Political Life and Man’s Ultimate End: Reading the De Regno of St. Thomas Aquinas

2549 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Describe man as a political animal

St. Thomas’ purpose in writing the De Regno is to provide practical guidance for a Christian king on how it is that he ought to conduct his proper authority. The king, imitating God, is to lead those subject to him to their proper end, and this will be nothing other than communal virtue. This instantiation of the practice of citizen-wide virtue is the intrinsic finality belonging to political society, and for St. Thomas, it is the genuine concern of the king to lead and direct citizens towards the common good. However, before treating of the precise content of the common good of political society, and the specific means through which the king should bring this about, St. Thomas will present two principles that are fundamental for his treatise: 1) that man is naturally a political animal; and 2) the common good is the proper end of political society. Before establishing the first principle, that man is political by nature, St. Thomas tells us that “in all things which are ordered towards an end, wherein this or that course may be adopted, some directive principle is needed through which the due end may be reached by the most direct route.” Since man is a being who has an end towards which his life and actions are ordered, it is necessary for him to have some directive principle which leads him towards this end. This directive principle for man is nothing other than reason. While this directive principle of reason is good for man, it is not sufficient for attaining his end: “if man were intended to live alone, as many animals do, he would require no other guide to his end, but each man would be a king unto himself, under God, the highest King, inasmuch as he would direct himself in his acts by the light of reason given to him from on high.” It is the case that man, for St. Thomas, more than any other animal will seek to live in a group, for he is social and political by nature. Following these initial remarks, St. Thomas will then proceed to argue dialectically to establish the truth of his first principle. Man’s reason has been given to him for the purpose of providing all those things which are necessary for his life, but an individual man is incapable of garnering all these necessities on his own. Furthermore, unlike other animals, each individual man is unable to create all the things necessary for his life. With these two points taken together, Thomas has arrived at his first principle: “It is therefore necessary for man that he lives in a multitude so that each one may assist his fellows, and different men may be occupied in seeking, by their reason, to make different discoveries—for example, one in medicine, one in this and another in that.” Notice that this affirmation of man’s natural orientation to live in political society is not a fully developed account; Thomas has not yet accentuated the unique difference of political society from all other associations. He will take up this point later on in chapter 3 of book 2, wherein he treats of the finality of political society. After establishing that man is political by nature, St. Thomas goes on to defend why it is necessary for there to be a political authority governing a multitude: “F... ... middle of paper ... ...d the polis. In fact, this hierarchical order enables Aquinas to articulate and defend man’s perfection as he exists within political society, and show that it is ultimately inferior to that supernatural perfection attainable only by grace. Moreover, this natural perfection is not opposed to man’s supernatural happiness, since grace presupposes and builds upon the instantiation of those virtues that are the common good of political society. St. Thomas concludes this section by reiterating a foundational component of Catholicism, namely, that man’s ultimate happiness is not to be found in an earthly city, but transcends the political community. This prudential doctrine clarifies and concretizes the positive and substantial, albeit limited, aim of the ruler, since “if this end could be attained by the power of human nature, then it would be necessary that the office of a king would have to include the direction of men to it. We are supposing that he is called king, to whom the supreme power of governing in human affairs is entrusted.” Man’s supernatural end is incapable of being fully actualized in this life; it can only be brought about by divine government and the outpouring of grace, which properly belongs to the ministry of the Catholic Church and its priests. In light of this integration and crucial distinction between the intrinsic and extrinsic finality of the polis, articulating the precise content of the common good and man’s ultimate happiness beyond this life, St. Thomas can provide concrete guidance for how the king can inculcate genuine virtue in his subjects.

Show More
Related

  • The Influence of Locke and Hobbes on Government

    1741 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke have authored two works that have had a significant impact on political philosophy. In the “Leviathan” by Hobbes and “Two Treatises of Government” by Locke, the primary focus was to analyze human nature to determine the most suitable type of government for humankind. They will have confounding results. Hobbes concluded that an unlimited sovereign is the only option, and would offer the most for the people, while for Locke such an idea was without merit. He believed that the government should be limited, ruling under the law, with divided powers, and with continued support from its citizens. With this paper I will argue that Locke had a more realistic approach to identifying the human characteristics that organize people into societies, and is effective in persuading us that a limited government is the best government.

