Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Platos symposium analysis
Plato Symposium Essay
Platos symposium analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Platos symposium analysis
Turia Pitt, a woman from Australia suffered burns over her face and body, her beauty was gone; however, her fiancé Michael Hoskins did not leave her because he fell in love with her inner beauty. (Sinha) Michael found the true meaning of love and although her physical beauty was gone, he stayed by her side because of her personality. In Symposium by Plato which is a work of different speeches from men on their interpretation of eros- love. Plato uses a conversation between Socrates and Diotima to explain the concept of beauty. Diotima was a coach to Socrates in his understanding of what the true meaning of love. Through, their conversation Plato stressed that when physical beauty fads all that is left is inner beauty. Plato’s analog is still …show more content…
A person who is unselfish is willing to put others above themselves without wanting anything in return. This type of beauty, I witness first hand as my aunt gave up twenty years of her life to care for my grandparents. She took care of my grandparents with little to no help from her sisters or caregivers. The care she provided my grandparents was back-breaking, and she spend many sleeplessness nights making sure my grandmother was breathing or not up wandering the halls. To my grandparents, she was their dietitian, physical therapist, nurse, cook and housekeeper. Although, she is now in her sixties and some of her outward beauty has faded, and her circles under her eyes are dark, she is the most beautiful woman to me because she gave of herself benevolently to her parents without any reward. She exemplifies what is means to truly be …show more content…
Outward beauty in America is not a standard for a country in African or Tonga where access to media sources are limited. American values slim women with light skin, straight hair and European features as beautiful, whereas some other countries find a woman is beautiful if she has wide hips and a darker complexion. However, America’s requirements are slowly spreading across the world because of media. Women now are bleaching their skin, obtaining plastic surgery to be skinner and look more European. But the change of an outward appearance does not correlate to a person’s inner beauty. Yes, some people are only fixated on a person’s outward appearance, but looks do not last forever, and outward beauty is not
Every individual cares about how they appear to others; their shape and in this informal, narrative essay titled Chicken-Hips, Canadian journalist and producer Catherine Pigott tells her story on her trip to Gambia and her body appearance. In this compelling essay the thesis is implicit and the implied thesis is about how women are judged differently on their appearance in different parts of the world, as various cultures and individuals have a different perception on what ideal beauty is. In this essay Pigott writes about her trip to Africa specifically Gambia and how upon arriving there she was judged to be too slim for a woman. She goes to write about how differently she would be judged back home by mentioning “in my county we deny ourselves
It is well known that Plato, a devoted student of Socrates, chronicled many of Socrates' speeches and conversations. Every so often one can find instances where Socrates and other players in these conversations seem to contradict themselves, or at least muddle their arguments. One such occurrence of this is in Plato's Symposium and Plato's Phaedrus. Both texts speak of love in its physical sense, both texts describe love and its effects, and both discuss how it is best realized, yet they do this in very different fashions, and for different reasons.
A great writer once wrote: “The most important things are the hardest to say. They are the things you get ashamed of, because words diminish them -- words shrink things that seemed limitless when they were in your head to no more than living size when they 're brought out.” Boundless things -- ideas, concepts, memories -- are all torn apart when we speak about them. They get cut up into little pieces, so that we may chew on them and digest them without choking. We end up turning these immeasurable things into literary defecation. Love, for instance, has been constant subject among writers and philosophers for eons. Everyone from E.L James to Plato has written on love and attempted to explore it with language. In Plato’s Symposium, love is discussed
Plato’s The Symposium creates an atmosphere that attempts to justify love in a way that excludes women in order to substantiate Plato’s belief that men are more intellectually capable than women. The constant explanation and praise of love among men not only illustrates Plato’s view that males are superior, but it also reveals his reverence for relationships between men as opposed to relationships between men and women. In addition, while the Symposium focuses on a sense of love that yearns to find completion, it also uses Aristophanes to explain that regardless of the gender of an individual, each person seeks to find completion in their own sense, however, Plato maintains a strong point of view towards the love shared among men.
“Love is many splendid thing, all you need is love,” this quote is from one of my favorite songs entitled Elephant Love Medley which is featured in the movical (a movie musical), Moulin Rouge. The song is a duet between Christian, a playwright, and Satine, the lead actress of his current play, Ewan McGregor and Nicole Kidman play the two roles. This song is a compilation of love songs that were qui (Kidman, McGregor and Leguizamo)te popular during the 20th century, Christian is singing to Satine trying to convince her that they can love each other and that nothing else matters. When I was reading Plato’s Symposium this song kept playing in my mind for the fact that it addresses different kinds of love, or eros, which is the main concept of the Symposium, just with a different approach.
The Bhagavad-Gita and Plato’s Symposium both originate from two vastly different cultures, with the former being archetypal of Eastern thought and the latter existing as a foundation of Western philosophy. Despite their differences in origin, there is significant overlap in the ideas presented in the two texts. Both The Bhagavad-Gita and Symposium vilify desire to a certain extent, stating that abstinence from desire is the only way to pursue knowledge with clarity. However, the philosophies of the two texts diverge with respect to the relationship between desire and power, with The Bhagavad-Gita viewing desire as weakening the individual and Symposium presenting it as a means for empowerment.
