Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impontance of acid base reaction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rates of Reactionsin Marble Chips Investigation
Aim ---
The aim of this experiment is to discover how the rate of reaction between Marble chips and Hydrochloric acid changes as the concentration of the acid is increased or decreased.
Background ----------
This experiment is using Marble chips and Hydrochloric Acid:
[IMAGE]CaCO3 + 2HCl CaCl2 + H2O + CO2
Hydrochloric Acid
[IMAGE]
+ Carbon Dioxide
Calcium Carbonate + Calcium Chloride + Water
The rate of reaction could be measured by a change in the following:
Colour
Formation of precipitate
Change in mass
Volume of gas evolved.
Time taken for given mass to disappear
pH
…show more content…
I will vary the concentration in 0.5 mol intervals ranging from 0.5 mol to 4.0 mol. Mixing different concentrations of acid with distilled water to make new concentrations changed the variable. E.g. To make 2.0 mol: 20ml of 4.0 mol 2HCl and 20ml of H2O are mixed.
Temperature: As the temperature increases, the particles are given more energy making them move faster and react faster. To maintain the same temperature during the experiment the equipment was held in a laboratory at room temperature (approx. 20°C).
Particle size: When one reactant is solid, the reaction takes place on the surface of the solid. If the surface area is increased then the space for the reaction to take place is increased. To keep this variable constant, medium sized chips were used throughout. The chips were also weighed to confirm that they all had identical masses.
Prediction:
I predict that the results from this experiment when plotted on a graph will create a curved best-fit line. The results therefore will not be proportional. I predict the graphs will have the
…show more content…
The acid was warmer than the other older acids and this could have had some effect on the reaction. Little could be done about it and human error had to be accounted for.
The medium marble chips all came from the same bucket, but these were not all the same size. Even though they were weighed to ensure the same mass, different numbers of chips were in these masses and if there were more there was a greater surface area for the reaction to take place.
The measuring of the quantities of acid required was done carefully using the measuring cylinders, but ensuring the meniscus of the liquid were at the identical level each time was impossible and these tiny errors may have accounted for some anomalies.
The readings were all repeated three times in an attempt to increase accuracy and eliminate anomalous results. In places where the lines have crossed each other, I have concluded that these occurred
In conclusion the experiment was carried out and had great success proving my prediction to be correct and enabling solid and valid results which were able to be put in a graph. I believe my prediction could have been more accurate or more backed up if I had made a quantitative prediction. Though what I believed would happen did happen during the experiment which helped to understand the graph and the results which led me to be able to write a thorough report on them.
Overall I believe that I got all the data I needed, and I felt that
Discussion: The percent of errors is 59.62%. Several errors could have happened during the experiment. Weak techniques may occur.
Rate of Reaction Between Marble Chips and Hydrochloric Acid. The aim of this experiment is to find out how different variables affect the rate at which the reaction between Marble chips (CaCO ) and Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is used. There are many variables that affect the rate of this reaction such as the following. 1.
Evaluation I think that the method used in the experiment is not very accurate because the way we measure the amount of gas produced is not very
to the marble chips. I will have 30 ml of mixture and split it in to
limestone chips, I will use 3g all the time and use 2 moles of acid.
One possible source of experimental error could be not having a solid measurement of magnesium hydroxide nor citric acid. This is because we were told to measure out between 5.6g-5.8g for magnesium hydroxide and 14g-21g for citric acid. If accuracy measures how closely a measured value is to the accepted value and or true value, then accuracy may not have been an aspect that was achieved in this lab. Therefore, not having a solid precise measurement and accurate measurement was another source of experimental error.
When test results don’t have accuracy, additional testing may be needed to authenticate the results.
When the hydrochloric acid was poured into marble chips, gas bubbles were seen – signifying the carbon dioxide (gas) that was being produced due to the chemical reaction.
From working out how much fuel has been used I can work out how much
Experiment to Find the Reaction of Potato Chips in a Salt Solution. Aim: to find a reaction of potato chips in a salt solution. Hypothesis: I predict that the potato will change in mass. The difference will occur in accordance to the difference of concentration of the salt solution each potato chip is submerged in.
.... The tests were all similar to one another and the results were moving as predicted. After repeating it with three different people per age group, most of the results had no big differences. The range bars were not very far apart and were closer together because of how similar the results were even before calculating the averages. This shows me my results are quite reliable because most of the data collected was alike, so they were not misinterpreted or mistakes.
An investigation into how changing one variable influences the rate of reaction between marble chips and dilute Hydrochloric acid
There is also the potential of human error within this experiment for example finding the meniscus is important to get an accurate amount using the graduated pipettes and burettes. There is a possibility that at one point in the experiment a chemical was measured inaccurately affecting the results. To resolve this, the experiment should have been repeated three times.