    Read More

  • The Virtues of the Populace: Cicero Marcus Tullius

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    Cicero’s essay, titled On Duties, presents a practical approach concerning the moral obligations of a political man in the form of correspondence with his young son. Essential to the text, the incentive for Cicero to undertake On Duties emerges from his depleted hope to restore the Republic within his lifetime. Cicero therefore places such aspirations in the hands of his posterity. The foremost purpose of On Duties considers three obstacles, divided into separate Books, when deciding a course of action. Book I prefatorily states, “in the first place, men may be uncertain whether the thing that falls under consideration is an honorable or a dishonorable thing to do” (5). Cicero addresses the ambiguities present under this consideration and codifies a means through which one can reach a justifiable decision. Subsequently, he expounds the four essential virtues—wisdom, justice, magnanimity or greatness of spirit, and seemliness—all of which are necessary to conduct oneself honorably. As a result, the virtues intertwine to create an unassailable foundation upon which one can defend their actions. Cicero’s expatiation of the four virtues, though revolving around justice and political in context, illuminates the need for wisdom among the populace in order to discern a leader’s motivations. This subtly becomes apparent as Cicero, advising his son on how to dictate decision-making, issues caveats regarding the deceptions that occur under the guise of virtue.

    Read More

  • Are Human Estranged In Essence

    1176 Words  | 3 Pages

    The lawyer and scholar believed that there should be one universal government ruling the people, this government would be a led by a mix of all three classes. He states how a monarchy would be the ideal rule, but is extremely unrealistic as all humans reason equally. By instating a mixed form of government, people would feel more of a connection with the laws and more of a personal responsibility to follow them if they had a part in creating them. Additionally, all people would be seen as equal before the law as all have equal capabilities and through effort, a common good can be achieved; the only thing differentiating humans is their variety of gifts, besides this, there is no variation. A person’s economic status by no means defines their ability to lead, by all groups participating in government, there are no idle citizens that are not a part of the

    Read More

  • Comparing Morality in The Prince, Second Treatise of Government, and Utilitarianism

    2060 Words  | 5 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill present three distinct models of government in their works The Prince, Second Treatise of Government, and Utilitarianism. From an examination of these models it is possible to infer their views about human nature and its connection to the purpose of government. A key to comparing these views can be found in an examination of their ideas of morality as an intermediary between government and human nature. Whether this morality must be inferred from their writings or whether it is explicitly mentioned, it differs among the three in its definition, source, and purpose.

    Read More

  • Religion In William Cavanaugh's Torture And Eucharist

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    The modern state seeks its self-preservation above all else, and history reveals that governments are more than willing to exercise their monopoly on force and coercion in order to cement and defend their authority (5-6). Normally, unified social bodies such as the Church seek to counteract the dominance of the state through their public and political influence. However, when the Church simultaneously abdicates its political connections and powers and interiorizes itself within individual Catholics, it frees the state to exercise its will with little backlash: “Once the church has been individualized and eliminated as Christ’s body in the world, only the state is left to impersonate God”

    Read More

  • Exploring the Anthropological Principles in Paine´s Common Sense

    1744 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thomas Paine begins his article by first exploring the differences between society and government. He explains that, “society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil.” (Frohnen 179) What he means by this is that to have society and community is a privilege, because we as humans are designed to have a need for human interaction, while government on the other hand is only a necessary evil, simply because we as humans are also designed to be inherently evil, and therefore government is a necessary evil to have in order to monitor wrongdoing, or to keep us from our own vices in other words. This emphasizes the Classical Christian Anthropological principle of duality, which is the inner struggle that we as humans have between amor sui, the love of self, and amor dei, the love of God. This struggle springs from the fact that evil is found within man, and we must mak...

    Read More

  • Natural Law, Rationality and the Social Contract

    2087 Words  | 5 Pages

    Each day, billions of people throughout the world affirm their commitment to a specific idea; to be part of a society. While this social contract is often overlooked by most citizens, their agreement to it nevertheless has far-reaching consequences. Being a member of society entails relinquishing self-autonomy to a higher authority, whose aim should be to promote the overall good of the populace. While making this decision to become part of a commonwealth is usually performed without explicit deliberation, there is a common consensus amongst philosophers that something unique to the human experience is the driving force behind this decision. Contained within this something are highly contested points of debate amongst both past and contemporary political philosophers. Two such philosophers are Thomas Hobbes and Thomas Aquinas. Each of these political writers provide detailed arguments regarding the concept of natural law, the role that reason plays in this law, whether some laws are considered truly rational, and why some people choose not to follow certain principles even when they recognize them to be rational. By analyzing each of these arguments, we will arrive at the conclusion that even though the rational principles that reason provides us can easily be disregarded by the populace, that we can still find a common good within promulgating rational doctrine.

