Reflection: Comparing Ethics And Conflict Resolution

1004 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Brief overview of alternative dispute resolution

Reflection
Assignment 6: Comparing Ethics Practices was selected as the e-portfolio artifact for CONR 638: Ethics and Conflict Resolution. The artifact was selected based on its overall content and thorough demonstration of the learning outcome specified for this course. The artifact begins with an assessment of the national codes, standards and guidelines for mediation and alternative dispute resolution practices. The codes and general standards discussed in the artifact were then applied to the mission and vison of Abilene Christian University and its conflict resolution department in the development of the ACU Peacemaker Ethics Policy (PEP). Furthermore, the artifact demonstrates a mastery of the learning outcome in its comprehensive …show more content…

Diverging from other standards of the Natural period, the Ten Commandments focused on man’s relationships with his fellow man as commanded by a higher power. Shortly after the revelation of Talmudic laws, Ionians, such as Thales, introduced explanations of natural phenomena utilizing rational theories, which he expanded to explicate the concepts of the soul and divinity. Ionian thought paved the way for the metaphysical period, which was aimed at explaining the fundamental nature of corporeal beings. Theories pertaining to the laws of nature are rooted in this period and continue to impact cultural and religious standards which suggest that morality manifests in correlation with natural laws that govern the actions of mankind (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2012, p. 12). Correspondingly, Sophist, advocated that virtue is could be taught; a line of thinking that opened the door for the likes of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle who fronted philosophical systems that significantly impacted Western philosophy and precepts of ethics and morality. As delineated in the artifact the Ethical period, was characterized by Stoicism and Skepticism, which promulgate knowledge and …show more content…

Lewis (2001) in Mere Christianity pertaining to the Laws of Human Nature. The natural law theory contends, “…that morality somehow is embodied in nature and that there are “natural laws” that human beings must adhere to if they are to be moral (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2012, p. 12). Lewis suggests, that “Something” which directs the all elements in the universe also guides, laws within mankind, urging good actions, and causing discomfort when engaged in immoral behavior. Lewis (2001) differentiates between the archetypal behavior observed in humans, and the behavior that humans ought to employ, stating “the moral law is about what we ought to do.” As evidenced by the timeline of ethical thought, and as presented in the artifact, concepts of morality and immorality change over time, in adherences to cultural standards, beliefs and political regimes. Immorality is ubiquitous, inescapable and reoccurring; and aspirations of good or decent behavior often parallel the occurrence perceived

Show More
Related

  • Morality In Martin Luther King's A Letter From Birmingham Jail

    1188 Words  | 3 Pages

    Morality derives from the Latin moralitas meaning, “manner, character, or proper behavior.” In light of this translation, the definition invites the question of what composes “proper behavior” and who defines morality through these behaviors, whether that be God, humanity, or an amalgamation of both. Socrates confronted the moral dilemma in his discourses millennia ago, Plato refined his concepts in his Republic, and leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi would commit their life work to defining and applying the term to political reform. Finally, after so many years, Martin Luther King’s “A Letter from Birmingham Jail” reaches a consensus on the definition of morality, one that weighs the concepts of justice and injustice to describe morality as the

    Read More

  • Reconciling a Perfect God with an Imperfect World

    1746 Words  | 4 Pages

    Most can agree that in, most circumstances, these actions are evil, so it can be concluded that there are certain things that a person simply ought not to do. This is the foundation of C.S. Lewis’ Moral Law argument for the existence of God. Lewis argues that every person has a sense of right and wrong moral behavior, and this sense presses upon us. This is what he calls the Law of Human nature, or Moral Law. However, unlike other laws like gravity, this law can be disobeyed. In fact, despite the fact that all people are aware of this law, they constantly disobey

    Read More

  • Reflection On Ethical Lens

    1155 Words  | 3 Pages

    n this reflective journal entry, we are going to look at that the ethical issues that were presented in the Ethics Game simulations, the decision-making steps that were completed to address ethically the issues, and the ethical lenses that I used to make decisions throughout the simulation. We are also going to take a look at how these different ethical lenses influenced my decision and the how I could use the concepts that I have learned in my workplace.

    Read More

  • John Corvino's Arguments For The Morality Of Homosexuality

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    Natural law theorists claim that actions are deemed right just because they are looked at as natural and something that is unnatural is immoral. However, there are different understandings of what is natural and what is not, which can make support for this theory hard. Examples such as homosexuality, give a strong argument against the natural law theory. We will look at the work of John Corvino as he explains the arguments for the immorality of homosexuality, but also the reasons why these arguments are not strong evidence. With these examples in mind, the fact that something is unnatural is not a good enough reason to claim something immoral.

    Read More

  • Normative Ethics Immanuel Kant

    1148 Words  | 3 Pages

    Normative ethics have received much praise and criticism from well-respected philosophers for many years. Structured by Immanuel Kant, arguably one of the greatest minds in history, Kantian ethics have changed the way people look at what truly makes an action “right.” Kant believed that developing a moral system that was consistent and based entirely on reason was achievable. He urged ethics that are knowable without reference to sense experience, or as he calls “a priori” claims, because they are universal and binding. Kant argued that it is impossible to ground ethics on religion. Instead, he turned to a vague sense of natural law and states that rules exist to rational beings, whether on this universe or any other, simply because they are rational beings.

