Políticos Analysis

2059 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: An essay about political parties from the emergence

Los partidos políticos han existido desde que existe la vida o obra política. Aunque las condiciones políticas hayan sido otras han estado ahí, antes se llamaban facciones, banderías, camarillas, etc. Se puede decir que “mientas haya diferencia en el modo de ser humano, y siempre las habrá, habrá partidos”(1). Mientras haya desconfianza y diferentes intereses económicos, políticos y sociales, van a ver partidos políticos. Los partidos políticos son instrumentos usados para la lucha constante de clases. Existen muchas diferentes definiciones para los partidos políticos pero la definición mas concreta la dice Andrés Serra Rojas, y afirma que “Un partido político se constituye por un grupo de hombres y mujeres, que son ciudadanos en el pleno ejercicio de sus derechos cívicos y que legalmente se organizan en forma permanente para representar a una parte de la comunidad social, con el propósito de elaborar y ejecutar una plataforma política y un programa nacional con un equipo gubernamental”(1).

En México, la Constitución garantiza la existencia de partidos políticos. En el articulo 9º dice “No se podrá coartar el derecho de asociarse o reunirse pacíficamente con cualquier objeto lícito; pero solamente los ciudadanos de la República podrán hacerlo para tomar parte en los asuntos políticos del país. Ninguna reunión armada tienen derecho a deliberar.” Es decir que todos tenemos derecho a asociarnos o reunirnos para tomar parte de los asuntos políticos del país (partidos políticos, asambleas, asociación, protestas, etc.), pero debe ser de manera pacifica (no guerrillas). Sin embargo, para que un partido político se pueda integrar, debe tener ciertos requisitos que exigua la Ley Federal Electoral.

El primer partido político de la era co...

... middle of paper ...

...RD se llevo el puesto mas importante que han continuado hasta la fecha; la gobernación de la capital de México. Posteriormente, el PRD ha crecido mucho, siendo AMLO su principal candidato pero no han podido superar al 2do poder de oposición, el PAN.

En conclusión, los partidos políticos en México han surgido gracias a muchas políticas impuestas por los 80 años del PRI en el poder. El PAN surgió gracias a la inconformidad de muchos políticos durante el Maximato. El PRD surgió gracias a tantas contradictores que han estado unidos alguna ves en el PRI. Durante todo el siglo XX existieron diversos partidos de izquierda en México, pero en mi opinión, gracias a la cercanía de Estados Unidos, y la guerra fría. Estos no pudieron avanzar. Porque si analizamos a fondo, durante todo el siglo XX, en América Latina predomino el socialismo y comunismo, pero en México no.

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of The Vanguard Of The Atlantic World By James Sanders

    349 Words  | 1 Pages

    This paper will be exploring the book The Vanguard of the Atlantic World by James Sanders. This book focuses upon the early 1800 to the 1900 and explores the development of South American political system as well expresses some issues that some Latino counties had with Europe and North America. Thus, Sanders focus is on how Latin America political system changes throughout this certain time and how does the surrounding countries have an effect as well on Latin political system. Therefore, the previous statement leads into some insight on what the thesis of the book is. Sanders thesis is, “Latin American’s believed they represented the future because they had adopted Republicanism and democracy while Europe was in the past dealing with monarchs

    Read More

  • Liberals and Conservatives in Post Revolutionary Latin America

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    Models for post-revolutionary Latin American government are born of the complex economic and social realities of 17th and 18th century Europe. From the momentum of the Enlightenment came major political rebellions of the elite class against entrenched national monarchies and systems of power. Within this time period of elitist revolt and intensive political restructuring, the fundamental basis for both liberal and conservative ideology was driven deep into Latin American soil. However, as neither ideology sought to fulfill or even recognize the needs or rights of mestizo people under government rule, the initial liberal doctrine pervading Latin American nations perpetuated racism and economic exploitation, and paved the way for all-consuming, cultural wars in the centuries to come.

