Radical Conceptual Shift

1330 Words3 Pages

Is there a radical conceptual shift in theory of mind between the ages of 3 and 4 years? Explain how research evidence supports your views

The 4th birthday, a radical conceptual shift or the result of a gradual change?
A part of being a grown-up is knowing how to interact with people, how to make them happy or simply knowing how to empathize with a person feelings and intentions, which is a rather more complex process than it might seem at a first sight. For instance, in order for a child to be able to perform all of above need to acquire the concept of the theory of mind, as defined by Hala (1997): “A framework for predicting and explaining what people think and do”.
A controversial question in acquiring the theory of mind is that whether …show more content…

Gopnik speculated, that perhaps children had not yet acquired the principles that would allow them to explain and predict other’s people behavior.
Even latter research (Gopnik 1993, Perner 1991, and Wellman et al. 2001), argue that there is a radical conceptual shift at around 4 years old, that completely revolutionize the way children think about the world. The essence is that children go through a qualitative change, but there is also much support for a quantitative change.
An important implication can be addressed from the study of time children spend on thinking of the correct or incorrect answer. Kikuno et al. (2007) found that children took as long to reply to a question about the protagonist’s belief whether their answer was correct or incorrect. These findings might infer that on a general sample, there are no big differences in the cognitive capacities of the participants. Therefore, this points out to a conceptual deficit rather than a weak …show more content…

What should be outlined here is that reformulating the question might lead to a better overall performance, but to what extent are the researchers supposed to refine the question? The definitive method of asking cannot be objectively measured, but deciding not to introduce terms like ‘think’ cancels the fundamental principles of theory of mind. Understanding for instance, the initial version of the deceptive box test (‘What did you originally think was in the box?’), as it’s been originally introduced by Gopnik and Astington (1988), in my view, really tests the capacities of a child whether he has a strong sense of the theory of the

Open Document