Pros And Cons Of A National Park: Providence Canyon

438 Words1 Page

I am definitely against the federal regime's decision not to make Providence Canyon a national park. I believe that the Providence Canyon should become a national park for a variety of reasons in which I will discuss in this essay. The reasons I believe that it should become a national park are it is an immensely colossal tourist magnetization in the state of Georgia, the way it was made is very ingenious, and that people are in love with views in the canyon. In this essay I will tell you why Providence Canyon should be a national park.

Providence Canyon should authentically become a national park, but the federal regime is not on the same page as everyone else. I personally and dearly believe that Providence Canyon should become a national park because it has an environment that is special to it and that you can not visually perceive anywhere else in Georgia other than at this canyon. Withal, this canyon's history is astounding how it came to become in present day Georgia. This canyon was partially composed long ago by old time farming methods which would not even be developed for another 100 years or so. Without kenning, the farmers had not perceived how consequential the preservation of the land genuinely was. With that being verbalized, the excess amount of water from the farms eventually eroded and etched the soil on the land, and again afterward, minute ditches were engendered. Then, natural causes such as rain, would make these ditches expand wider and wider until the farmers carved gullies. These gullies had eventually eroded into deep …show more content…

The Providence Canyon is visited by tourist millions of times a year because of its comely scenery. That number of visitors a year is as many times as a national park itself, so why will the federal regime not make it a national park. That is why I believe that the Providence Canyon should become a national park with a view of a state

Open Document