Pros And Cons Of Decolonization

1607 Words4 Pages

POL4881
RE: Somaliland Fundamentally, the United States should recognize Somaliland as an independent state. This territory fulfills the criterion put forth in Article 1 of the 1933 Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States. However, the international community’s reluctance to change previously drawn territorial borders verges on an outright refusal. One easily sees this in the case of the Kurds and their plight for a homeland. Unfortunately, this dedication to drawn borders only strengthens regarding decolonization and the states that it created. This fixation around decolonized states indicates a norm of constructivist behavior concerning them and their sovereignty; yet, as we see in the case of South Sudan, realist sentiments, …show more content…

First, Somaliland has a precedence of distinction from Somalia. While Somalia was under Italian rule until 1960, Somaliland was a British Protectorate. Upon their decolonization, the two regions, in the interest of bringing all Somali-speakers into one state, united. Significantly, however, there was a five-day delay between Somaliland’s liberation and its decision to unite with Somalia. Had it not made this decision, Somaliland would have surely been recognized as its own independent state. This is their government’s and their proponents’ chief argument (Council on Foreign Relations, 2018). Second, Somaliland fulfills the criteria put forth in the Montevideo Convention. Somaliland has a population of around four million; its territory is clearly defined and historically established; it has a fully functioning government with democratic elections in a multi-party system; it has a functional police force and army; and it has the capacity to enter into relations with other states(UNPO, Member Profile: Somaliland, 2017). In short, Somaliland fulfills all customary criteria for statehood under international

Open Document