Ratoon and Ascria - Angencies of Change

753 Words2 Pages

Ratoon

In 1969, there was a slight crack in the monolithic hegemony in the PNC and PPP’s organizational dominance on campus when Ratoon, a radical group comprised of academics and students, was established. The birth of this grouping led to a more multi-racial dynamic presence among students and faculty. Professors Clive Thomas, Josh Ramsammy and Omawale, and students Bonita Harris and Zinul Bacchus were prominent in this group.

Ratoon, like the ASCRIA possessed its own monthly publication. At its organizational height it published and circulated an estimated 3,000 copies of its newspaper. Apart from its absorption in the university, Ratoon challenged, with a strident anti-imperial voice, foreign penetration of the economy while providing support for labour struggles in which ASCRIA was also quite influential. Like ASCRIA and IPRA, Ratoon had its own limits. Clive Thomas clarified its activist hub and limits. He states Ratoon was a

“cultural group, yes, but also a politically-ideological group, in the most basic sense, in that we feel that we are fighting against centuries of the mystique, effects and wrong headedness of an alien ideology…we are not a political party, in our sense of the definition, We are no Office seekers..”

In other words, this was multiracial composition of students and faculty in one organisation representing a new dimension in university politics. This multiracial composition and unity was not long afterwards tested, as Zinul Bacchus discloses, with the visit of famed black power leader, Stokeley Carmichael (Kwame Ture). On his visit to Guyana in 1970 as a guest of Ratoon, Carmichael (later Kwame Ture) told a Queens’s College audience that Black power was only for people of African desc...

... middle of paper ...

... signaled a serious fall-out with the ruling political party. As if this were not enough, it was accompanied by ASCRIA’s criticism of the government response to striking workers in the bauxite industry. Kwayana likewise resigned from his position of Chairman of the state-controlled Guyana Marketing corporation in 1971.

By 1972, the breach between the PNC and ASCRIA was so pronounced that policemen searched the home of Kwayana for “guns, ammunition and explosives.’ The actions of Eusi Kwayana and ASCRIA are not to be underestimated as a crucial break with the old politics. This fallout had been simmering for a while even though, as David Hinds indicates, “between 1964 and 1971, the society supported the PNC on the basis of African solidarity.” According to Edward Greene, the formal split between ASCRIA and the PNC was announced in April 1973 by ASCRIA.

Open Document