Pros And Cons Of Neoconservatives

869 Words2 Pages

War frenzy has gripped the hearts and minds of the neoconservatives in Washington and London. For the first time in history, the Russians and the Americans are dropping bombs on the same country. This is wonderful news is it not? Yes, if you're not a neocon. Neoconservatives are hell-bent on war, terror, and supernationalism. They profit from military expenditures via the military industrial complex, and push governments into illegal wars of aggression. I.e Vietnam and Iraq. Insightfulness is a key trait of President Putin. His understanding of the neoconservative foreign policy of the United States has led him to the conclusion that watching another legitimate government fall at the hands of CIA backed terrorists is a crime which must be …show more content…

I very nearly forgot that the West always ignores the plight of innocent Shia in the Middle East. One can look at Bahrain, where the autocratic Sultan and his family are Sunni, yet oppress the Shia majority. If one protests in the streets against the dictatorship, then one is likely to receive a life sentence...if you're lucky. Why is that we never hear about this oppressive regime? Simple. Bahrain is a puppet of the neoconservatives and does its bidding. Syria is just another step in the neoconservative game plan to control the Middle East. Unabashed support for Israel, listing Hezbollah as a terrorist organization even though it remains part of the legimitaley elected government of Lebanon, and permitting the Turks to back Jabhat Al-Nusra are prime examples of the sheer fanaticism of neoconservatives on both sides of the pond. President Putin is no Saint, but he certainly is a savior. He's a savior for the Alwaites who face certain annihilation if the Salafis take control of the provinces of Latakia and Tartous. Of course, this is not the only reason, or even the main reason that the Russians are intervening in Syria, but it's significant

Open Document