President Trump And Media Censorship

1697 Words4 Pages

President Trump and his administration are again in conflict with the media. This turmoil was brought on by a series of remarks made by the president and his press secretary. He and his press secretary plan to hold the press accountable for their honest but tasteless reporting of the president. The Constitution offers these journalists only limited protection, meaning that only certain protections are allowed under the first amendment. The First Amendment provides minimal protection for the press, and over the past decades, courts have proclaimed that it prohibits censorship by the government and offers slight protection against defamation lawsuits. The protections were originally supposed to be used for political expression, and they still …show more content…

Nowadays, big and small newspapers are closing across the country, and the fight for freedom of the press is dying with them. The fight for freedom of the press includes but is not limited to the belief that we should have stronger laws to protect journalists and reporters. The public’s willingness to be in-the-know has also become increasingly less important. Three-quarters of Americans trusted the media about 50 years ago, and the press translated this unwavering supports as a way to get information. The relationship between the press and government officials has also changed immensely. The press and government officials used to be in constant communication about the facts, but the only time they communicate is to bicker in a he-said-she-said argument fashion. The public used to depend on the media for coverage of political events but the press is now significantly biased and not credible according to viewers of news networks around the …show more content…

Freedom of the press was originally designed to be a form of political expression and it still is nowadays. Since we were not there when the Constitution was written, we must do our best to interpret what the founders meant, but we could be wrong. Even though the actual writing says that the Congress shall make no law restricting freedom of the press, however, I do not believe that means the president is legally obligated to spill his day to day rendezvous to reporters. I just think that is meant to mean that the reporters and journalists have a right to acquire and publish true information through legal ways of gathering such information. The First Amendment was originally written to ensure there would be no legal consequence for speaking out about the government, but we now live in a different world and I feel that the Constitution needs to be applied to the way the country is run

Open Document