Postman's Argument Analysis

270 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negative impact of technology on literature

In the article Postman’s strengthens his argument by not only speaking his mind on what he believes but by also providing proof why he sides with Huxley. He says that, “As nowhere else in the world, Americans have moved far and fast in bringing to a close the age of the slow-moving printed word, and have granted to television sovereignty over all of their institutions. By ushering in the age of television, America has given the world the clearest available glimpse of the Huxleyan future, 2000.” He doesn’t just agree with what Huxley said he gives proof that because of these electronics like the TV we have started veering towards the future that Huxley said where nobody would even want to read books. I would again have to say that his viewpoints

Show More
Related

  • Postman's Analysis of Brave New World

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    To conclude, Postman's analysis that Huxley's vision of the future has become more of a reality than that of Orwell's.  Although the present day is not exactly how Huxley had envisioned it, our society will soon reflect the one created in Brave New World if it continues to progress as it had in the past few decades.  Orwell's prediction does not hold much relevance in today's society. Our government is not constantly watching over us, they have more important difficulties to overcome.  Government is not concerned with the actions of individuals; they base their decisions on the opinions of the masses.  Huxley's travesty holds far more relevance than the prestigious social theory of Orwell.

    Read More

  • Strawson's Argument Analysis

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    I agree with Strawson in saying that we are not truly morally responsible for what we do, in a mental respect at least. Though it suffers from many faults, there are also ways to even more clarify his argument, as I will hope to do so in the following. First off, Strawson states that for someone to be truly morally responsible, we have to understand the points that he has given. The first being that we do what we do because of the way we are. These just states that the things we do and decide are based upon how we are in that moment, in mental respects. For example, when it comes to choosing what to eat between options A or B, I will choose option A because of how I am. But if you were to choose, it would be dependent on the way that you are

    Read More

  • Carral's Argument Analysis

    738 Words  | 2 Pages

    Héctor L Carral, a multimedia engineer wrote an article titled Stop Saying Technology is causing Social Isolation for The Huffington Post. The author of the article has a biased option, therefore does not include any research that would refute his argument. Carral states “it’s only obvious to blame them [technology] for some of society’s problems. Carral also states I believe that accusing technology (and, again, especially smartphones) of ruining social interaction and even all kinds of experiences is, to say the least, quite wrong and misguided. There was an obvious division between the commenters who agree with Carral and those who disagree with his argument. The demographics of commentators. From observing the occupations that the commenters listed, it was apparent the people who were against Hector Carral’s article were parents and educators while the people who agreed with his

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Neil Postman's Influence On Society

    1268 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the intro of my essay, I listed vague examples about how television impacts society. Throughout my content I did not elaborate on Postman’s believed the age of typography was, and the difference between the past and the age of show business today. In addition, I lacked comparing Postman’s argument to Francis

    Read More

  • Amusing Ourselves To Death and Lies My Teacher Told Me

    502 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the first chapter of Amusing Ourselves To Death , Neil Postman's major premise is how the rise of television media and the decline of print media is shaping the quality of information we receive.Postman describes how the medium controls the message, he uses examples which include the use of clocks, smoke signals, the alphabet, and glasses.Postman says a society that generally uses smoke signals is not likely to talk about philosophy because it would take to long and be too difficult. Postman also describes the way television changes peoples way of thinking; a fat person will not look good on TV and would less likely be elected President. On the other hand someones body is not important as their ideas when they are expressing them through the radio or print. On TV, visual imagery reigns. Therefore the form of TV works against the content of philosophy. Postman shows how the clock has changed. Postman describes how time was a product of nature measured by the sun and seasons. Now, time is measured by a machine using minutes and seconds. The clock changed us into time-watchers, then time-savers, and finally time-servers. Thus, changing the metaphor for time changed how we view time itself.

    Read More

  • 1984 Vs Brave New World

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the Halloween of 1938, H.G. Wells’s The War of the Worlds premiered on the radio in America, causing panic and confusion on a national level. To illustrate, Huxley’s theory that entertainment will impact a society on how its citizens think, how they record and display information, and how they communicate with one another is best displayed by the aforementioned incident. This incident arose because this radio drama (intended to entertain) was presented in a decontextualized and abrupt manner—stating that aliens had invaded the earth— and most people indubitably believed it. In addition, this situation can be supported by Postman’s term, “news of the day,” forming an image that society’s media can control its citizens to form opinions and emotions rather than take immediate action when presented with unorthodox news or

