Preserve Our Unalienable Rights Essay

478 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: The difference between anti federalist and federalist

“As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety. “
What exactly does that mean? Unalienable rights are rights that can’t be given or taken away. This is similar to our natural rights. Natural right are in fact rights that cannot be violated or taken away from us by law. From my understanding “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety. “Is saying as long as we have and can keep our natural rights we will be okay. With that being said the anti-federalist were the type of people who felt that is the national government had too much power than our natural rights basically won’t matter. This group or people felt as if the power should be in the hands of the state and his people while keeping the national government below the state. I for one don’t like the idea of the government being in charge of these rights. That would mean that could dictate my life and how we choose to live. An antifederalist thought that the government's potential to become corrupt and seize more and more power until its tyrannical rule completely dominated the people.

“The bill or rights the first ten amendments to the US Constitution, ratified in 1791 and …show more content…

Today our nation uses a federal system as we all know. This system is broken into 3 branches: the judicial, legislature, and executive powers. This group believed that “Vigor of government is essential to the security of liberty.” Basically they felt that the more power that was put into the government the better the nation will be, with the nation being the highest of the high in terms of power. This group was very organized unlike the anti-federalist. But again the more power that you may supply to a person or group can cause “dictator syndrome” as I would say. Is this something you would think would benefit you or your family? It is like risking our freedom by agreeing with the federalist idea if we were in that time

Show More
Related

  • The Importance Of Bill Of Rights In Education

    422 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Bill of Rights was crafted in 1791 by James Madison. It was put in place to protect the rights of all people within the borders of the United States when it is applied by the government. It is a very important document that means a lot in the hearts of Americans.

    Read More

  • Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist

    852 Words  | 2 Pages

    The. The Anti-Federalist claimed that the sovereignty of the states was to be maintained then the states must be granted the vital powers of government and the power of Congress is limited to the United States. However, they claimed that this was not. under the Constitution of the United States. The Constitution gave Congress unlimited power and did not explicitly detail any control.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Anti Federalists

    1505 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Anti-Federalist Papers documented the political background in which the Constitution was born. The Anti-Federalist saw threats to rights and authorizations in the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists thought that the Constitution created too strong a central government. A central government is the political authority that governs the entire nation. They felt that the Constitution did not create a Federal government, but a single national government. The Anti-Federalist proposed a “Bill of Rights”, to make sure the citizens were protected by the law. Anti-federalists continued to view a large and powerful central government as leading to autocracy, appealed to the actions of the British king and Parliament to demonstrate their point. Anti-Federalists

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Anti-Federalist And Anti Federalists

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    Anti –federalist believed that with out the bill of rights, the national government would became a to strong it would threating the americans peoples rights and libertys. Due to prior american revolution, ant-federalist did not forget what they fought for an believed that with a stronger national government, the president could become kind if he wanted. During this time people still feared a strong central government, due to british occupany of the states. Concidently the of people who wanted the bill of rights and were anti-federalist were famers and the working class, as to the fedarlist were extremely rich and powerful people Thomas Jeferson who was a active anti-federalist once wrote to james Madison A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular; and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inferences. (Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, 1787. ME 6:388, Papers

    Read More

  • Essay On The Tenth Amendment

    1240 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the Tenth Amendment in the Bill of Rights: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Though last in the Bill of Rights, it is one of the most powerful and ever changing in interpretation over the course of America’s history. Some historical events that altered its meaning include the Civil War, The Civil Right’s Movement, and even modern event’s like the Supreme Court ruling on gay marriage. In this paper I will discuss how the Tenth amendment has a large effect in both America’s history, but also how it is now portrayed America’s present.

    Read More

  • Essay On Ratification Of The Constitution

    1213 Words  | 3 Pages

    While the Federalists believe in a strong, central government, the Anti-Federalists believe in the shared power of state and national governments to maintain the rights of all Americans .The Anti-Federalist favored a confederated government were the state and national governments could share power ,protect citizen’s freedom ,and independence. The Anti-Federalists found many problems in the Constitution. Many were concerned the central government take was all individual rights. Anti-Federalist primarily consisted of farmers and tradesmen and was less likely to be a part of the wealthy elite than were members of their rival the Federalist. Many Anti-federalists were local politicians who feared losing power should the Constitution be ratified and argued that senators that served for too long and represented excessively large territories would cause senators to forget what their responsibilities were for that state. They argued that the Constitution would give the country an entirely new and unknown form of government and saw no reason in throwing out the current government. Instead, they believed that the Federalists had over-stated the current problems of the country and wanted improved characterization of power allowable to the states. They also maintained that the Framers of the Constitution had met as a discriminatory group under an order of secrecy and had violated the stipulations of the Articles of Confederation in the hopes for the for ratification of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist were sure that the Constitution would take away the rights of the American citizens and fought hard to stop the ratification on the