    Read More

  • Restorative Justice Chapter 3 Summary

    1297 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bodine, J. Richard, K. Donna, and Crawford. The Handbook of Conflict Resolution Education: A Guide to Building Quality Programs in Schools. San Francisco: Jossey-bass, 1998. Print.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Lewis Idea Of The Law Of Human Nature

    1032 Words  | 3 Pages

    What are your thoughts about Lewis’s idea of the “Law of Human Nature”? What are some of the laws of right and wrong that seem to be built into mankind? I agree with Lewis’s idea of Human Nature because all humans act a certain way no matter what their background is. Rooted in all humans is a desire to do what is good and Lewis offers a well developed explanation for this phenomenon. Some laws of right and wrong can be do not murder, do not steal, and treat others with respect.

    Read More

  • Kant’s View on Abortion Explained by Categorical Imperative

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    Barry, Vincent, Olen, Jeffrey, & Van Camp, Julie C. Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings, Tenth Edition. Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011.

    Read More

  • The Law Of Nature In C. S. Lewis Mere Christianity

    5811 Words  | 12 Pages

    C.S. Lewis begins his book, “Mere Christianity”, by introducing the Law of Right and Wrong or the Laws of Nature. This, however, arises a question. What is the Law of Nature? The Law of Nature is the known difference between right and wrong. That is, mans distinction between what is right and what is wrong. “This law was called the Law of Nature because people thought that everyone knew it and did not need to be taught it”(18). Lewis relates the law to how we treat others. We treat others the way we want to be treated and if they treat us poorly in return we become agitated and annoyed with them. He states that we become a society of excuses when something goes wrong. He goes on to say that we want to behave in a certain way when in reality we do the opposite of what is right or what is wrong. We are humans and humans have primal instincts. We are all capable of using our instincts to do right or wrong. Lewis uses an example of a drowning man to prove this point. When one sees a man in trouble two desires or instincts kick into play, to save the man or ignore him because the situation at hand could endanger you. However, there in another impulse that says help the man. With this comes a conflict of instincts. Do you run and forget about it or do you jump in and help. Most people will help even if the situation is going to endanger their life. This is just one way of seeing moral law. The right in a situation will mostly always prevail over the wrong. “Men ought to be unselfish, ought to be fair. Not that men are selfish, nor that they like being unselfish, but they ought to be”(30). We are creatures of habit and logic. Lewis believes that the moral law is not taught to us rather known by us instinctively. He also believes that the law is real. The law is our behaviors in life via good or bad. Lewis states, “there is something above and beyond the ordinary facts of men’s behavior”(30). This opens Lewis to believe that the natural law is both alive and active in mans life today. Lewis goes on to say that the law must be something above mans behavior. He begins to relate this to the creation of the world.

    Read More

  • Humanity And Morality In Mere Christianity By C. S. Lewis

    1410 Words  | 3 Pages

    While maintaining a open look of this moral law, Lewis presents two objections one would present to the moral law: “The moral law is just herd instinct” and “Morality is just social convention. The moral law is not a herd instinct due to man’s choice to suppress stronger instincts in fa...

    Read More

  • Lewis Means By The Law Of Nature, And The Law Of Nature

    2067 Words  | 5 Pages

    1. Explain what Lewis means by the “Law of Nature” or the “Law of Human Nature.”

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Divine Command Theory

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    Cultural Relativism and the Divine Command Theory both had a tough time explaining why culture and God had the rights to state what is considered moral behavior. Especially when you lay your trust on God to guide you on what is moral or not, you face dangerous risks because there is a possibility that God is just a make-believe person up in the sky. Hence, humans who follow God’s words can misinterpret his meanings and cause immoral behavior in society. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism appeals to an authority that is present on this in this world, society and cultures. Nevertheless, society and cultures should not be relied on to indicate moral and immoral behavior because it is questionable to believe that our actions become moral just for the reason that our culture or society accepts them as normal. Despite the differences between The Divine Command Theory and Cultural Relativism, they both are theories that just fall short of their

    Read More

  • Natural Law Vs Divine Command Theory

    648 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Theory of Natural Law, defined in three aspects, there being a natural order in the world, everything having a purpose and how things are and how things ought to be. This theory also states that humans can distinguish between what is right or wrong through human reason/moral knowledge. On the other hand, the Divine Command Theory is a view of morality and believes that what’s right or wrong is set by God’s moral commands. God’s commands tell us what is morally obligatory, permitted and wrong.

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemma Case Study

    1453 Words  | 3 Pages

    Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interest, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). The leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible in understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act

    Read More

  • Ethics in the Modern World

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    Ethics is a system of moral principles and a branch of philosophy which defines what is acceptable for both individuals and society. It is a philosophy that covers a whole range of things that have an importance in everyday situations. Ethics are vital in everyones lives, it includes human values, and how to have a good life, our rights and responsibilities, moral decisions what is right and wrong, good and bad. Moral principles affect how people make decisions and lead their lives (BBC, 2013). There are many different beliefs about were ethics come from. These consist of; God and Religion, human conscience, the example of good human beings and a huge desire for the best for people in each unique situation, and political power (BBC, 2013).

    Read More

More about Reflection: Comparing Ethics And Conflict Resolution

Open Document