    Read More

  • Film Analysis Of The Movie 'La Dictadura Perfecta'

    1756 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nevertheless, the movie undoubtedly mirrors many of the current socio-political time in which the film was made. The title itself refers to a famous quotation from the Nobel Prize-winning author Mario Vargas Llosa, who once referred to Mexico's ruling party, the PRI, as a "camouflaged dictatorship," thereby making it "the perfect dictatorship." In this way, the movie is directly acknowledging its relevance to modern Mexico and its politics and is clearly very self-aware. The plot itself was based on the real life perceived Televisa controversy during the 2012 Mexican presidential election, in which Mexican citizens believe that the media was unfairly showing a preference for the PRI candidate, Enrique Peña Nieto. While it could be argued that the movie takes this idea of favoring one candidate over another to extreme lengths (although perhaps it isn’t showing anything unduly unrealistic – there’s no real way to know) and hyperbolizes the effect of the media in Mexican politics, there is clearly a strong element of truth and reality there. The movie would not have had nearly the same effect if it was not at least somewhat grounded in reality. And I think that, while the media does not have absolute and final control over politics, they do to a very large and important extent and this extends far beyond the movie alone, especially in today’s age of fake

    Read More

  • Latin America when It Was Under Liberal Rule

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    Time and rules have been transforming countries in many ways; especially, in the 1850’s and the 1920’s, when liberals were firmly in control across Latin American region. Liberalism can be defined as a dominant political philosophy in which almost every Latin American country was affected. A sense of progress over tradition, reason over faith, and free market over government control. Although each country was different, all liberals pursued similar policies. They emphasize on legal equality for all citizens, progress, free trade, anti-slavery, and removing power from church. Liberals declared promising changes for Latin American’s future. But Latin America had a stronger hierarchical society with more labor systems, nothing compare to the United States societies. Liberals weren’t good for Latin America. What I mean by “good” is the creation of a turning point or some type of contribution towards success. I define “good” as beneficial or helpful. The Latin American economy was stagnant between 1820 and 1850 because of independence wars, transportation and the recreation of facilities. I describe this era as, “the era when Latin America when off road”.

    Read More

  • Mexico Versus United States Government

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States has no more important foreign relation ship than that of which it enjoys with Mexico, and vice versa. These two countries share interwoven societies and economies. Although there have been disagreements and turbulence between the two countries, which partnership is without these? The Strength of each country’s democracy is fundamental to the other’s. This relationship that the two countries share directly affects that lives of millions of Mexican and United States citizens everyday. Recently these two countries have become even more unified than ever before. Tackling issues such as Border Control, Countering Narcotics, Dealing with multiple Law enforcement agencies, Human Rights laws, trade and development, etc. There are many issues that they are mutually interested in and must deal with. Yet, there are some vast differences in which these two countries are run. There are also many similarities, which we must take into account. Both Democratic Governments have similar structures, containing a legislative, judicial, and executive branch. Yet, these structures are very different internally, containing specific duties that the other country’s branch may not have.

    Read More

  • Political Typology Quiz

    506 Words  | 2 Pages

    I got the Faith and Family Left result on my Political Typology Quiz. It says The Faith and Family Left combine strong support for activist government with conservative attitudes on many social issues. Fully 85% of the Faith and Family Left says religion is very important. Besides that, 51% of them want the government to do more to protect morality - the highest percentage of any typology group. This is an only typology group that is “majority-minority”.

    Read More

  • The New Science of Politics

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    When discussing the new science of politics laid out in the Federalist papers, it is imperative to understand that proponents of the Constitution had various reasons for writing these papers, not the least of which was convincing critics that a strong central government that would not oppress but actually protect individual freedoms as well as encouraging the state of New York to agree to ratify the Constitution.

    Read More

  • The French Revolution and Independence in Venezuela

    1801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Peeler, John A. Latin American Democracies. Chapel Hill, NC and London: The University of North Carolina Press, 1985. Print.

