Reasons for employers to adopt pay –for-knowledge pay programs "Pay-for-Knowledge systems give employees higher pay as an incentive for each new skill or job they learn". Many organizations of today are like to adopt these pay for knowledge system because of it can use regardless of specialized industry and sizes of company and especially suitable for the medium size organization between 150-2000 employees. Under such plans, a typical employee starts at a base rate, and as he or she learns different jobs in the organization, the pay rate increases simultaneously. There are six reasons for adoption; to removes entitlement label, connects pay to job-related abilities, increase employee autonomy, technological innovation and increased global competition. Among them, increased global competition and technological innovation is the main reason to adopt the par for knowledge plans. Technological Innovation As information travels faster and faster and more reliably, barriers of distance disappear, and businesses are realizing how easy it is to outsource jobs overseas. Technological implication such as mails, texting, websites and personal digital products applications, known as “apps," can help companies improve communication with consumers and world-wide supplier as well as outsourcing refers to the practice of hiring employees who work outside the company or remotely. In line with this, Job demands, higher level of reading, writing and computation skills, technical skills, the skills of understanding the cultures and interpersonal skills become important factors to drive efficiency and improve quality at globalized working enviroment.Business technology helps automate back office functions, such as record keeping, accounting and... ... middle of paper ... ...ncourage the employees for continuously learning by employees in order to be employable and relevant in the industry and this requires the organization to tailor the compensation plan appropriately. Pay-for-knowledge plans have been hypothesized to offer many advantages to organizations and employees. For example, many analysts suggest that organizations experience greater work force flexibility, leaner staffing, greater work force stability, higher quality of output, lower absenteeism, less turnover, and higher productivity . Likewise, analysts also say that employees in pay-for-knowledge systems may benefit from higher motivation, higher job satisfaction, higher pay satisfaction, increased feelings of self-worth, more opportunities for growth and development, increased job security, improvements in the quality of worklife, and higher organizational commitment .
Compensation is made of a base salary (paid by the hour, work or the year; excluding overtime or bonuses), variable pay (bonuses, profit sharing/stock options which work hand and hand with the performance of the company), and benefits (to include health insurance/savings plans – 401(k), or tuition reimbursement). The traditional way of determining base pay for jobs was to compare jobs in the same industry. Now industry and market, no long work by themselves, the current thinking is more person-based that considers knowledge, skills, and competencies of the work. This, however, is best suited for high-performing environments that remain flexible in their deployment of human capital.
Although Susan’s plan to “just do what her competitors are doing” (Nelson Education, 2013) may have not been the best approach to follow, it is in The Fit Stop’s best interest to match their compensation policy to those business’s similar to them. There is no need for The Fit Stop to lead with the best compensation options around, but lagging with the compensation could repel employees and could push them towards working for a competitor.
Henderson. Compensation Management in a Knowledge-Based World. 10th Edition. Pearson Learning Solutions, Bookshelf. Retrieved from: http://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/0558582451/pages/14878186
The major objective of incentive plans is to preserve a company most capable people. In order to maintain the competitive edge, companies have to award incentive plans and bonuses that are similar or greater than other companies. The retentive of the best talent is merely a one benefits with offering incentive plans, when employees receive incentive for their work production tend to increase along with the company’s profits.
Performance related pay is a financial reward given to employees whose work is considered to have reached a required standard or is above average. “PRP criteria can relate to the individual employee, to work groups or to the organization as a whole” (Armstrong, 2002). It is fair to provide people with financial rewards as a means of paying them according to their contribution (Armstrong 1993:86). The primary purpose of performance related pay in any organization is to recruit, retain and motivate the workforce. It also helps in focusing employees’ minds on particular goals (Protsik, 1966); communicate to employees an organization’s core values, and change the culture of that organization (Kessler and Purcell, 1991).
...r investigate what sort of rewards or fringes would their employee’s desire compared to the old method of monetary incentives for the beneficial for the company”.
