Rebellious Silence Analysis

662 Words2 Pages

Shirin Neshat, Faith Ringgold, and Zhang Hongtu are three of the many artists who capture the humanities of various societies and cultures in the world through their artwork. Those three artists had excellent pieces of art that all symbolized something different but connected them to the world and how society is portrayed: Neshat with her artwork called, “Rebellious Silence,” Ringgold with hers called, “God Bless America, 1964,” and finally, Hongtu’s work, “Bird’s Nest.” The three artworks all display a message of some sort to society, symbols, and even history behind it. Shirin Neshat is an iranian artist who lives in New York City. The artwork “Rebellious Silence” by Shirin Neshat portrayed a very strong message. The purpose of her work was to explain what the current …show more content…

The government took away his painting because it was “too dull,” but really it was because Hongtu wanted to share what was really going in China that the government was not sharing. Two general themes displayed within the painting was human rights and to be yourself and not to believe whatever you see and hear. In China, they did not want to discuss anything remotely close to human rights and always shared information that wasn’t true and the people would fall for it. They would fall for the government’s propaganda. The hidden messages are also human rights because the government constantly tells the people what to believe and who to hate. Hongtu says in an interview with White Hot Magazine, “The deeper problem is that most people only have one source for all their information, the government...For me if I want to criticize you first I must get to know you, not just make accusations based on the government’s propaganda.” The purpose of his work was to raise awareness to the issue at hand: the government was overpowering the people’s human rights and no one seemed to

Open Document