    Read More

  • The First Crusade and the Ideas of Crusading

    2006 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the ten-century, particularly in France, the world had become an extremely violent place. Feudal Knights were often quarreling over land possession, looting, and looking to lay people to provide them with sustenance . Likewise, the power of these knights and the extent of violence flourished due to the increasingly lacking power and authority of the kings . The Church, in an attempt to halt the violence and anarchy attempted to take control and issued such concepts as “the Peace of God” . Similarly, at this time other movements for peace by the Church were underway, and one of the commonly held ideas was the need to transform the world to more “monkish ideals”. From these ideals also sprouted the concept of the laity having “God-given functions to perform, functions that could include fighting to protect the Church”. Pope Leo IX (1049-1054) is an example of this idea; he often used militia to fight against his opponents. In the early eleventh century, there came a pivotal figure in the ideas of Church sanctioned war, Pope Gregory VII (1073-1085). Pope Gregory was involved in the Investiture Contest, and soon turned to scholars to seek out “justification for his conviction that violence could be used in defense of the Church and could be authorized by it”. The movements generated by Pope Gregory, as well as the results of the Inve...

    Read More

  • Of Prince Klemens Von Metternich's Political Confessions Of Faith

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Political Confessions of Faith, Metternich identifies two elements that are most important to a nation. These two are the precepts of morality, religious as well as social, and the necessities created by locality (2). Metternich explains that whenever society strays from these elements, the only thing it its wake is bloodshed. Because of new ways of thinking, the people of this time period’s values and morals have changed. Lavish living has become more important than worship. The revolution caused the sense of locality to vanish, along with the necessities created by it. Lavish spending and entitlement led people to revolt.

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan and John Locke's Second Treatise of Government

    3013 Words  | 7 Pages

    Hobbes’ Leviathan and Locke’s Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes’ and Locke’s writings center on the definition of the “state of nature” and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best. This difference arises from different conceptions about human nature and “the state of nature”, a condition in which the human race finds itself prior to uniting into civil society. Hobbes’ Leviathan goes on to propose a system of power that rests with an absolute or omnipotent sovereign, while Locke, in his Treatise, provides for a government responsible to its citizenry with limitations on the ruler’s powers.

    Read More

  • Aquinas Definition Of Happiness

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    The importance of the ultimate good must act as an entire rule of life, we must behave in a matter that is tending to the perfect good (Stephens, 2015, p. 324). Aquinas argues that for every action there must be an order of intention, that there must be a final cause that motivates us to act in the first place,this action must be always be reliable and consistent for the intention of the cause which is the ultimate good (Van-Nieuwenhove & Wawrykow, 2005).

    Read More

  • Homosexuality and the theories on divinity

    1387 Words  | 3 Pages

    “And we will see how Godless of a nation we have become,” (Armstrong). Today’s society has beckoned upon the revival and renewal of several laws mandated by men and women who think they have comprehended what God deems as righteous and sinful. The older populations of adults see homosexuality as sin, where one person cannot love another of the same gender without them being damned to Hell, whereas the younger population addresses the need for love and happiness among any and all groups of people. Saint Thomas Aquinas’s states these ideas and what God wants based on his theories. Aquinas’s ultimate goal was to achieve ultimate happiness within form of a divine afterlife with his God, and he has generated theories and models for others to follow to reach this goal. In this paper I plan on explaining Aquinas’s view on homosexuality in comparison to the Bible’s by using the Summa Theologiae, the Theory of Natural Laws, and the Divine Command Theory.

    Read More

  • State and Morality: The Necessity of Injustice

    1468 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his treaty On Law, Thomas Aquinas defends the position that “the law is always something directed to the common good”. Laws are thus directed toward a comm...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

    1570 Words  | 4 Pages

    The argument referring to the nature of human beings and government is one that been debated for hundreds of years by many of the world’s greatest minds. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two opposing philosophers who have devoted many years to studying this subject. For Locke, the state of nature— the original condition of all humanity before civilization and order was established—is one where man is born free, equal and have rights that others should respect, such as the right to live and the right to liberty. For Hobbes, however, the state of nature is one of constant war; solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short ; it is, in Hobbes’ mind, civilization that separates humans from their primitive state. Hobbes believed that an individual’s only

    Read More

  • What is Moral Theology?

    1416 Words  | 3 Pages

    Modern Catholic social teachings trace its beginnings to the writings of Pope Leo XIII. His insight on Christian philosophy, politics and the social order and applies to teachings in current injustices in the economic order. Leo XIII’s teachings were also critical participation in the developments of modern social and economic life. He rooted his social ethics in the supreme value of the human person and added that all political and social structures need to respect and respond to this primary and moral claim of human dignity. While the Church and the political community are autonomous and independent of each other in their own fields, the Church is “at once the sign and the safeguard of the transcendental dimension of the human person”.

    Read More

More about Political Life and Man’s Ultimate End: Reading the De Regno of St. Thomas Aquinas

Open Document