Reflection Paper On Psychology

701 Words2 Pages

Enrolling in this class, I believed I had a solid basic knowledge of psychology that would assist me throughout the semester, however, just reading the first page proved how wrong I was. My initial perception of psychology was similar to that of psychology before the 1900s, as the textbook states. I focused on the psychoanalysis of mind and soul, theories on consciousness and exactly what that entails, unaware that the definition of psychology had been altered long before I had begun to study Freud and his Id, Ego, and Superego. The fact that psychology has shifted so drastically to become a proper science surprised me, as I had always known it as a study of theories, but it also made more sense as I continued to read. Amongst intellectuals, evidence is king, and there is no possible way to gain evidence of a soul …show more content…

On the other hand, the human brain and its functions can be measured, through recorded observations and tasks with quantitative or qualitative properties. As a relatively new field of study, psychology has the task of proving itself worthy of recognition in the world of science. The textbook states in the second chapter that the side who makes a demonstrable claim has the burden of providing proof to back up said claim. In this situation, the side with the burden of truth is those that support psychology as a science. How can you prove that something is not a science? You would have to prove that there is nothing measurable or recordable about the human brain that could be recreated through experiments. Modern psychology, which focuses more on the effects of experiences and behaviors on health, is a much easier practice to measure than previous theoretical psychology

More about Reflection Paper On Psychology

Open Document