    Read More

  • Political Analysis

    1494 Words  | 3 Pages

    Political Analysis Political analysis is the method by which the judgement upon any political event, in any part of the world, is performed. It is based on the perception of the political reality of the region or the country in question and the perception of the relationship of this political reality with international politics. In order to perceive the international situation and international politics, it is imperative to have general outlines that explain the political reality of every state and the relationships of these states with the other states of the world, especially the major powers that influence the progress of events in the world. Since the Islamic Ummah is commanded to carry the Islamic Da'wah to all people, it is therefore obligatory upon the Muslims to be in touch with the world with awareness of its conditions and perception of its problems. The Muslims must acquaint themselves with what motivates the states and the peoples and pursue the political actions that occur in the world.

    Read More

  • Political Science Final Exam

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    1. In your opinion, which ancient political practice, protective or developmental republicanism, has had the greatest impact on our liberal democratic practice?

    Read More

  • The Mexican Revolution and Portfirio Diaz

    997 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...t up. This group of young leaders believed that they could assume their proper role in Mexican politics once President Díaz announced publicly that Mexico was ready for democracy. Although the Mexican Constitution called for public election and other institutions of democracy, Díaz and his supporters used their political and economic resources to stay in power indefinitely.”

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Marti And Sarmiento

    743 Words  | 2 Pages

    As the Latin American nations set out to construct a new government and society in the 1800´s, two opposing models aroused regarding which one would best benefit the countries. ¨Civilization vs. Barbarism¨ by Domingo Sarmiento, a recognized Argentinean revolutionary, contrasts Jose Marti´s ¨Our America¨ ideology which critiques U.S. capitalism and focuses on developing a good government based on the needs of the nations and each nation´s autochthony. Contrastingly, Sarmiento, guided by his beliefs in democratic principles, declares his preference towards the European urbanized way of life as the key to progress and stability for the nations. Despite the differences in the models proposed by Marti and Sarmiento for the New Nations to follow,

    Read More

  • Juan Linz The Perils Of Presidentialism Summary

    932 Words  | 2 Pages

    Who has the greater legitimacy to represent the people? The president or the legislatures. In comparing the Chilean 1970 Presidential Election to 1979 Spanish appointment of Adolfo Suirez as Prime Minister, Linz notes “Allende received a six-year mandate for controlling the government even with much less than a majority of the popular vote, while Suirez, with a plurality of roughly the same size, found it necessary to work with other parties to sustain a minority government”. Linz supports the fusion of the executive and legislative branches because it forces a sense of cooperation. He points out that “presidential systems may be more or less dependent on the cooperation of the legislature; the balance between executive and legislative power in such systems can thus vary considerably” Linz admits that “presidential elections do offer the indisputable advantage of allowing the people to choose their chief executive openly, directly, and for a predictable span rather than leaving that decision to the backstage maneuvering of the politicians.” but qualifies it by stating that it is only and beneficial if the majority of the people of spoken. In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Shugart’s critical appraisal of “The Perils of Presidentialism” they offer counter arguments when they suggest that a bicameral parliament can just as easily have dual legitimacy issues as a President and legislative body. It should be recognized that Linz does not address the checks and balances that allows for a more regulated government ensuring that power is not concentrated in the hands of one group. Nor does he address that elections

    Read More

  • The Underdogs by Mariano Azuela as a Reflection of the Mexican Revolution

    2162 Words  | 5 Pages

    The history of political instability in Mexico and its need for revolution is very complex and dates back to the colonization of Mexico by the Spaniards in the 1500s. However, many aspects of the social situation of Mexico when the Revolution broke out can be attributed to the thirty-year dictatorship of President Porfrio Diaz, prior to 1911. The Revolution began in November of 1910 in an effort to overthrow the Diaz dictatorship. Under the Diaz presidency, a small minority of people, primarily relatives and friends, were in ...

    Read More

  • Democracy in Latin America

    2755 Words  | 6 Pages

    Much G. L., 2004, Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers, Annual Reviews

    Read More

More about Políticos Analysis

Open Document