Socrates spoke earlier in the text about a woman, Diotima’s, ladder of love. He speaks of what she taught him of different levels of love. According to Diotima, there’s a general kind of love, which is the desire of good things and of being happy. A specific kind of love is a rational love. This is the kind of love that seeks good things, but realizes that to seek good things, one must understand what “good” is. To understand what good is, says Socrates, one must discuss with others, asking questions and thinking
Plato and Aristotle were both very influential men of there time bringing vast knowledge to the world. I honestly believe that Democracy does a lot of good but it definitely has some common side effects. Out of all of Plato's significant ideas, his best was the idea of democracy opening political decisions to the majority who cannot think on behalf of the community. Aristotle on the other hand is very optimistic when it comes to democracy so it becomes a rather interesting compare and contrast between these to men.
This thesis paper analyzes the key speeches given in Plato’s Symposium. However, I also go back in time, finding myself at that same Athenian dinner party amongst the others and become Plato’s seventh speaker, offering another eulogy to Eros in which I express my own theory of love. My purpose will be to express my understanding of the relationship between love, desire, and philosophy, drawing upon the insight of each Symposium speaker. As the seventh speaker, I will express how humans seek truth from love and wisdom through the search of Self, but only when mirroring their twin soul. In this universal mission intertwined with experience of Self and its other half, each must wait until the whole is discovered…
By having an impossible ideal female look, society is beating us as women. We have no time to come up in world through politics, business, or any other power related structure because we’re spending all of our time trying to maintain, or achieve this beauty. The ideal woman is ever-changing. Different features and different characteristics are valued at different times and throughout different cultures. And each time the ideals change, or one changes the culture they live in, a woman must change too because if she’s not the ideal beauty, then she is less of a woman. For instance, in Judith Ortiz Cofer’s case, she was beautiful, tall, and light skinned in the Puerto Rican culture, but in the American culture, she was short, dark skinned, and not the most beautiful. Beauty is relevant to time and place. And often, we forget this and are manipulated by society to think the beauty of the time and place is the most important thing for a woman to have.
In Book one of the Republic of Plato, several definitions of justice versus injustice are explored. Cephalus, Polemarchus, Glaucon and Thracymicus all share their opinions and ideas on what actions they believe to be just, while Socrates questions various aspects of the definitions. In book one, Socrates is challenged by Thracymicus, who believes that injustice is advantageous, but eventually convinces him that his definition is invalid. Cephalus speaks about honesty and issues of legality, Polemarchus explores ideas regarding giving to one what is owed, Glaucon views justice as actions committed for their consequences, and Socrates argues that justice does not involve harming anybody. Through the interrogations and arguments he has with four other men, and the similarity of his ideas of justice to the word God, Socrates proves that a just man commits acts for the benefits of others, and inflicts harm on nobody.
As students file into the auditorium of the Academy the first thing that we all notice is the two professors that were standing at the front of the room. After all the students were seated that is when the first professor stepped forward to address the class. Plato: Good Morning Students! Students: Good Morning Professor! Plato: Many of you may know who I am and then there are those of you that do not. For those of you that do not know who I am, my name is Plato. I founded this Academy in 387 and it is the first of its kind (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_Academy). I have studied under many great philosophers. After Plato got done speaking he stepped back and the professor standing to the left of him stepped forward and addressed the class. Aristotle: Good Morning Student! Students: Good Morning Professor! Aristotle: Like Plato there are many of you that know me and there are those of you that do not. So I will introduce myself to those of you that do not know me. My name is Aristotle. I was a
Socrates and Plato were some of the world’s most famous philosophers. Yet, they caused much trouble in the midst of their philosophizing. These philosophers, in the view of the political elites, were threatening the Athenian democracy with their philosophy. But why did they go against the status quo? What was their point in causing all of this turmoil? Plato and Socrates threatened the democracy as a wake-up call. They wanted the citizens to be active thinkers and improve society. This manifested itself in three main ways: Socrates’ life, his student Plato’s life, and their legacy in our modern age.
never wrote a line that we know of; all that we know of him (his
As is said by Elena Rossini, "Western beauty ideals — actually, man-made Western beauty ideals — have spread to the rest of the world through globalization and are now being upheld as models even in places like India and Japan". It is clearly validated that western beauty standards are now scattered everywhere in our routine lives. We see examples of such unrealistic standards in things like magazines, catwalks, billboards, advertisements on TVs and blogs etc. Another example that can be observed is the high end favoritism of unrealistic beauty standards in catwalks of notorious brands such as Victoria's Secret. social media apps have over 1000 million users watching those models who have moulded themselves according to the beauty standards. To specify these ideals, for women the ideal is considered to be a well-toned tall body having a small waist, long legs, porcelain skin with delicate features and a pearly smile. These are the characteristics possessed by the majority of western citizens in USA, France, Italy , UK even Russia and china. The more the Caucasian features, the closer to the beauty standards. Whereas for males, the beauty standards do not vary a lot across the map regardless of specific facial features and skin