Psychoanalytic Criticism Of Macbeth

1921 Words4 Pages

Psychoanalytic Criticism: Macbeth William Shakespeare is the most prominent writer in English literature. His plays have transcended time, excellence, brightness, and Western culture. Macbeth is the last of the four “great tragedies,” the shortest, and darkest. Macbeth was first published in the Folio of 1623 but written approximately in 1606. In context, King James I was a supporter of Shakespeare’s acting company. Most evidently, Shakespeare wrote some of his plays to delight the King’s taste. Macbeth is a clear example of the close relationship with the King. In the play, one of the leading characters, Banquo, is a noble figure from the King’s Scottish lineage. Additionally, the play embodies entities of evil and witches that fascinated …show more content…

In Macbeth’s soliloquy, the conscious empowers the unconscious. “At the nonrational level of Macbeth’s psyche, conscience registers as “a dagger of the mind”: pricks of conscience that have assumed murderous, self-mutilating proportions” (Chauchi 337). In order for Macbeth to commit the murder, he has to do the act knowing with conscious. He must lose the principle of morality and enters in sublimation, which is satisfying the impulse with a substitute object, in this case, Macbeth’s desire for power. Shakespeare uses Macbeth character to exhibit the horrendous effects of ambition and guilt in men’s nature. From this point, Macbeth’s dramatic fall develops from his superego that makes a person feel guilty if the principle of behavior is not followed. The ego acts as a mediator between the id and superego to prevent an overwhelming anxiety (McLeod). Macbeth’s response is the result of anxiety, guilt, paranoia, fear, and distress. He plans a series of murders to protect his permanence as King. He orders Banquo’s death, Lady Macduff, and Macduff’s son. Macbeth’s paranoiac stage and inner conflict cause him to see Banquo’s ghost, and he has a confrontation between reality and metaphysical. He mislays the rational goal of being a fruitful king, and the tragic tension of his ambition drives him to become a tyrant. As Macbeth turns as an unscrupulous murderer, Lady Macbeth is not capable of losing her whole morality principle, so …show more content…

Although, Macbeth is incapable of controlling his acts and she could not constrain him. Her inability to control drives her to a conflict between the id and superego that takes her to a cathartic moment. She wants to appear as a morally figure that is why she makes look the guards as the killers of Duncan. When Macbeth’s action could not be cover, It transgresses her false morality she slow slide into madness. The guilt of Macbeth’s crimes consumed her and reduced her to a stage of delusion where she could not accept her reality. In that instance, she is no longer satisfying her id and loses all purpose of being (Harris 83). Desperately, she tries to wash away the distortion invisible bloodstains. Her guilt causes her to kill herself, “Here’s the smell of the blood still. All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand…Wash your hands, put on your nightgown, look not so pale. I tell you yet again, Banquo’s buried; he cannot come out on’s grave” (V.i. 50-51,

Open Document