Political Propaganda In Ancient Rome

803 Words2 Pages

Modern representations of Roman culture tend to ignore its centuries-long history, assuming consistency throughout ancient Rome. Although there was continuity, Roman architecture and spatial planning witnessed changes over centuries. Changes in politics, religion or knowledge of technology can often be perceived from buildings of different periods, as public constructions remained a major part of imperial propaganda. Topographic changes in the city of Rome during the reign of two important Roman emperors, Trajan (r. 97-117 AD) and Constantine (r. 306-337 AD), unveiled progression in engineering techniques, specific aspects of the emperors’ political propaganda, as well as changes in beliefs held by the people of Rome. Trajan reigned 97-117 …show more content…

As a part of his new Forum, Trajan built a new basilica, Basilica Ulpia, which carried name of his family (Packer 34). On the other hand, the construction of the Constantine’s basilica, known as Basilica Nova, started during the reign of Maxentius, Constantine’s opponent in the civil war but Constantine continued and completed its construction. It was the first basilica built in Rome after the time of the Emperor Trajan and was located on the Via Sacra near the temple of Venus and Roma (Kleiner 296). As part of their political propaganda, both emperors used the basilicas for self-promotion. On the outer part of the Basilica Ulpia stands a statue of Trajan driving chariot with four horses (Packer 34). Likewise, Constantine placed his portrait in the west apse, on the same site where Maxentius planned to place his statue (Kleiner 296). Basilica Nova was slightly smaller in size, 300 feet long and 215 feet wide, compared to Basilica Ulpia which was 400 feet long and 200 feet wide. There was also difference in building materials and roof design. Instead of traditional stone and wood, Basilica Nova was built from concrete. In place of the traditional wooden roof of Basilica Ulpia, Basilica Nova had small coffered barrel vaults in the aisles, which allowed the interior to be better illuminated (Kleiner 297). These differences are reflective of the advances in …show more content…

The Arch of Trajan was placed at Benevento on the road Via Traiana which connected Rome with southern Italy. The Arch depicted Trajan’s achievements during his military campaign, his building successes, and the emperor as pontifex maximus and the benefactor of the poor (Kleiner 165). The Arch of Constantine, however, was built in honor of his victory over Maxentius, an opponent in the civil war. Maxentius was simply referred to as the “tyrant” in the dedicatory inscription, potentially intended by Constantine to erase the opponent’s name from public memory (Kleiner 294). The Arch of Constantine was placed near the Colosseum and in the inscription, Constantine thanks to “divinity” for granting him the victory, not to openly name the Christian God (Kleiner 294). This deliberately vague reference was likely to avoid conflicts with traditional pagan religions and foreshadowed Constantine’s efforts to transform Rome into a Christian

Open Document