    Read More

  • Power Hungry In America

    779 Words  | 2 Pages

    George Mason explains that when a man has power, he does not use that power with discernment. Once that power is in his hands, he will only crave for more. The nature of power to man is to utilize that power and gain more and more. Mankind are selfish and will only focus on their interests first and forget about the interests of people. A man will do whatever it takes to gain that power. Power is like an addiction, once you acquire a little bit of it, you will only want more. In summarization, man is currently power-hungry and has been power hungry from the beginning of time and will continue to be power-hungry till the end of ages. For this a government is needed and a constitution that all people will be able to comply with and this is the biggest safeguard. Everyone, regardless of their position will have to follow the constitution. The constitution keeps everything fair and is a good safeguard because with this no one will be oppressed and no one will be able to get too powerful either, so it's balanced and fair to everyone. Today this system is valid, because in the current news you can see that people are still very power-hungry and

    Read More

  • Fourth Amendment

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1787, the Constitution, created by a group of men known as the “Framers”, is the highest law in the United States. At first, the Constitution was not ratify because it did not have a bill of rights which is a list of rights that belong to the people. Therefore to allow changes to the Constitution, the Framers created the amendment process. In 1791, congress proposed twelve changes to the Constitution. Ten of the twelve changes were agreed to by the states and were called “The Bill of Rights.” Some of these rights include the right of free speech, the right to practice your own religion and the right to be silent if you are arrested.

    Read More

  • Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    448 Words  | 1 Pages

    One of the aspects of our government preventing tyranny is Federalism. Federalism is the separation between the state and national governments. This prevents both the states and national from tyrannising. If the states didn’t have governments the national government would have absolute control over the states. We need the national government to keep the states together, while still making some decisions on their own behalf. (Doc. A)

    Read More

  • The Bill of Rights

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Bill of Rights derives from the Magna Carta, the English Bill of Rights, the colonial struggle against king and Parliament, and a gradually broadening concept of equality among the American people. The bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse. The absence of a "bill of rights" turned out to be an obstacle to the Constitution's ratification by the states. It would take four more years of intense debate before the new government's form would be resolved. The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. In the end, popular sentiment was decisive. Recently freed from the despotic English monarchy, the American people wanted strong guarantees that the new government would not trample upon their newly won freedoms of speech, press and religion, nor upon their right to be free from warrant less searches and seizures. So, the Constitution's framers heeded Thomas Jefferson who argued: "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land. Early American mistrust of government power came from the colonial experience itself. Most historians believe that the pivotal event was the Stamp Act, passed by the English Parliament in 1765. Taxes were imposed on every legal and business document.

    Read More

  • Unalienable Rights Essay

    504 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Thomas Jefferson, all men are created equal with certain unalienable rights. Unalienable rights are rights given to the people by their Creator rather than by government. These rights are inseparable from us and can’t be altered, denied, nullified or taken away by any government, except in extremely rare circumstances in which the government can take action against a particular right as long as it is in favor of the people’s safety. The Declaration of Independence of the United States of America mentions three examples of unalienable rights: “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. I believe these rights, since they are acquired by every human being from the day they are conceived, should always be respected, but being realistic, most of the time, the government intervenes and either diminishes or

    Read More

  • Process Philosophy in American Society

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Bill of Rights and Later Amendments." Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 14 Feb. 2014.

    Read More

  • J.D. Salinger's A Catcher in the Rye

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    Madison, James. The United States Bill of Rights: First 10 Amendments to the Constitution. 15 12 1791. 10 11 2013 .

    Read More

  • Tenth Amendment Essay

    1467 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our bill of rights all began when James Madison, the primary author of the constitution, proposed 20 amendments for the bill of rights and not the ten we know of today. Madison sent these twenty proposed rights through the house and the senate and was left with twelve bill of rights. Madison himself took some out. These amendments were then sent to the states to be ratified. Virginia was the tenth state out of the fourteenth states to approve 10 out of 12 amendments. This two-third majority was necessary to make the bill of rights legal. On December 15, 1791 the bill of rights were finally ratified.

    Read More

  • Beliefs of the Anti-Federalists

    722 Words  | 2 Pages

    One argument that the Anti-Federalists had against the forming of a new constitution was that they claimed it would “lead to a new consolidation system of government” and the leaders of Philadelphia intended “such a system and that the consolidated system would in the end destroy republican government and individual liberty as well as the independence of the states.” (Lewis 2) The Federalists feared that the government would have so much power it would be abused. They were constantly speculating about what would happen to the Unit...

    Read More

More about Preserve Our Unalienable Rights Essay

Open Document