques and use of color, which clashed and differed greatly from the masters of the art world of his time, would eventually gain him the recognition as one of the founders of modern art. Van Gogh’s early life was heavily influenced by the role of his father who was a pastor and chose to follow in his footsteps. Although he abandoned the desire to become a pastor, van Gogh remained a spiritual being and was strong in faith. Plagued with a troubled mind and poor health, van Gogh’s life became filled with torment and isolation that would influence his career in later life as an artist. In his late twenties, van Gogh had decided that it was God’s divine plan for him to become a painter. His works would express through thoughtful composition and vibrant color, the emotions that he was unable to manifest in the real world. Van Gogh’s perception of reality and his technique would face harsh criticism and never receive full acceptance from his peers as a serious artist during his brief career. In a collection of correspondence entitled The Letters of a Post-Impressionist, Vincent confirmed these thoughts while writing to his brother Theo, “It irritates me to hear people say that I have no "technique." It is just possible that there is no trace of it, because I hold myself aloof from all painters” (27). His technique would later be marveled and revered by the art world. Vincent van Gogh’s legacy would thrive as it challenged the way the world envisioned modern art through his unique brush strokes and profound use of color as seen in his works The Sower and The Night Café. A brief look into...
Each respective piece of art is no doubt a self portrait, but how each artist is represented in the two pieces is where the contrasting elements come into play. In Portrait
Rembrandt was an artist who was able to portray true human emotion and the connection it has with religion. He suffered a lot in his lifetime. He experienced death in
The historical painting I chose for my final, is an illustration of Bret Harte’s novel, Her Letter, His Response, and Her Last Letter, creatively illustrated by Arthur Ignatius Keller in 1905. The historical painting I chose for the comparison of Arthur Keller’s painting is another painting done by Arthur I Keller; illustrated for 54-40 or Fight by Emerson Hough, in 1909. Arthur I Keller is a very natural, elegant style painter, with an eye for natural beauty. Keller’s many paintings express intricate detail, and genuine quality. Although I picked two water color paintings out of Arthur Keller’s many collections of paintings, he also uses charcoal, acrylics, oils, and pastels to create other works of art. In both paintings I chose, Arthur Keller uses water color and gouache to paint people. Arthur’s first painting I mentioned, illustrating “Her Letter” is a more detailed painting. Keller uses water color to create a graceful look to his painting; his delicate balance of color, keeps the viewer’s eyes wandering around the painting. The focal point in the painting does not catch the viewer’s eyes because of heavy, dark colors, but because of the proportion differences of the people he implies. The painting gives off a very old fashioned feel, in a tasteful way. Arthur Keller’s second painting, illustrating “54-40 or Fight” has a completely different color theme, and gives off more of a mysterious, dark feel to it. The painting is detailed, but in a more simple way, and there is less negative space. As to where Keller’s “Her Letter” painting had a lot of open areas on the canvas, this painting, displays two people in a small enclosed dark room. The focal point is more dramatic, and a lot more obvious because instead of using sizing,...
(Portrait of a man, (self-portrait?)) In fact, the man in this portrait is unknown, no
A self portrait is normally a painting of the painter itself. The painting is a tangible piece of art because it is
Vincent van Gogh’s painting style changed drastically throughout his brief years as an artist. In 1885 he painted The Potato Eaters (Figure 1) which is dark with realistic looking peasant figures sitting around a table eating dinner. Prior to 1885 and during 1885 van Gogh did not have a large history of mental breakdown like he did post 1886. The Potato Eaters is one of his most famous paintings from before he began to have mental breakdowns. After he began to have breakdown, van Gogh’s paintings began to get more colorful. In 1887 he painted Self-Portrait, 1887 (Figure 2) which is a self-portrait of himself that is more imaginative and colorful than The Potato Eaters. By 1887 van Gogh had begun to show signs of mental issues, but he had not
In the grand scale of time, these two portraits technically were not painted very far apart. But in terms of art styles of each of said time periods, they are very different. Van Eyck’s paintings were created at the dawn of the early Renaissance, which drew upon ideas like science, humanism and philosophy. The art during that period preserved a medieval understanding of a hierarchical relationship as well as religious imagery but also while pleasing in a realistic treatment of elements that were both natural as well as man made. On the other hand, Rigaud was present during the Baroque cultural movement at the height of reformation. As a result of the time period, the art style for the Baroque was grand ...
...uring his later years; he painted almost no people in his work as he physically ripened. Both these artists’ lifestyles largely affected the aesthetic principals in their works. Degas depicts incredible detail on his subjects foreground and faces in particular while leaving the backgrounds of his works slightly hazing; therefore rendering them almost unimportant to his works. An example of this would be one of Degas earlier works: “Achille De Gas in the Uniform of A Cadet” c. 1855. However, Monet varied his work much more than Degas did. The evolution of Monet’s artistic style was extreme.
In history, there were two paintings that were very similar yet different. One was called the “Mona Lisa” which was painted by one of the most famous artists of the renaissance, Leonardo da Vinci. The other painting was called “Portrait of a Lady” by the flemish artist, Van der Weyden. They both were a huge influence in the art world during their lifetimes. And even after their deaths, their lives and works continue to inspire the minds and hearts of each generation.
Vincent Van Gogh never gave up his style and insight in his early work compared to his later work. I will discuss the comparison of the Potato Eaters and Starry Night and even though there are obvious differences, the core of his passion and eccentricities can be seen.
Jackson Pollack and Vincent van Gogh are some of most famous artist before and after their time. Each artist has a similar and different painting methods that they use when painting pictures. There most well-known paintings are called “Number 1” and “The Starry Night”. The paintings give off emotion by how they look, but each one is painted in different ways. The public did not find their paintings wanting when they were made. The difference was how long it took for them to get recognized for their work. Lastly, the paintings gave different and similar reactions to people that have changed over the years of their existence.
Through time due to advancements in material and painting techniques combined with the ever-increasing talent of the artists, paintings representing people have become very lifelike and are extremely realistic. Some painted portraits have as much detail as modern photographs. However, there are also paintings of people that are representational in which the artist is trying to convey a message. This paper discusses the two types through the comparison of two paintings, Abaporu and Portrait of a Lady.
1606 in Leiden, the Netherlands. He was the ninth of ten children. His father was a miller, and even though he came from a family of modest means, his parents took great pride in education. Rembrandt began his studies at the Latin school. At the age of fourteen, he enrolled at the University of Leiden. This did not interest him and he soon left to study art. He was fascinated by the work of many Italian artists. He began his studies with a local master, Jacob van Swanenburch. he then went to Amsterdam to study with Pieter Lastman. After six months, Rembrandt had mastered everything so he went back to Leiden. Even though he was only twenty-two, he was so highly respected that he took on his first students. He continued to teach throughout his entire life.