Plato's Flaws

1085 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Short notes on plato justice

Throughout The Republic, Plato takes three approaches in his explanation of why the just person is happiest. The last two are mostly coherent; however, there are some flaws in his first argument. Plato makes a case for his ideal just state, but this state is impractical and unjust. Within the same argument, he also attempts to draw parallels between justice in the state and justice within individuals, which I find to be unconvincing. The first argument from Plato starts by laying out what he believes to be a just state. He names the state an aristocracy, with philosopher-rulers governing two lower classes. These two other classes are the working class – placed here for their virtue of temperance (moderation with their desires and focused on their societal function) – and the auxiliaries, a warrior class with the virtue of spirit. Plato goes on to explain …show more content…

Grouping everyone based on the best interest of society appears logical, and there is theoretical potential for such a society to exist, but only in a perfect world, since there is bound to be unhappiness within the two lower classes. As he breaks down the alternatives to his state that are timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, and tyranny, his aristocracy becomes more appealing, but truly none of the presented options are just. Plato is certainly coherent when explaining the decline of state and just men, when he says how the appetitive sectors increasingly overrule the rational reasoning parts. However, the problem lies with the fact that his state was unjust to begin with and therefore the two cannot be paralleled. As a whole, Plato’s claims for why justice is preferable over injustice are not greatly harmed by these flaws. In fact, his other two “proofs” – the lovers of knowledge, honor, and money, as well as the human shell containing three beings – are less convoluted and more convincing than the first one which I

Show More
Related

  • Justice and Moderation of the Soul in The Republic, by Plato

    3023 Words  | 7 Pages

    In his philosophical text, The Republic, Plato argues that justice can only be realized by the moderation of the soul, which he claims reflects as the moderation of the city. He engages in a debate, via the persona of Socrates, with Ademantus and Gaucon on the benefit, or lack thereof, for the man who leads a just life. I shall argue that this analogy reflecting the governing of forces in the soul and in city serves as a sufficient device in proving that justice is beneficial to those who believe in, and practice it. I shall further argue that Plato establishes that the metaphorical bridge between the city and soul analogy and reality is the leader, and that in the city governed by justice the philosopher is king.

    Read More

  • Critical Summary Of Plato's Republic

    767 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic Book IV, Socrates sets out to convince Glaucon that a person acts with three different parts of the soul, rather than with the soul as a whole. He does this by presenting Glaucon with a variety of situations in which parts of the soul may conflict with one another, and therefore not acting together. Socrates describes the three parts of the soul as the rational part, or that which makes decisions, the appetitive part, or that which desires, and the spirited part, or that which gets angry (436a).

    Read More

  • Glaucon's Challenge and Plato's Theory of Justice in Plato's Republic

    1807 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato’s Republic focuses on one particular question: is it better to be just or unjust? Thrasymachus introduces this question in book I by suggesting that justice is established as an advantage to the stronger, who may act unjustly, so that the weak will “act justly” by serving in their interests. Therefore, he claims that justice is “stronger, freer, and more masterly than justice” (Plato, Republic 344c). Plato begins to argue that injustice is never more profitable to a person than justice and Thrasymachus withdraws from the argument, granting Plato’s response. Glaucon, however, is not satisfied and proposes a challenge to Plato to prove that justice is intrinsically valuable and that living a just life is always superior. This paper will explain Glaucon’s challenge to Plato regarding the value of justice, followed by Plato’s response in which he argues that his theory of justice, explained by three parts of the soul, proves the intrinsic value of justice and that a just life is preeminent. Finally, it will be shown that Plato’s response succeeds in answering Glaucon’s challenge.

    Read More

  • Plato's Criticisms Of Democracy Essay

    1158 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plato views the democratic state as a city “full of freedom and freedom of speech[,]” where its citizens “have the license to do [whatever they] want” and the right to self-determine. Plato however, sees this insatiable desire for freedom at the expense of neglecting everything else as the downfall of democracy. To clarify, a society that is staunchly protective of its equality and freedom will be particularly sensitive towards any oppositions that seem to limit them, to the point where it actively attempts to “avoid [obeying the law and] having any master at all.” Thus, “unless the rulers are very pliable and provide plenty of that freedom, they are punished by the city and accused of being oligarchs.” Since those in power fear the accusations of those being ruled, they become docile and submissive. On the other hand, those who are ruled are encouraged by their rulers’ meekness and, convinced of their inherent right to freedom, begin to behave as their own rulers. Thus, this blind chase for unconditional freedom will propagate disorder across the society, and eventually cause the people to see “anarchy [as] freedom, extravagance [as] magnificence, and shamelessness [as]

    Read More

  • The Republic of Plato

    1306 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...ct city consists of everyone feeling equal to one another from birth to present. Plato thinks a just city is formed on the beliefs that everyone is forced into specific factions and told who to unify with, despite the persons personal beliefs. Plato's views on a "just city" were to far fetched and had a very similar ideology to communism. Aristotle even agreed that taking away private property was a bad idea because it "takes away the incentive to work hard" (Aristotle, ppt9).

