Puar And Fag Analysis

630 Words2 Pages

After 9/11, drawings of bin Laden being anally penetrated showed that the American public’s way of retaliation is to “emasculate” him through sodomy and to “turn him into a fag”. In Jasbir K. Puar and Amit Rai’s “Monster, Terrorist, Fag: The War on Terrorism and the Production of Docile Patriots”, they discuss why this kind of behavior, in a country depicted as feminist and gay safe, is accepted as an appropriate reaction to terrorism. To start to understand this, an examination of U.S. policies is needed. Queer studies should pay attention to current US-led international politics because it is a reproduction of the oppressive sexual and racial discourses that were used against other marginalized groups in history.
Sexuality is central to the …show more content…

foreign and domestic policies because they are built on discourses that separate marginalized groups and usually do not tackle the root of the problem. Queer activists need to address the absence of intersectionality in their approach. When queer organizers discovered that a Navy bomb had “Hijack This Fags” scrawled on it, they “objected to the homophobia but not to the broader racist war itself” (Puar and Rai 127). Queer organizers zeroed in on a slur rather than the real destruction of innocent Muslim lives and the violence of the war. There seems to be an “us vs. them” mentality in current activism turns a blind eye to other marginalized groups as long as “our own” people are advancing. Furthermore, many of the foreign policies do not focus on underlying problems. For instance, the U.S. decides to combat the lack of women’s rights in Afghan by flying RAWA, a relatively privileged organization, around the world instead of focusing on helping the majority of women in Afghan that are suffering real consequences of injustices (Puar and Rai 130). Although promoting these issues is important, an emphasis on helping real Afghan women should be the

Open Document