Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Smoking Ban In Public Places
Smoking Ban In Public Places
Smoking Ban In Public Places
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Smoking Ban In Public Places
For a long period of time, public smoking around hospitals has always been an issue. In the article for “South Dakota V. Dole” a question is asked concerning the hospital funding of states that do not enact public smoking bans, and whether or not to withhold five percent of the funding. I insist that the federal government should be able to withhold five percent of hospital funding from states that do not enact public smoking bans because smoking is hazardous to the health of patients who are in the hospital and to the smoker, it can be controlled, and is a waste of hospital resources. To begin with, smoking is a cancerous activity. Most patients who come through hospitals all around America are either obese or have a problem with smoking.
With the looming statewide ban, many smokers feel that they have had their rights taken away, and are left with very little options.
Hello Mr. Schneider and classmates. Are you aware that more than 443,000 people die annually in the United States from cigarettes including deaths from second hand smoke, so why is smoking still legal? Although there are specific restrictions such as where smoking is permitted and not permitted in certain states of the U.S. it should be banned completely throughout the United States of America.
Smoking tobacco has long been an accepted form of recreational drug use despite a history of flip-flops of public opinion. The negative effects of smoking were not thought of or even known until the early 1900’s. (“Introduction to Smoking”) Over the last few decades there has been an ever increasing surge in the United States and all over the world to ban smoking in public places. The goals of these smoking bans are to prevent the numerous diseases and health complications that are produced from exposure to the toxic smoke and to improve the overall health of society. Some disagree with these motives by claiming that smoking bans have not actually saved any lives or prevented people from taking up the habit. Contrarily, global research now actually shows that smoking tobacco kills people both directly and indirectly; indirectly, of course, referring to second-hand smoke. Another argument against these smoking bans is that a number of people feel as though they infringe upon their individual rights. These people believe they have a right to smoke tobacco anywhere they choose; not unlike many people who also believe they have a right to avoid forced exposure to deadly second-hand smoke. One might wonder which of the two takes precedence. Another very important thing to consider is while these smoking bans may appear to have a good intent they present to society a difficult scenario if imposed and maintained; they threaten to set a precedent for the restriction of other freedoms that humanity may take for granted. Smoking bans may be justifiable but, like many other prominent moral dilemmas, it may take centuries if not millennia to satisfactorily answer the questions brought forth by the issue.
Recently, the House of Representatives approved a bill which stated that smoking should be banned in the private clubs and bars of Vermont. The bill was approved by the House and sent to the Senate for further approval. Ultimately, it seems that the bill was accepted in the House in part because of an emotional plea made by Rep. William Aswad, and also due to the argument that it covered a serious health issue. Rep. Aswad told the group that when his wife had died six year, three months, and fourteen days earlier that the official reported cause of death was simply cigarettes. He said, “I stand before this body is strong support of this bill. I respectfully ask this body to do likewise.”
It has been suggested that we consider refusing to hire smokers to help reduce these costs. Other companies such as Weyco, The Cleveland Clinic, and the Massachusetts Hospital Association have already implemented such a policy. Statistics show that smokers cause increased health care costs and lower productivity, due to increased absenteeism and more breaks, if smoking is allowed on the premises.
One of the largest and most problematic health issues in our society is smoking. Smoking is currently the leading cause of death in our country, due to its harmful and addictive contents, such as nicotine and tobacco. Although millions die from it each year, smoking is the single most preventable cause of death. Without smoking, a tremendous amount of money and lives will be saved. I think that our country should ban smoking and the production of cigarettes in order to maintain a healthier nation, help save the environment, and prevent the almost 1000 deaths that they cause in fires each year.
Results of several researches from studies have proven that concentrations of tobacco smoke in public places possess the risk to individuals, children, and the environment. Even cigarette butts are equally hazardous for the environment and many creatures, especially in the sea. Cigarette filters are the single most picked up thing in international beaches cleaning every year [5]. Smoking ban can benefit in several ways – from saving of lives, the prevention of disability, to a dramatic decline in health care costs – majority of which are carried by nonsmokers who otherwise are impelled to pay exaggerated health insurance premiums and higher taxes. The recently laid ban on smoking in public places is a smart move. Support of smokers for smoking ban in public places is truly much-needed to make it successful. Smoking is extremely harmful to the health of nonsmokers and to nature; smokers should be self-discipline, socially responsible, and avoid smoking in restricted public outdoor areas even if no official eye is catching them.
Smoking is a serious public health concern in the United States. It is responsible for at least 30% of all cancer deaths, causes
The government of India has many arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising. One of the arguments is the right of the government to step in and promote a healthier lifestyle. Many of the tobacco advertising companies stated that the ban on advertising was unconstitutional, but the supreme court in Belgium and France both agreed that the ban was not unconstitutional and was needed the ensure the public health. In 1990 tobacco attributed to over 3 million deaths and escalated to 4.023 million deaths in 1998. Studies show that when people quit smoking they spend their money in different sectors of the economy creating more jobs and economic growth. Tobacco consumption in countries that had a ban showed a dramatic decrease in consumers
Smoking is one of the leading killers in North America and innocent. people shouldn't die because of it. For years people have been smoking. in public thinking, "It's my body, I can do whatever I want to do." now that it has been proven that smoking not only harms the smoker.
Cigarette smoking has been a controversial topic for the last few decades. There are two main sides making an argument, for and against. Many people started smoking because they believed it would make them look cool, lose weight, or they were pressured into cigarette smoking by their peers. However, cigarettes can do a lot of harmful damage to the smoker or any person who comes into contact with the smoker. The people in favor of cigarette smoking believe it is good for many reasons, but those opposed to smoking believe it should be banned in public places. There are numerous reasons why the smoking of cigarettes should be banned including: the many health risks for the smoker, the damage of secondhand smoke to those around them, and the rising
Everyday someone loses his or her life due to previously inhaling cigarette smoke. Although banning smoking in public places will not altogether end the loss of people’s lives, it will be a leap towards reducing their risk. Smoking in public has become an act that most people consider normal. Smokers do not think twice about smoking in public, and the non-smokers are simply used to being around smoke. To reduce health related issues linked to cigarettes, a ban against smoking in public places should be put into motion to protect non-smokers, to improve the health of smokers, and to reduce the overall use of tobacco products among smokers while protecting their rights.
The sale of cigarettes and tobacco is a multi-billion dollar industry, but is it truly worth all the problems that stem from their use. Health care costs are extremely high due to all the health problems associated with cigarettes and tobacco. Even though research has proven time and time again the harmful effects of cigarettes, and the rising cost of health care caused by cigarettes our government will not take a stand and stop all manufacturing of the horrible toxins.
Smokers feel they have had the right to smoke in a public place for so
Smoking is not only bad for health it is also as bad for the people