    Read More

  • Plato And Paternalism

    1087 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plato defends himself by explaining that he is thinking what is best for society, and not just for one specific group. If there is an exceptional good person, it is further exceptional for them to identify and further trained because it is what is best for the collective good, and of that exceptionally good must take justice into their own hands. (186). He argues that the guardians are always on the scent for truth, like dogs who are the most philosophical of all animals, so therefore they should rule because in a way they are like philosophers, and Plato believes the philosophers are titled to become rulers. (explain the corruption part on 188.) When Munitiz brings up the how Plato lays out only a program for the ruling class. He counteracts acts that statement and explains that he only wants a city where are the citizens are able to achieve their virtues leading them to their happiness, but for that to happen it requires rulers to be one with city and will never exploit it. He claims this would lead to not only a just city, but justice for

    Read More

  • Plato's Noble Falsehood

    1675 Words  | 4 Pages

    Even today, Noble falsehood is a popular topic. On one hand, people are keen to talk how politicians use those well-intentional lies to achieve some incredible things. On the other hand, people accuse those politicians of divesting people’s right of choice making and intentionally hiding the truth. It seems that people have an alternative feeling towards falsehood. Thus, this essay is aim to discuss why and how in some cases falsehood is such a useful thing in politics, whereas in the others it is a contradiction in Plato’s political project.

    Read More

  • The Republic Book 1

    1661 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato does not argue whether it is more moral to live justly, but rather whether it is more beneficial, whether the just life will make one happier.

    Read More

  • Plato's Views on Happiness

    928 Words  | 2 Pages

    To be just or unjust. To be happy or unhappy? Men fall into these two categories. Why does a man act according to these 2 extremes? Is it because they fear punishment? Are they quivering in fear of divine retribution? Or do men do just things because it is good for them to do so? Is justice, good of its rewards and consequences? Or is it good for itself. What is justice? Are the people who are just, just as happy as the people who are unjust? Plato sheds light on these questions and says yes, I have the definition of justice and yes, just people are happy if not happier than unjust people. Plato show’s that justice is worthwhile in and of itself and that being a just person equates to being a happy person. In my opinion, Plato does a good job and is accurate when explaining what it is to be just and this definition is an adequate solution to repairing an unjust person or an unjust city or anything that has an unjust virtue and using the definition of what justice is accurately explains why just people are happier than unjust people.

    Read More

  • Characteristics Of A Just Man In Plato's The Republic

    1607 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout The Republic, Plato constructs an ideal community in the hopes of ultimately finding a just man. However, because Plato’s tenets focus almost exclusively on the community as a whole rather than the individual, he neglects to find a just man. For example, through Socrates, Plato comments, “our aim in founding the

    Read More

  • What It Means to be a Just Man

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    The ideas that Plato instills are both detailed and distinctive, on the other hand he believes that actions do not necessarily justify a person but rather, he states that justness is more of an internal virtue. The idea he is trying to convey is that justness comes from the interpretation of the soul rather than the physical functions. The reasoning behind this is that if the soul remains just, then the resulting actions will reflect just ends. Once the fact that the soul must be just is accepted, the question arises of what qualifies the soul as just will need to be answered.

    Read More

  • The Role Of Justice In The Ring Of Gyges, By Plato

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    It might be a good way to structure a society, and it might work, but therecould be other ways that would be just as successful. Plato makes connections to the just society and the just individual by claimingthat each class in the just society is driven by a main emotion of soul. Producers are controlledmainly by their appetites, which are mainly worldly appetites; for example, money, sex, fame,luxurious living, etc. Auxiliaries are driven by the spirit of courageousness which dwells withineach one of them. The Guardians are driven by their will to learn and their rational mind.

    Read More

  • Are Just People More Happy Than Unjust People Analysis

    1285 Words  | 3 Pages

    Eyes and ears are not virtuous, at least in the manner that we use the word today. If we acknowledge that this loose usage of those words may just be an artifact of translation, then this portion of his argument is valid and sound, otherwise

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    1440 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, the main argument is dedicated to answering Glaucon and Adeimantus, who question the reason for just behavior. They argue it is against one’s self-interest to be just, but Plato believes the behavior is in fact in one’s self-interest because justice is inherently good. Plato tries to prove this through his depiction of an ideal city, which he builds from the ground up, and ultimately concludes that justice requires the philosopher to perform the task of ruling. Since the overall argument is that justice pays, it follows that it would be in the philosopher’s self-interest to rule – however, Plato also states that whenever people with political power believe they benefit from ruling, a good government is impossible. Thus, those who rule regard the task of ruling as not in their self-interest, but something intrinsically evil. This is where Plato’s argument that justice is in one’s self-interest is disturbed. This paper will discuss the idea that justice is not in one’s self-interest, and thus does not pay.

    Read More

  • Plato's Explanation of an Ideal State in his Work, The Republic

    1874 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... state. In Plato's argument for the ideal state, the fundamental bonds which hold together his republic are unity and harmony. He explains how the just state is held together by the unity of each individual in each social class, and harmony between all three social classes. Plato explains how the ideal state must have citizens who are united in their goals. It is not the happiness of the individual but rather the happiness of the whole which keeps the just state ideal. At the same time, Plato argues that there must be harmony within the individual souls which make up the state. The lack of unity and harmony leads to despotism through anarchy which eventually arises within a democracy. Plato makes a clear argument, through The Republic, that without the unity and harmony of the individual and the state there can be no order and therefore there can be no ideal state.

    Read More

More about Plato's Flaws

Open Document