The foundation for effective job performance and compensation system can be traced to effective job analysis process. Fundamentally, a job analysis should consist of a thorough examination of the job 's duties and knowledge, skills, abilities, and qualities that are required in order to be successful in a specific position, upon which appropriate rewards or compensation can be determined. For many perspectives, jobs are usually made up of requirements and rewards, where rewards may be regarded as a major recruitment strategy for motivating potential employees in order to influence them to stay the organization for a longer period as well as enhance their performance. The most common or basic form of rewards which attracts employees is extrinsic
Most will agree that knowledge is the ‘key’ resource in this post-industrial economy. The challenge for many companies is developing an organization that creates and cultivates knowledge and learning. Pay plays a significant role in shaping workplace behavior. Most of the traditional pay systems reward the job the individual performs rather than the skills he/she brings to the job. The system is not being able to reward the things the company needs and this presents a barrier. The trend has moved away from pay for the value of the job, service and seniority. It is being replaced with paying for skills, knowledge, competency, performance and productivity, all which can be delivered through different invitations, from changes to base pay to introducing gainsharing.
The above examples of pay show that the more skills, experience employees are with the organization the more they are compensated. Organizations would benefit by utilizing the same practice’s Disney extends to their workforces. For those businesses whose primary purpose of their plan is to only meet compliance requirements could greatly benefit by developing a comprehensive benefit plan. This could help increase their return on investment. The value I believe a business may gain from Disney’s compensation plan is to appeal to competent workers, to maintain those workers, and to motivate workers to direct their energies towards achieving the goals of the organization. Companies can set up policies to conduct a market study on a regular basis to implement a real performance appraisal system and then work on retaining good employees and elimination of poor performing workers. By following Disney’s lead of in obtaining those who best fit their company’s culture and supporting the company’s Mission. To guarantee that the pay structure is externally competitive, a pay survey should be shown. The results of a survey to be valid, the market pay data must be from the relevant labor market for each benchmark job. I would advise that a survey of regional and global pay data should be collected from the company, because for example, most of the office support, HR and operations jobs will be filled by local applicants. A job analysis is the procedure of reviewing jobs in an alike business. The result of this process is a job description “that includes the job title, a summary of the job tasks, a list of the essential tasks and responsibilities, and a description of the work context “(Burke, 2008). A job description consists of the knowledge, skills and aptitudes necessary to do the job. A job evaluation is the process of adjudicating the comparative value of job within a company
The succeeding paragraphs will explain how innovations in employee benefits can improve the overall competitive compensation strategy of the organization. In order to maintain their competitive edge, companies need to fully understand that as the needs of their employee’s change, so does their benefit plans. Companies need to find innovative ways of engaging employees that encourage and support their commitment and improve their performance.
Employee compensation and reward systems have undergone a couple of paradigm shifts since inception. Reward systems were traditionally compensation based and focused on the individual or the position (Beam 1995). After a recession in the early 1980's, employers turned to performance based models in an attempt to save money while still rewarding top performers (Applebaum & Shapiro, 1992). Today, the most successful organizations are using a total reward model, a hybrid of the performance based model combined with strategic human resource management planning to create reward systems that both benefit the employee and help organizations realize their operational goals (Chen & Hsieh, 2006).
In large organisation, competition is not only in the market for goods and services but also for the quality of employees. As such, a large organization can only become attractive to the most skilled and high quality workers if it has an effective compensation and benefit plan. The key purpose of an effective compensation and benefit system is to provide employees with the right rewards for their work and right behavior in the workplace. Typically, organizational success is determined by the quality of employees an organization has. In turn, the organization can only attract such quality workers and maintain them through effective compensation and benefit
Establishing compensation practice requires for specific goals to be considered such as employee retention, compensation distribution and budget analysis. Organizations must balance each of these goals and also remain competitive in order to motivate employees and maintain fairness in the compensation program.
Compensation for today 's average worker has always been a highly sensitive topic for any employer. Determining fair compensation can be a overbearing task as there are many contributing factors that make up the general pay scale. When determining pay a company must always consider the hourly amount, the benefits that may be offered, any incentive that could potentially be incurred and ensuring that their employee have an established work life balance. For an employer to be successful in determining compensation for their associate they must remain grounded around 1 key principle. An employees compensation is determined by expertise, education and the daily duties performed by the employee.
The total pay package has a direct impact on the successful recruitment, selection and the retention of staff within any organization. This pay package is critical for any business to remain competitive in today’s business world. Competitive compensation packages are vital to both large and small organizations as they encourage the retention of talented staff.