Racism In Jane Smiley's The Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn

849 Words2 Pages

Why would a man who fought against slavery, injustice, and discrimination write a racist book ? For some time, many students, educators, and scholars debated whether The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain deserves its place in our literary canon. Certain readers find the relationship between Huck and Jim especially problematic due to abundant use of the N word and Twain’s stereotypical depiction of Jim. On one hand, Jim is viewed as an uneducated slave who is always in peril due to Huck’s playfulness and immaturity. Yet, on the other hand, Jim is a complex secondary character crucial for Huck’s development from naiveté into maturity. Despite, the glaring overuse of racial epithets, Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn should remain in the literary canon and continue to be taught as it allows readers to address racial misconceptions, such as racial …show more content…

However, many opponents fail to consider that Twain’s emphasis on outside problems makes the novel worthy of being a literary canon. Author, Jane Smiley, of “Say it Ain't So” argues that Twain’s inability to accurately represent racism re-emphasizes the racism feeling mentality. Smiley claims “ If Huck feels positive towards Jim, and loves him, and thinks of him as a man, then that is enough. He doesn’t have to act according to his feelings” (Smiley 63). Yet, Smiley fails to acknowledge the power of thought on each person's actions. The main reason people in Huckleberry Finn act in certain ways is dependent on their personal thoughts. Thus, the ability to amend a person’s perceptions can affect future actions. Twain does not make Huck only change his preconceived racial attitudes, but makes Huck make crucial decisions between “what society deems correct” versus “ doing what is right”. Thus, Smiley’s argument is ultimately invalid by failing to concede Huck’s actions toward

Open Document