    Read More

  • English 111 Argument Analysis

    591 Words  | 2 Pages

    On December 2,2015 I went to to the Lynnhaven building to receive some feedback on my agreement paper for English 111. It was a very rainy day after running through the rain when I reached the writing center room. There was a yellow note saying that the writing center was in the student center until December 4,2015. After reading the note I ran back in the rain to my car.It was to cold to walk it was raining. As I approached the student center I was told by a security guard that the tutoring lab was located on the third floor. I had walked up three flights of stairs. When I had finally reached the third floor,I walk into the tutoring lab. There were about eight tables, but only four staff members and one student. Amen had approached me asking what did I need help with today. I replied saying that I would like some feedback on my paper for English. He then pointed to the writing table and said “she can assist you with your paper”.

    Read More

  • Neil Postman

    1557 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his novel, Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman describes to the reader, in detail, the immediate and future dangers of television. The argument starts out in a logical manner, explaining first the differences between today's media-driven society, and yesterday's "typographic America". Postman goes on to discuss in the second half of his book the effects of today's media, politics on television, religion on television, and finally televised educational programs. He explains that the media consists of "fragments of news" (Postman, 1985, p.97), and politics are merely a fashion show. Although Postman's arguments regarding the brevity of the American attention span and the importance of today's mass media are logical, I do not agree with his opinion of television's inability to educate.

    Read More

  • Neil Postman's Technopoly

    3243 Words  | 7 Pages

    Postman divides history into three types. He begins his argument with discussion of tool-using cultures. In these cultures, technology has an "ideological bias" to action that is not thought about by users. He says that this is a time of "logic, sequence, objectivity, detachment, and discipline," where historical figures such as Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, and others clung to the theology of their age. This was a world with God, which was concerned with truth and not power. Postman remarks that the mass production of books and the invention of the printing pre...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Amusing Ourselves To Death

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Neil Postman’s thoughts toward television and education would sadly not change after thirty years, but more technologies such as laptops, tablets, cell phones, and even social media would be added to the curriculum. Neil Postman would most likely be appalled at the amount of information I learn through the internet, and the formats that I learn the information in. For example, BuzzFeed News is an application on my cellphone that give information through videos, music, and images. All the formats that television used, but quicker.

    Read More

  • Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology by Neil Postman

    1131 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nevertheless, Neil Postman wrote a very thought-provoking novel that should make all Americans rethink their lives, even if it is just a little bit. Postman was very critical in his novel, but he provides a wakeup call for everyone that has not come into contact with the nasty reality technology can have on society.

    Read More

  • Brave New World

    513 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a great deal of evidence that supports the idea that we, in the twenty first century, are headed toward the society described by Huxley in Brave New World. Such things as advances in technology, government yearning for complete control, and an uncontrollable world population are many of the reasons Huxley’s world might become our own.

    Read More

  • Neil Postman's Technopoly: The Judgement Of Thamus

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author uses this short story to show similarities with the world today. The main point that he is trying to get across is that every technology has both good and bad effects within a society. "We are currently surrounded by throngs of zealous Theuths, one-eyed prophets who see only what new technologies can do and are incapable of imagining what they will undo" (p.5). Postman goes on to criticize Thamus for only looking at the downsides of writing and not thinking about the potential benefits to writing, that he in turn tends to

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Fair 1984 By George Orwell

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    Postman did very well with his use of Kairos, or situational based appeal in this paper, which definitely helped add more to the overall persuasiveness of the piece. One example of how he did this was when he stated: “What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us.” (p. 449) The reason that this would be effective is because he was speaking at a book fair, where people who care about books and the prevalence of reading in society, if he had done this at any other place, at a different time, it may have lost some of the effect on the audience. His use of this particular statement really would have appealed to the audience at the time because of their interest in books, and their understanding of the importance of

    Read More

  • What Is The Difference Between 1984 And George Orwell's 1984

    1327 Words  | 3 Pages

    When people predict the future, they usually foresee events or advances that they want to experience, such as world peace or flying cars. This is the case in neither Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World nor George Orwell’s 1984. In both novels, Huxley and Orwell extract their fears from their own minds and place them into a futuristic society. Social critic, Neil Postman, contrasts both of these author’s fears. In his contrast, Postman determines that both Huxley’s fears and representation of a future society are more prevalent in modern society than those of Orwell’s. What makes Postman’s assertion true is the acceptance of oppression and the effects of technology which Huxley’s society and the modern United States share over Orwell’s society in

    Read More

More about Postman's Argument Analysis

Open Document